Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is more urban?
Washington D.C. 21 14.48%
Philadelphia P.A. 124 85.52%
Voters: 145. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-19-2013, 03:38 PM
 
349 posts, read 573,136 times
Reputation: 266

Advertisements

I think people need to redefine urbanity if we are simply equating it with highrises. Crystal City and Pentagon city are good examples of Transit Oriented Development, but good urbanity they're not. Unless you like walking through dead plazas at 7PM on a weekday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-19-2013, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
I already provided that answer when it comes to areas outside the city limits but when it comes to areas within city limits, areas like University City and Templetown fit those qualities perfectly.

University City is apart of Philly's core so it's not an outside core downtown like the ones in D.C. Kidphilly defined the core already. University City was added to Center City, without it being added to Center City, Philly's core is diminished pretty substantially. Are you saying University City shouldn't be included with Center City when going up against D.C.'s core? University City was added to Center City I believe to give Philly a fighting chance against the D.C. urban core footprint. You may want to check with Kidphilly to see what he thinks should be included though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
Umm yes.

nyc, la, sf, san diego, chicago, baltimore, st louis, kansas city, milwaukee, minneapolis, dallas, houston, austin, portland, seattle, atlanta, providence, boston, newark, philadelphia, new orleans, sacramento, denver, cincinatti, cleveland, oakland, columbus, pittsburgh, nashville, miami, etc. etc.

I agree that your suburbs are more urban than others suburbs, but they are also ... surrounded by suburban development.

LOL....umm no.

Couple things.....

Subway access?
Subway Frequency?
Amount of parking lots?
Population Density?


You are kidding right? Take Atlanta for instance, the Entire Metro Area of Atlanta doesn't have a census tract with a higher population density than the highest census tracts in the suburb Silver Spring!

You're really trying to talk about single family homes? LOL....the following:

Kansas City, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Dallas, Houston, Austin, Portland, Seattle, Atlanta, Columbus, Nashville

Every single one of these area's is saturated with single family homes. Shoot, many of these have single family homes In Their Downtowns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by goonsta View Post
I think people need to redefine urbanity if we are simply equating it with highrises. Crystal City and Pentagon city are good examples of Transit Oriented Development, but good urbanity they're not. Unless you like walking through dead plazas at 7PM on a weekday.

Pentagon City and Crystal City are in the middle of major redevelopment. They will be vibrant very soon. And you already know what is happening in the places you didn't name. Those places already have tracts with population densities over 40,000 people per square mile and some close to 50,000 people per square mile if not over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 06:12 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,133,368 times
Reputation: 6338
Give me Midtown Atlanta over any of those DC satellite cities anyday lmao.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 06:26 PM
 
349 posts, read 573,136 times
Reputation: 266
If you limit the qualifications of a successful downtown to those 4 categories, and ignore everything else that makes a place vibrant, you can make any place look better in your favor. You've established subway access and dense housing within the very center, all are great qualities to have, but are not neccessary in creating a vibrant downtown.

Lets talk about the aspects of downtowns, the things to see and do that keep people visiting, keep the streets alive and vibrant: Restaurants, Stores, services and attractions (museums, theatres, parks, places of interest, etc). Fortunately, Yelp has a feature that lets you measure how many are in a particular area, including a 1 mile walking distance. For the purposes of comparison, I'll limit this to shopping and restaurants, because there's too many other categories.

Here's whats in a 1 square mile walking area of Silver Spring, MD

Silver Spring
Restaurants - 157
Shopping - 251

A sampling of other cities you mentioned

Milwaukee, WI
Restaurants - 377
Shopping - 342

Nashville, TN
Restaurants - 482
Shopping - 394

Here are some other cities not mentioned:

Madison, WI
Restaurants - 314
Shopping - 224

Savannah, GA
Restaurants - 249
Shopping - 293

Indianapolis, IN
Restaurants - 374
Shopping - 286

Santa Monica, CA
Restaurants - 257
Shopping - 676

Evanston, IL
Restaurants - 172
Shopping - 263

I don't know why would you think that downtown Silver Spring would be comparable to Atlanta or Portland, both centers of metropolitan areas over 3 Million, but here they are nonetheless.

Atlanta
Restaurants - 714
Shopping - 1071

Portland, OR
Restaurants - 1062
Shopping - 1137

Like I said, its good for a suburban downtown, and great that its a TOD, and its comparable to a lot of smaller downtowns in the US, especially the ones that aren't that healthy, but its pretty pompous to say its bigger than all but 12?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 07:19 PM
 
489 posts, read 911,230 times
Reputation: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
Umm yes.

nyc, la, sf, san diego, chicago, baltimore, st louis, kansas city, milwaukee, minneapolis, dallas, houston, austin, portland, seattle, atlanta, providence, boston, newark, philadelphia, new orleans, sacramento, denver, cincinatti, cleveland, oakland, columbus, pittsburgh, nashville, miami, etc. etc.
Is this post serious? NYC, SF, LA, Chicago and Boston are the only one's comparable. The rest... lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 07:23 PM
 
489 posts, read 911,230 times
Reputation: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Give me Midtown Atlanta over any of those DC satellite cities anyday lmao.
But then you have to live in Atlanta...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 08:02 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by goonsta View Post
If you limit the qualifications of a successful downtown to those 4 categories, and ignore everything else that makes a place vibrant, you can make any place look better in your favor. You've established subway access and dense housing within the very center, all are great qualities to have, but are not neccessary in creating a vibrant downtown.

Lets talk about the aspects of downtowns, the things to see and do that keep people visiting, keep the streets alive and vibrant: Restaurants, Stores, services and attractions (museums, theatres, parks, places of interest, etc). Fortunately, Yelp has a feature that lets you measure how many are in a particular area, including a 1 mile walking distance. For the purposes of comparison, I'll limit this to shopping and restaurants, because there's too many other categories.

Here's whats in a 1 square mile walking area of Silver Spring, MD

Silver Spring
Restaurants - 157
Shopping - 251

A sampling of other cities you mentioned

Milwaukee, WI
Restaurants - 377
Shopping - 342

Nashville, TN
Restaurants - 482
Shopping - 394

Here are some other cities not mentioned:

Madison, WI
Restaurants - 314
Shopping - 224

Savannah, GA
Restaurants - 249
Shopping - 293

Indianapolis, IN
Restaurants - 374
Shopping - 286

Santa Monica, CA
Restaurants - 257
Shopping - 676

Evanston, IL
Restaurants - 172
Shopping - 263

I don't know why would you think that downtown Silver Spring would be comparable to Atlanta or Portland, both centers of metropolitan areas over 3 Million, but here they are nonetheless.

Atlanta
Restaurants - 714
Shopping - 1071

Portland, OR
Restaurants - 1062
Shopping - 1137

Like I said, its good for a suburban downtown, and great that its a TOD, and its comparable to a lot of smaller downtowns in the US, especially the ones that aren't that healthy, but its pretty pompous to say its bigger than all but 12?

I think you are mistaking what is being argued here. This thread and discussion is not about amenities. It's about urban built form. Things like population density, built form (building street relationship), rapid transit access and frequency, walkability, and urban design. If you go back and read, nobody is talking about museums, restaurants, or cultural attractions. That is for another thread and let's be honest here, you are talking about Washington D.C. which is a peer to NYC, LA, and Chicago etc. when talking about cultural offerings. D.C. doesn't compete with the lower tiered cities you are listing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Give me Midtown Atlanta over any of those DC satellite cities anyday lmao.

From a cultural amenities and livability standpoint, I agree with you. This, however, is talking about places to live that are outside of the core of D.C. that still give the option for urban living. D.C. is expensive and many people that want an urban lifestyle but can't afford the core of the city live outside of the city proper. D.C. is one of the few cities that offers this level of urbanity outside of the core. In most other cities, you would have no option like these satellite cities outside of their actual downtown's and Atlanta is one of those examples.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top