Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city is more cultural and iconic?
Chicago 71 48.63%
San Francisco 75 51.37%
Voters: 146. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2014, 07:17 AM
 
2,513 posts, read 3,409,365 times
Reputation: 2734

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Though maybe Chicago can try to make itself more attractive to international travelers--and a lot of international travelers, and certainly the ones who log in the most repeat trips, are business travelers. It'd be nice for Chicago to make big plans again.
It is...Chicago is at the moment hosting a major international travel conference and is opening "Choose Chicago" offices around the world. Some 6000 industry professionals from some 70 countries are being winded and dined by Emmanuel and company.

International POW WOW in Chicago ongoing Global tourism to the United States: Chicago seems to ...

International travel show: Chicago ups its game - Chicago Tribune
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2014, 07:43 AM
 
2,513 posts, read 3,409,365 times
Reputation: 2734
odd synchronicity.......just came across this article about George Lucas' proposed media museum.

Chicago to vie for George Lucas' museum - chicagotribune.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Munich, Germany
1,761 posts, read 1,691,915 times
Reputation: 1203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzrovian View Post
There are reasons that a city can have high international tourist numbers that have little to do with its global recognition. For example Antalya, Turkey routinely scores near the top of international tourism rankings because it is a cheap and easily accessible Black Sea resort (attracting tons of Russians and other Eastern Europeans). Similarly Orlando is one of the top US cities for international tourists (for obvious reasons). Would anyone argue that Antalya and Orlando have a stronger global recognition than Tokyo or Chicago?
Antalya is in the Mediterranean Sea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 10:12 AM
 
Location: NYC
2,545 posts, read 3,310,093 times
Reputation: 1929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guajara View Post
Antalya is in the Mediterranean Sea
You are absolutely right. Mea culpa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 10:12 AM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,165,646 times
Reputation: 6343
I mean, it's just hard to beat out the Golden Gate Bridge, SF Hills, SF historic cable cars, and neighborhoods like The Castro and Haight-Ashbury as far as iconic places are concerned.

I mean, in Chicago, other then the Willis Tower, what is iconic internationally? Chicago has no well known neighborhoods other then Southside Chicago for obvious reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 10:27 AM
 
2,513 posts, read 3,409,365 times
Reputation: 2734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
I mean, it's just hard to beat out the Golden Gate Bridge, SF Hills, SF historic cable cars, and neighborhoods like The Castro and Haight-Ashbury as far as iconic places are concerned.

I mean, in Chicago, other then the Willis Tower, what is iconic internationally? Chicago has no well known neighborhoods other then Southside Chicago for obvious reasons.

I mean, it's hard to beat out all of the river drawbridges, the iconic lakefront, the historic Chicago 'L', and neighborhoods like Hyde Park, Lincoln Park, Lakeview and Wicker Park.

the ignorance about Chicago is astounding in this thread. The South Side is not a neighborhood, it is a SIDE of the city, consisting of dozens of neighborhoods. but whatever, nothing to see in Chicago, that's why San Francisco's own, George Lucas, may build his legacy in Chicago....cause we desperately need a tourist attraction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 10:44 AM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,165,646 times
Reputation: 6343
Quote:
Originally Posted by midwest1 View Post
I mean, it's hard to beat out all of the river drawbridges, the iconic lakefront, the historic Chicago 'L', and neighborhoods like Hyde Park, Lincoln Park, Lakeview and Wicker Park.

the ignorance about Chicago is astounding in this thread. The South Side is not a neighborhood, it is a SIDE of the city, consisting of dozens of neighborhoods. but whatever, nothing to see in Chicago, that's why San Francisco's own, George Lucas, may build his legacy in Chicago....cause we desperately need a tourist attraction.
Those neighborhoods don't really have international fame and recognition. And those 'icons' of Chicago still don't beat SF's iconic destinations. Lol A river drawbridge. Congrats. SF has the GGB which is far more known. Congrats, the historic 'L' which is really just a subway above ground. SF has historic trollies that you consistently see in movies and are very well known. When they announced we were getting a streetcar here in Atlanta, the first thing I thought of was the SF cable cars.

Face it. The numbers don't lie. SF gets over 2x as many international overseas visitors as Chicago does.

I think both Cali powerhouses are more cultural and iconic than Chicago is. People on these forums overrate how known Chicago is around the world, especially when compared to other cities on it's tier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 11:13 AM
 
6,843 posts, read 11,005,237 times
Reputation: 8436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guajara View Post
Antalya is in the Mediterranean Sea
Antalya's barely known by anyone outside of Turkey, it pulls in even higher numbers than Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir simply because it's the transfer point for tourists on cruises (one of the largest cruise ports on the planet). It makes all it's leisure revenue by curious boat dwellers on long itineraries.

http://travel.trade.gov/outreachpage...and_Cities.pdf

If you look at this, you'll surprisingly see Miami top a megacity like Los Angeles in tourism for international visitors. What people here are forgetting is that Miami is the busiest such cruise port on planet Earth. A staggering amount of international tourists arrive via boat, while on vacation often it's apart of the itinerary as a stop when cruises pass through the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico.

Were you to factor in tourism by business, by commercial airlines, by each respective nations, Miami would dip to well below it's present figures and closer to around Boston, Chicago, and Washington DC in international tourism (which is why most leisure companies always put Orlando above Miami as a pure destination, because well it is, via traditional ports of entry (airports)).

That being said, Orlando as a city has no where close to the recognition of Miami or Chicago worldwide, as a city. Miami has no where near the recognition of Los Angeles worldwide (and it's an invisible city to Africa, Oceania, and Asia; some 5 billion people of the 7 billion on Earth).

Certain cities have massive tourism industries, because that's the primary fixture to their respective economies. I'm not saying we should discount tourism because it's by cruise, I'm just saying, we have to look at these things for what they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 12:02 PM
 
2,513 posts, read 3,409,365 times
Reputation: 2734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Those neighborhoods don't really have international fame and recognition. And those 'icons' of Chicago still don't beat SF's iconic destinations. Lol A river drawbridge. Congrats. SF has the GGB which is far more known. Congrats, the historic 'L' which is really just a subway above ground. SF has historic trollies that you consistently see in movies and are very well known. When they announced we were getting a streetcar here in Atlanta, the first thing I thought of was the SF cable cars.

Face it. The numbers don't lie. SF gets over 2x as many international overseas visitors as Chicago does.

I think both Cali powerhouses are more cultural and iconic than Chicago is. People on these forums overrate how known Chicago is around the world, especially when compared to other cities on it's tier.
ummm there are dozens of drawbridges, in fact Chicago has more movable bridges than anywhere in the world.

Why not educate yourself, you obviously need it.
Chicago: The Movable Bridge Capital of the World Gapers Block: Ask the Librarian
http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/med...on-chicago.jpg

Those are 6 and 4 lane bridges with sidewalks that fly into the air...the most impressive drawbridges on Earth. Suppose Atlanta has something more impressive, a 40 lane highway perchance?

And have you never seem the "L" on screen? What planet are you living on. And hate to tell you, very very few people from outside of America know about Haight-Ashbury...and if its Gay neighborhoods you are looking for (Castro), Boystown in Chicago was recently ranked best gay neighborhood in the world

Out Traveler Award Winner: Incomparable Gay Neighborhood | OUTTraveler.com | The Standard of Gay Travel

And face it, Chicago got some 46 million visitors last year as compared to 17 million for San Francisco, of course the lion's share of Chicago's numbers are Americans. Do we not count?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 12:13 PM
 
6,843 posts, read 11,005,237 times
Reputation: 8436
Forgot to weight in, San Francisco has more features well known across the world. It's more iconic, in my opinion. It's probably more well known today, strongly because of it's Pacific Rim DNA (lots of business and social connections to that side of the world, part of the world with a staggering population in raw numbers).

Chicago's the more cultured city in my opinion, in the traditional sense (theater, improv (comedy/tragedy), institutions of culture, musicals, and the play "Chicago" has numerous posterboards in "leisure heavy" areas of Manhattan with a fixture of early 1900's Chicago style). So on.

Last edited by Trafalgar Law; 04-10-2014 at 12:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top