Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is the most diverse?
Boston 3 2.88%
Chicago 6 5.77%
Houston 21 20.19%
Los Angeles 35 33.65%
Miami 7 6.73%
Montreal 4 3.85%
San Francisco 11 10.58%
Vancouver 5 4.81%
Washington 12 11.54%
Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2014, 11:09 PM
 
1,295 posts, read 2,517,506 times
Reputation: 1307

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Well, among large US metros, the top 5 are:

1 San Francisco
2 Washington DC
3 New York
4 San Jose
5 Las Vegas

https://www.city-data.com/forum/city-...erse-msas.html
This list makes the most sense. You have to factor in the metro area of a particular city, and not just the city itself. I don't necessarily consider a city/metro area diverse because it has a large number of one minority ethnic group; i.e., San Antonio (lived there for 4 years and loved it) isn't diverse simply because it has a majority of its residents with a Mexican-American background, it just makes it a majority-M/A metro area. Same with Detroit and African-Americans. I currently live in the D.C. metro area, which is considered on the list above at #2, and rightfully so. We have every conceivable ethnic group represented in large numbers here, most of whom don't congregate in 'neighborhoods' (like NY), but live all over the metro area, mostly in the suburbs. The following ethnic groups have a sizable presence in the D.C. metro area (and I'll probably forget a few):

Ethiopians
Guatamalans
Salvadorans
Russians
Koreans
Vietnamese
Chinese
Thais
Mongolians (no kidding)
Peruvians
Bolivians
Jamaicans
Ukrainians
Bulgarians
English
Irish
Polish
Columbians
Nigerians
Ghanaians
Phillipinos
Somalis
Egyptians
Moroccans
Greeks
Lebanese
Turks
Armenians
Brazilians
Venezuelans
Cubans
Mexicans
Indians
Pakistanis
Bengalis
Nepalese
Iraqis
Afghanis
Persians
Palestinians
Saudis
The Baltic States (Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia)
The Balkans (Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, etc.)
Romanians
Czechs


Smaller, but still significant numbers of people from:

Germany
France
Spain
Italy
Scandanavia (especially Norway)
South Africa
Australia
Trinidad/Tobago
St. Kitts
Haiti
Liberia
Eritrea
Cambodia
Myanmar (Burma)
Honduras
Guyana
Dominican Republic
Canada
Japan
Ecuador
Hungary
Slovakia

These are all immigrant groups, and I haven't mentioned that native born American ethnic groups also reside here but the area is so international that, for example, an African-American, Italian-American or an Irish-American isn't even figured into the local 'diversity' equation----we're just considered "American" here.

Last edited by smithy77; 09-05-2014 at 11:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2014, 01:21 AM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,400,818 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweat209 View Post
How could the Queens have more diversity than Miami ,LA ,Toronto ,SF or Houston?
Queens, pound for pound, is probably the most diverse place on the planet. It's definitely more diverse than all the places you listed.

I mean, some you listed, like Miami, have a dominant ethnic background (Latin American, esp. Carribean Latin). Queens has nothing remotely close to a dominant background.

It has big concentrations of all kinds of little known groups, from Bukharan Jews (largest community outside of Tajikistan), to Indio Ecuadorians (largest community outside of Ecuador) to Nepalese (largest community in the Americas) to Guyanese (largest community outside of Guyana). Queens is crazy diverse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2014, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Muncie, IN
588 posts, read 1,325,279 times
Reputation: 522
Factor in the metro and indeed Toronto and SF are incredibly diverse. I'd say it's NYC, LA, SF, Toronto... Sacramento is incredibly diverse but the numbers are smaller than these huge metros. There's something said about the density and shear number of ethnicities in a compact area which makes it feel even more diverse than it may actually be. This is why Toronto and London feel way more diverse than Sacramento IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2014, 09:19 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,260,591 times
Reputation: 14773
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweat209 View Post
Houston Surpasses New York And Los Angeles As The 'Most Diverse In Nation'

Houston has surpassed the likes of Los Angeles and New York as the most ethnically diverse metropolitan area in the the U.S., according to a new report out of Rice University.


Houston Surpasses New York And Los Angeles As The 'Most Diverse In Nation'
So Houston gets a Houston university to name Houston the most diverse city in the nation...imagine that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2014, 05:09 PM
 
2,253 posts, read 3,739,171 times
Reputation: 1023
What communities exist in Houston that aren't found in say, L.A.? It's pretty easy to think of large groups in L.A. that don't have much of a presence in Houston, but not the other way around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2014, 05:55 PM
 
1,353 posts, read 1,652,549 times
Reputation: 817
I've never been to Toronto, but find it odd that anyone would automatically assume it's more diverse than LA, or the Bay Area, or DC metro, etc.

On gut feel alone, if you exclude NYC and Toronto, I would think LA is most diverse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2014, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,701 posts, read 67,775,588 times
Reputation: 21282
^We dont need to go by instinct or opinion because there are actual statistics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2014, 09:42 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
5,294 posts, read 10,250,810 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of Kensington View Post
No it isn't. I'm almost certain the methodology is the "balance" between the "big 4" ethno-racial groups: whites, blacks, Hispanics and Asians. It doesn't measure diversity of the immigrant population or diversity within these 4 categories. It's nonsense like this that leads many to erroneously believe that places like Oakland and Sacramento are more diverse than London!

New York's Black population is heavily Caribbean, while L.A. is almost all African American. L.A.'s Hispanic population is dominated by Mexicans, while in New York the two leading Hispanic groups - Puerto Ricans and Dominicans only make up about half the Hispanic population. New York's white population is more diverse than L.A.'s - more "white ethnics" like Italians and more European-born in the population, though the large Armenian population in L.A. certainly is unparalleled elsewhere and adds to its diversity. The Asian populations in both cities are very diverse, although L.A. has more Filipinos, Koreans and Vietnamese while New York has far more South Asians. Indeed, it's strange that South Asians are lumped in with East Asians.
Armenian being "White ethnic" is arguable...many Armenians I know consider themselves mixed or Asian, since that part of the world has been conquered by many different empires (Persian, Russian, Mongol, etc) and racially mixed up throughout history.

Plus, LA does have many "White ethnics". A lot of Russian people moving there straight from Russia, and other Eastern Europeans coming there as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 05:29 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,357 posts, read 39,777,465 times
Reputation: 21432
Premise doesn't make sense. There's no clear cut boundary between Toronto and some of the other metros (most importantly LA) since you can measure diversity in many ways such as sheer size of so and so number of different communities (obviously goes to LA).

An argument for NYC's exclusion might make sense, but that's about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Toronto
15,102 posts, read 15,980,148 times
Reputation: 5202
Good info contained below about T.O's diversity:

48 percent Foreign Born - 49 percent identified as Vis Min and healthy representation from a variety of ethnicities and over 140 languages/dialects spoken. Plus over 30 percent of T.O's residents no speaky English or French at home.

Demographics of Toronto - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Diversity - Toronto Facts - Your City | City of Toronto
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top