Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which has the strongest Italian presence?
Baltimore 24 55.81%
New Orleans 8 18.60%
San Francisco 11 25.58%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-22-2014, 12:53 PM
 
2,253 posts, read 3,735,243 times
Reputation: 1018

Advertisements

The lack of "authenticity" in Manhattan doesn't matter much because there are plenty of actual Italian enclaves in the outer boroughs, Westchester County, Long Island and northern New Jersey.

Almost no "Little Italy" today is authentic anymore, except arguably for Boston's North End.

 
Old 09-22-2014, 01:02 PM
 
10,123 posts, read 10,030,537 times
Reputation: 5796
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
People aren't going to vote New Orleans because it's in the South. They aren't really paying attention to the numbers.

Funny thing is that La Cosa Nostra has always had a higher profile in NOLA than it has in SF or Baltimore. New Orleans has long been known as a Wiseguy town.


New Orleans Mafiaboss Carlos Marcello - YouTube
Baltimore is the south too, so I don't see the logic in that statement.
 
Old 09-22-2014, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,186 posts, read 34,887,020 times
Reputation: 15154
Quote:
Originally Posted by KodeBlue View Post
Baltimore is the south too, so I don't see the logic in that statement.
You're right.
 
Old 09-22-2014, 01:22 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,570,025 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
People aren't going to vote New Orleans because it's in the South. They aren't really paying attention to the numbers.

Funny thing is that La Cosa Nostra has always had a higher profile in NOLA than it has in SF or Baltimore. New Orleans has long been known as a Wiseguy town.


New Orleans Mafiaboss Carlos Marcello - YouTube
The history of the Mafia in New Orleans is pretty fascinating--they had one of the earliest if not the earliest branches of the Sicilian Mafia and Carlos Marcello was at one point one of the most powerful mob bosses in the entire US outside of New York or Chicago. Louisiana was such a corrupt state though that organized crime was able to really thrive for years.
 
Old 09-22-2014, 01:28 PM
 
2,253 posts, read 3,735,243 times
Reputation: 1018
I believe that New Orleans ca. 1870 had the largest Italian population in the US.
 
Old 09-22-2014, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,976,400 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
North Beach is pretty touristy and as someone who's been going there since I was a kid in the 80s, it seems to have gotten even less Italian in that period, though it's gotten more touristy--and there's plenty of newer Italian restaurants of varying standards. Some of the old joints are still there though, despite the oldest one closing down two years ago and quality has gone down at some of the places--and the bakeries serving cannolis seem to be mostly run by Mexicans these days. I remember going as a kid though, and you still had restaurants that were very old school in feel. Also, a lot of where Italians used to live in North Beach is now part of Chinatown--and the rest is very expensive.

It's still a nice neighborhood to see, the area around Washington Square Park and St. Peter and Paul Church is attractive, and there's some decent cafes and the old City Lights bookstore(since it's also on the Beatnik nostalgia tour). And there is very high number of places to get Italian food and gelato, though there might be better places to eat at other parts of SF. It's fun to walk around though since it's always got a lot of pedestrian traffic usually even well into the night(though being close to a bunch of strip clubs on Broadway helps that), and if there's still some good places among the touristy places. There's a couple Italian social clubs still left though I'm sure the membership is pretty old at this point.

If one really wants to taste the best thing Italians were responsible for bringing to San Francisco, just find a place serving really good cioppino(with dungeness crab), that's the one dish that I'd say that sums up San Francisco(and that part of the coast) for me. You don't have to go to North Beach though as some of the best places are in other spots in the city.

It's better than San Diego's tiny Little Italy, I got a pretty good Italian sandwich at a deli there last time I was in San Diego that seemed to be about the highlight. Honestly though, a lot of the designated "Little Italy" districts around the country seem pretty touristy--just like Chinatowns they're not always even the best place to eat the food. But they can be fun.
Yeah, that sounds nice. SF is one of my favorite cities to walk around anyway and Little Italys are usually great for that-North Boston, Italian Market South Philly, Arthur Ave, etc. I know SF has a good deal of Italian/Italian-American history so that would also be interesting.

San Diego had an interesting history too mostly revolving around the fishing industry and the area seemed cool but our dinner wasn't that great. The "Italian Market" in South Philly these days is also increasingly Mexican and Asian but the old landmarks are still there-including Ralph's, the oldest Italian restaurant in the country.
 
Old 09-22-2014, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,514 posts, read 26,420,450 times
Reputation: 13320
Quote:
Originally Posted by KodeBlue View Post
Baltimore is the south too, so I don't see the logic in that statement.
You and a select few are the only people who think that.
 
Old 09-22-2014, 03:00 PM
 
2,253 posts, read 3,735,243 times
Reputation: 1018
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonelitist View Post
Baltimore. Then SF. Then NOLA a far behind.
Why?
 
Old 09-22-2014, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,514 posts, read 26,420,450 times
Reputation: 13320
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of Kensington View Post
Why?
Skipped over the numbers looks like.
 
Old 09-22-2014, 03:32 PM
 
2,253 posts, read 3,735,243 times
Reputation: 1018
Another interesting to note is that the surge in Italian immigration seemed to happen about a decade or two earlier in New Orleans/Louisiana and the Italian-born population peaked in 1910.

Italian-born population of New Orleans (Louisiana):

1890 3,622 (7,767)
1900 5,866 (17,431)
1910 8,066 (20,233)
1920 7,633 (16,264)
1930 6,821 (13,526)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top