Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I actually had a choice between these two cities for a job I applied for two years ago (which I didn't get but ultimately got a job with the same agency) and preferred Milwaukee just because it was closer to Chicago and was hopeful that the winters wouldn't be as bad. If I had the same choice again, the Twin Cities would be more competitive as it is obviously a better performing region and has more going for it overall. For this matchup I'll say the Twin Cities.
Tucson or Savannah?
Without interrupting for long, I'd agree with you. Minnesota seems a bit more attractive than Wisconsin these days, although Milwaukee has the proximity to Chicago, and Madison has always been good.
Without interrupting for long, I'd agree with you. Minnesota seems a bit more attractive than Wisconsin these days, although Milwaukee has the proximity to Chicago, and Madison has always been good.
Detroit. Great architecture, professional sports, lots of history/art and developing downtown.
Lake Charles, Louisiana or Beaufort, South Carolina?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
