Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which of these cities should have taller towers due to population?
Jacksonville, FL 23 14.65%
Tampa 13 8.28%
Orlando 28 17.83%
Memphis 13 8.28%
Greenville, SC 11 7.01%
Raleigh, NC 22 14.01%
Cleveland 8 5.10%
Indianapolis 11 7.01%
San Jose 50 31.85%
San Diego 14 8.92%
Phoenix 82 52.23%
San Antonio 31 19.75%
Las Vegas 11 7.01%
Baltimore 16 10.19%
Detroit 13 8.28%
Norfolk, VA 12 7.64%
St Louis 14 8.92%
Milwaukee 5 3.18%
San Francisco 11 7.01%
El Paso 14 8.92%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 157. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2019, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,055 posts, read 14,425,999 times
Reputation: 11240

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Right, and they’re all hotels. I assumed the city would also have a decent amount of office towers in the CBD, but it doesn’t.
Yeah, so true.

The large majority of the public does not realize that about Vegas--that the main "strip" is not downtown.

Downtown Las Vegas has a long way to go in terms of high rise development. I'd put downtown Vegas on par with more overall modest downtowns like Albuquerque or El Paso.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2019, 05:45 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Yeah, so true.

The large majority of the public does not realize that about Vegas--that the main "strip" is not downtown.

Downtown Las Vegas has a long way to go in terms of high rise development. I'd put downtown Vegas on par with more overall modest downtowns like Albuquerque or El Paso.
When I was in Las Vegas, I liked its quaint and kitschy downtown a million times better than the strip.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2019, 05:51 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Yeah, so true.

The large majority of the public does not realize that about Vegas--that the main "strip" is not downtown.

Downtown Las Vegas has a long way to go in terms of high rise development. I'd put downtown Vegas on par with more overall modest downtowns like Albuquerque or El Paso.
When I was in Las Vegas, I liked its downtown a million times better than the strip. There were some great remnants of the smaller scaled kitschy and quirkly Vegas of yesteryear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2019, 06:01 PM
 
37,877 posts, read 41,910,477 times
Reputation: 27274
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDFan View Post
Vegas (downtown, certainly not the strip)
Phoenix (#1 on any list)
Orlando
San Jose
Jacksonville (yes and no; has a surprisingly decent looking skyline from the distance, but it completely fades as you get closer, and there isn't that much going on downtown, so it probably shouldn't have a bigger skyline; it's a very decentralized metro)
I don't see how Jacksonville is a very decentralized metro in terms of its CBD and the skyline. You have the beach communities and St. Augustine which are obviously their own thing, but they are much more recreational and touristy in nature and contribute nothing to the skyline.

Jacksonville is pretty unique in that the St. John's River actually splits the urban core instead of serving as a convenient boundary between two different municipalities/counties. Thus, you have the main northbank cluster which is most often depicted as the city's skyline and includes the Main Street bridge towers, but that vantage point completely excludes the smaller southbank cluster. When the city's skyline is viewed from a distance, both clusters contribute to the visual but once you're actually in downtown, it's broken up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2019, 06:52 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,836,877 times
Reputation: 3101
Fort Worth should be on this list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2019, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,592,398 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjlo View Post
Downtown Vegas would be a heck of a lot cooler if they had built the monstrosities on the strip downtown instead. I'm sure it's space prohibitive and all that, but I agree with the previous poster that there are missed opportunities there.
The strip was chosen, because it's not in Las Vegas city limits (it's county land/unincorporated). The mafia built most of the original casino's and due to pressure from local law enforcement, could not set up in the city of Las Vegas proper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2019, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,514 posts, read 33,519,512 times
Reputation: 12147
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Fort Worth should be on this list.
It probably should. Fort Worth skyline is at the mercy of the rapidly growing outward population that has occurred in that city over the past 20 years. Metro wise, it probably has a skyline of its peer when you break down the DFW area to just the FW division which is around two million people. I don't think either San Antonio or Fort Worth beats San Jose or Phoenix though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2019, 08:45 PM
 
2,625 posts, read 3,412,268 times
Reputation: 3200
It's not just an issue of tallness but also (or even more) an issue of DENSITY. That is, some sizable-enough cities or metro areas have tall buildings downtown but they are rather spread out (with a good distance between one another) and hence, when you look at the city from a distance, it doesn't or doesn't necessarily portray a look of a dense, well-developed city like New York City, Chicago, Seattle, and others do. That is, there are all sorts of gaps between the city's taller buildings which doesn't cover that "big" or "bigger" city image. One example of this is Cleveland, Ohio. On the ground and when traversing through downtown Cleveland, it looks quite visually impressive and well-developed but, from a distance from other parts of the city or metro area, it doesn't quite convey that "dense, well-developed downtown" look. That is, too many wide distances between taller buildings.

Another example: You pass by Hartford, Connecticut on the expressway and the downtown and city looks visually impressive and well-developed/standout-ish (i.e., dense development of tall buildings along with somewhat shorter buildings). Yet, if you drove by Springfield, Massachusetts or Worcester, Massachusetts, it hardly at all gives the visual impression that Hartford, Connecticut presents. As to Worcester, MA (said to be the second largest city in New England after Boston, MA), you can pass it from a distance or even up close and not see any or hardly any skyline at all. Providence (RI) and Hartford, CT have much more impressive skylines. Even New Haven (CT) does as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2019, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,851 posts, read 5,864,131 times
Reputation: 11467
Baltimore, while not a major city, has one of the smallest, boxy, unimpressive skyline of any big city. It lacks a tower that even reaches 600 feet. It's a shame because the harbor backdrop is beautiful. In all these years they couldn't even get a signature tower that is even 600 ft. It's a tiny collection of little boxes. Even cities like Austin and OKC have signature 600+ feet towers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2019, 09:06 PM
 
2,041 posts, read 1,521,218 times
Reputation: 1420
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Nah, we're good
-
Typical San Francisco Nimby lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top