Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-10-2024, 07:02 AM
 
2 posts, read 809 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSM0984 View Post
Vancouver for sure.

How about Tampa vs. San Antonio?
Tampa but not by much.

Ft. Worth vs. Tulsa
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2024, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
3,959 posts, read 2,271,959 times
Reputation: 1824
Quote:
Originally Posted by LindaOnMyMind View Post
Tampa but not by much.

Ft. Worth vs. Tulsa
Tulsa looks more dense in my opinion. San Jose or Salt Lake City?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2024, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,740 posts, read 9,527,168 times
Reputation: 7329
Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
Tulsa looks more dense in my opinion. San Jose or Salt Lake City?
Salt Lake City by a lot. It actually has some height and building density.

Portland, OR or Jersey City, NJ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2024, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,140 posts, read 14,587,491 times
Reputation: 11427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Salt Lake City by a lot. It actually has some height and building density.

Portland, OR or Jersey City, NJ?
Easily Jersey City.

Jersey City is rivaling cities like Minneapolis and Denver now. Portland's advantage is its setting with the stunning mountains.

Buffalo, NY or Louisville, KY?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2024, 10:00 PM
 
7,078 posts, read 16,814,564 times
Reputation: 3581
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Easily Jersey City.

Jersey City is rivaling cities like Minneapolis and Denver now. Portland's advantage is its setting with the stunning mountains.

Buffalo, NY or Louisville, KY?
Louisville. Better height and riverfront cannot be beat.

Austin or Nashville?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2024, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,140 posts, read 14,587,491 times
Reputation: 11427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post
Louisville. Better height and riverfront cannot be beat.

Austin or Nashville?
Easily Austin, in this current day of 2024. Austin has about 55 skyscrapers over 300 feet and fast-growing, with another 12-15 or so under construction, and 20+ in the pipeline.

Nashville is not super far behind, with 39 skyscrapers over 300 feet, about 7 under construction and 20+ also in the pipeline. Nashville is indeed booming, but not as much as Austin is booming.

Austin is taller, with more density.

Sacramento, CA vs New Orleans, LA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2024, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,740 posts, read 9,527,168 times
Reputation: 7329
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Easily Austin, in this current day of 2024. Austin has about 55 skyscrapers over 300 feet and fast-growing, with another 12-15 or so under construction, and 20+ in the pipeline.

Nashville is not super far behind, with 39 skyscrapers over 300 feet, about 7 under construction and 20+ also in the pipeline. Nashville is indeed booming, but not as much as Austin is booming.

Austin is taller, with more density.

Sacramento, CA vs New Orleans, LA?
New Orleans due to density and larger towers. Sacramento is ok but needs more infill.

Columbia, SC or Little Rock, AR?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2024, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
3,959 posts, read 2,271,959 times
Reputation: 1824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
New Orleans due to density and larger towers. Sacramento is ok but needs more infill.

Columbia, SC or Little Rock, AR?
Columbia it looks more dense. San Antonio or Oklahoma City?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2024, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,140 posts, read 14,587,491 times
Reputation: 11427
Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
Columbia it looks more dense. San Antonio or Oklahoma City?
San Antonio gets the edge here. San Antonio will be getting a lot more infill towers in the future, most likely.

Springfield, MA or Charleston, WV?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2024, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,740 posts, read 9,527,168 times
Reputation: 7329
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
San Antonio gets the edge here. San Antonio will be getting a lot more infill towers in the future, most likely.

Springfield, MA or Charleston, WV?
Charleston wins barely due to it's more classic architecture and density. Charleston reminds me of Chattanooga. It needs more towers but has potential.

St. Paul, MN or Cincinnati, OH?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top