Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Irvine CA vs Sugar Land TX
Irvine CA 60 63.83%
Sugar Land TX 34 36.17%
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-03-2020, 10:44 AM
 
405 posts, read 196,117 times
Reputation: 194

Advertisements

Dude, Ive been to Tysons hundreds of times. I lived 5 miles away. It's not walkable at all. People HATE walking there. A friend works nearby a Whole Foods and says there is almost zero foot traffic, pissing off the developers.

Irvine isn't walkable either, but to say Tysons is far more walkable is hilarious. The only advantage it has is the metro , which is fairly new. I wil take South Coast Plaza over Tysons Mall in a second. The first Tysons mall is pretty dated.

When I said it's like Tysons, I meant the dozens of 10-15 story offices buildings. Tysons is mostly that, not 30 story buildings. They're both spread out office areas. There's only a few of Tysons/Irvine areas in the entire country.

To really be walkable, Tysons and Irvine needs to bulldoze damn near half of the office complexes and start over. Otherwise, it just isn't going to happen.

Last edited by Keyser S; 08-03-2020 at 10:52 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-03-2020, 10:50 AM
 
4,147 posts, read 2,957,888 times
Reputation: 2886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyser S View Post
Dude, Ive been to Tysons hundreds of times. I lived 5 miles away. It's not walkable at all. People HATE walking there. A friend works nearby a Whole Foods and says there is almost zero foot traffic, pissing off the developers.

Irvine isn't walkable either, but to say Tysons is far more walkable is hilarious. The only advantage it has is the metro , which is fairly new.

When I said it's like Tysons, I meant the dozens of 10-15 story offices buildings. Tysons is mostly that, not 30 story buildings. They're both spread out office areas. There's only a few of Tysons/Irvine areas in the entire country.
At least Tyson's has four DC metro rail stations right through the center. Irvine has one single commuter rail station. Tyson creams Irvine in terms of TOD.

I'm not saying Tyson's is Manhattan when it comes to walk ability and transit but it is admittedly better than Irvine. And yes, I realize that Irvine is denser than most NoVA suburbs but Tyson's is a pocket of urbanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2020, 10:53 AM
 
405 posts, read 196,117 times
Reputation: 194
I already said that's the advantage. But the TOD isn't creating foot traffic, because people hate walking there and there's nothing to walk to.
It's not far more walkable. I lived 5 miles away and know what it is. It's not a urban place and it never will be unless half of it is bulldozed.

Have you ever been to Ballston? Or Crystal City? It has loads of TOD. But it's pretty quiet, because there isn't much to walk too. TOD/highrises don' mean urban/vibrant.

This is the center of Tysons . Urban? What?
How is this any different than Irvine?

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9196...7i16384!8i8192

The main street of Tysons. Route 7

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9166...7i16384!8i8192

Some main streets in Tysons don't even have sidewalks, come on. The good thing about Irvine is they're adding a ton of housing to the office areas, so in the long run, it should become more walkable. I just googled, yes, Irvine has sidewalks in the Business center. What a novel idea.


Anyway, this isn't the topic.

Last edited by Keyser S; 08-03-2020 at 11:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2020, 12:00 PM
 
Location: OC
12,822 posts, read 9,536,731 times
Reputation: 10615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyser S View Post
I already said that's the advantage. But the TOD isn't creating foot traffic, because people hate walking there and there's nothing to walk to.
It's not far more walkable. I lived 5 miles away and know what it is. It's not a urban place and it never will be unless half of it is bulldozed.

Have you ever been to Ballston? Or Crystal City? It has loads of TOD. But it's pretty quiet, because there isn't much to walk too. TOD/highrises don' mean urban/vibrant.

This is the center of Tysons . Urban? What?
How is this any different than Irvine?

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9196...7i16384!8i8192

The main street of Tysons. Route 7

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9166...7i16384!8i8192

Some main streets in Tysons don't even have sidewalks, come on. The good thing about Irvine is they're adding a ton of housing to the office areas, so in the long run, it should become more walkable. I just googled, yes, Irvine has sidewalks in the Business center. What a novel idea.


Anyway, this isn't the topic.
Yea I used to live in DC and have been to Tyson's. Yeah, impressive looking skyline, but not really walkable, not even like Ballston or even Pentagon city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2020, 12:11 PM
 
405 posts, read 196,117 times
Reputation: 194
He likes to say Tysons is so much more urban.
Its the same damn place, not counting the metro rail.
As I said, that's very new.

People in DC OR even Maryland loathe Tysons. You would hear commuters complain about working there on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2020, 12:47 PM
 
Location: OC
12,822 posts, read 9,536,731 times
Reputation: 10615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyser S View Post
He likes to say Tysons is so much more urban.
Its the same damn place, not counting the metro rail.
As I said, that's very new.

People in DC OR even Maryland loathe Tysons. You would hear commuters complain about working there on a daily basis.
The Beltway crowd definitely favors 4 or five inner ring burbs. Everything else may as well be in North Carolina to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top