Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-20-2009, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,540 posts, read 33,689,329 times
Reputation: 12189

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweethomeSanAntonio View Post
Okay maybe tier 2 but I wouldn't put OKC, Austin and New Orleans in the same tier as Tampa Bay, S.A. and Charlotte economic wise. Not sure about putting Orlando in their. Talking about the other forumers, clearly you didn't do that.
Oh, OK. I was about to say I didn't do that lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2009, 07:57 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,519,488 times
Reputation: 1444
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroBTR View Post
I sure hope my family physician can prescribe something from this horribly bruised ego I have just recieved. Deacon J, who could not answer my simply phrased question, and could not comprehend a color-coded density map, thinks I don't have a brain.

This has really derailed my life. lol I'm kidding, of course. haha


Anyway I think New Orleans and Charlotte are the best 2 tiers. I want to add Baton Rouge but I don't know if its 2 tier or 3 tier.

Last edited by CaseyB; 06-21-2009 at 05:54 PM.. Reason: personal attack
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2009, 07:59 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,519,488 times
Reputation: 1444
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestbankNOLA View Post
Some New Orleans suburbs, (using your statistics): courtesy of Wikipedia and the U.S. Census Bureau (year 2000)

Terrytown 6,862.8 /sq mi (2,649.7 /km²)
Metairie 6,296.7 /sq mi (2,431.2 /km²)
Timberlane 5,340.4 /sq mi (2,061.9 /km²)
River Ridge 5,181.6 /sq mi (2,000.6 /km²)
Harahan 5,023.5 /sq mi (1,939.6 /km²)
Gretna 4,983.9 /sq mi (1,924.3 /km²)
Kenner 4,659.0 /sq mi (1,798.8 /km²)
Arabi 4,597.3 /sq mi (1,775 /km²)
Marrero 4,493.3 /sq mi (1,734.9 /km²)
Chalmette 4,369.6 /sq mi (1,687.1 /km²)
Woodmere 3,492.5 /sq mi (1,348.5 /km²)
Westwego 3,378.0 /sq mi (1,304.3 /km²)
Harvey 3,329.7 /sq mi (1,285.6 /km²)
Estelle 3,141.6 /sq mi (1,213 /km²)
Meraux 2,447.8 /sq mi (945.1 /km²)
Slidell 2,175.5 /sq mi (840 /km²)
Violet 2,108.4 /sq mi (814.1 /km²)
Destrehan 1,628.7 /sq mi (628.8 /km²)
Mandeville 1,543.1 /sq mi (595.8 /km²)
Belle Chasse 393.6 /sq mi (152 /km²)


ATLANTA 3,921 /sq mi (2007)
NEW ORLEANS 2,684 /sq mi (2000)
What throws off everything is the fact that the NO city limits contain roughly 170 sq mi of water and another 100 sq mi of swamp, so the actual city is on somewhere between 80-90 sq mi. of land. Therefore the true density of NO in 2000 should have been around 6,050 /sq mi-5,377 /sq mi
Aaaah! Statistics my friend.
Laissez le bon temps rouler!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 02:53 AM
 
Location: Baton Rouge
1,734 posts, read 5,705,005 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestbankNOLA View Post
Last time I checked I was making a joke out of my self, but the consensus seems to be laughing at DeaconJ.

Anyway I think New Orleans and Charlotte are the best 2 tiers. I want to add Baton Rouge but I don't know if its 2 tier or 3 tier.
I'd probably peg BR as a tier 3 along with, Mobile, Little Rock, Birmingham, etc.

We're growing but I don't think we've quite shed that small southern city image yet. We're getting there. I say give it anywhere from 10-20 more years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 03:18 AM
 
5,756 posts, read 11,666,363 times
Reputation: 3871
I think the Florence/Muscle Shoals ("The Shoals") area is underrated in general. The metro area is small without being puny; it has around 140,000 people. And quite a few nice parks, riverbanks, a university, and several music festivals each year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 08:57 AM
 
1,201 posts, read 2,356,593 times
Reputation: 717
Default many, ah, tier has to fall...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
I think the Florence/Muscle Shoals ("The Shoals") area is underrated in general. The metro area is small without being puny; it has around 140,000 people. And quite a few nice parks, riverbanks, a university, and several music festivals each year.

you are correct about one thing: downtown florence is an attracive place, for a small city. it is, however, very small, and no where near the level of a tier 2 city. examples of tier-3-type cities would be savannah, ga, charleston, st. augustine, chattanooga, knoxville, or wilmington. see the physical differences and the possible historical and geographical interests differences?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 09:42 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,519,488 times
Reputation: 1444
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroBTR View Post
I'd probably peg BR as a tier 3 along with, Mobile, Little Rock, Birmingham, etc.

We're growing but I don't think we've quite shed that small southern city image yet. We're getting there. I say give it anywhere from 10-20 more years.
Maybe sooner, the current development of that place amazes me. If only BR had the infrastructure too. It just amazes me though how development and land use patterns shift within a 45 min. drive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 09:52 AM
 
7,083 posts, read 12,398,665 times
Reputation: 6470
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestbankNOLA View Post
Last time I checked I was making a joke out of my self, but the consensus seems to be laughing at DeaconJ.

Anyway I think New Orleans and Charlotte are the best 2 tiers. I want to add Baton Rouge but I don't know if its 2 tier or 3 tier.
I agree!!! And based on history, urbanity, and name recognition New Orleans wins with Charlotte coming in second IMO. Honestly, Tampa, Orlando, and Charlotte could all claim second behind NOLA. These four tier 2's have lots of tier 1 characteristics. They just don't have tier 1 size (metro population).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 10:01 AM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,925,291 times
Reputation: 2698
^I'd throw Nashville in there as well. The music industry definitely gives it a claim to fame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 10:10 AM
 
1,201 posts, read 2,356,593 times
Reputation: 717
Talking there "all shook up" uhhuha!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweethomeSanAntonio View Post
Okay maybe tier 2 but I wouldn't put OKC, Austin and New Orleans in the same tier as Tampa Bay, S.A. and Charlotte economic wise. Not sure about putting Orlando in their. Talking about the other forumers, clearly you didn't do that.
well, i certainly see the justification for tier 1...the rest is "real messed up!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top