San Francisco vs. Chicago vs. New York (compared, life, quality)

[*Sweetkisses*]

NY. This is a joooke.

[PDX_LAX]

Originally Posted by 18Montclair

One thanksgiving eve it took me 6 hrs to drive from Oakland to Sacramento. Most were headed to Reno and Tahoe.

That's 6 hours to drive 90 miles.

Try driving from L.A. to Vegas on the friday before July 4th.

[PDX_LAX]

Originally Posted by chitown2pa

Wow...

Isn't it incredible that over FIVE MILLION MORE PEOPLE choose to live in Chicagoland than the Bay Area, even with the weather discrepancy?

Makes you think.

I know. Calcutta = so much more appealing than the bay area. We really are missing out in California.

[18Montclair]

Originally Posted by PDX_LAX

I know. Calcutta = so much more appealing than the bay area. We really are missing out in California.

I know, what a ridiculous premise.

[W. LA]

I'm going with NYC.

[Gerania]

Originally Posted by chitown2pa

Wow...

Isn't it incredible that over FIVE MILLION MORE PEOPLE choose to live in Chicagoland than the Bay Area, even with the weather discrepancy?

Makes you think.

I got a chill just reading that forecast.

[ChicagoBurbs]

My kind of town...Chicago is...

[The Mayor of Mil-Town]

As much as I love visiting Chicago I have to give the edge to New York when it comes to culture and food. Quality of life is a toss up because if you have the means $$, New York is a great quality of life. Both cities are congested, swarmed with traffic, polluted, cold. New York just takes alot longer to get from one side of downtown to the other.

[chitown2pa]

Originally Posted by PDX_LAX

I know. Calcutta = so much more appealing than the bay area. We really are missing out in California.

False comparison. That's a logical fallacy. Try to avoid those when making a point.

[SillySammy]

New York
No comparison.