Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2011, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Florida
11,669 posts, read 17,958,320 times
Reputation: 8239

Advertisements

More Connecticut Schools Fail to Meet Federal Benchmark - Courant.com

Needless to say, I"m shocked. I thought these towns' school systems were supposed to be top notched. What's going on?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2011, 10:43 AM
 
21,630 posts, read 31,226,516 times
Reputation: 9793
Did you even read the article? It says Glastonbury and Cheshire were removed from the "in need of improvement" list. Where does it say they didn't meet federal standards???
Quote:
Linabury said state educators are encouraged that a significant number of schools and districts — 34 elementary and middle schools, two high schools and seven school districts — have been removed from "in need of improvement" status.
The districts that no longer are on that list are Ashford, Cheshire, Glastonbury, Hebron, Killingly, New Milford and Willington.
NCLB is a joke, anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,948 posts, read 56,980,181 times
Reputation: 11229
kidyankee is correct. The article says that Glastonbury and Cheshire were removed from the Needs Improvement list.

The problem with NCLB is that it sets EVERY school system up for eventual failure because it requires every school system to make improvements every year. It does not have a cap. So if a school system has high test scores but has not improved over previous years, they are listed on the Needs Improvement list. Glastonbury and Cheshire are good examples of why NCLB is so wrong. These towns have very well perfomring systems. how any one in their right mind could say these towns need improvement is not logical. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Florida
11,669 posts, read 17,958,320 times
Reputation: 8239
Oops. Didn't realize that those towns were removed from the "needs improvement" list! All I did was look at the title and then look at the paragraph that listed the towns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 11:40 AM
 
12 posts, read 12,549 times
Reputation: 10
Came across this site and looked up one school each in Cheshire and Glastonbury. Out of 396 CT schools ranked on Overall Student Performance in 2010, Norton School and Nayaug Elementary School ranked 22 and 26 respectively. They had an average percentage of 89 and 88.6 students meeting state goals across all subjects

What are the chances of Any Child being Left Behind here?

2010 School Rankings | ConnCAN
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
2,496 posts, read 4,724,498 times
Reputation: 2583
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidyankee764 View Post
NCLB is a joke, anyway.
You can say THAT again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,948 posts, read 56,980,181 times
Reputation: 11229
Quote:
Originally Posted by databeta View Post
Came across this site and looked up one school each in Cheshire and Glastonbury. Out of 396 CT schools ranked on Overall Student Performance in 2010, Norton School and Nayaug Elementary School ranked 22 and 26 respectively. They had an average percentage of 89 and 88.6 students meeting state goals across all subjects

What are the chances of Any Child being Left Behind here?

2010 School Rankings | ConnCAN
Exactly. Even the lowest performing school in Glastonbury scores well above the state average and exceeds goals. How is that a problem? The law just makes no sense. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 03:01 PM
 
Location: New England
8,155 posts, read 21,012,444 times
Reputation: 3338
The Feds fail to meet federal standards. Think about that for a minute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 04:56 PM
 
2,080 posts, read 3,924,352 times
Reputation: 1828
Quote:
Originally Posted by JViello View Post
The Feds fail to meet federal standards. Think about that for a minute.
By God, truer words were never spoken!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 06:46 AM
 
2,643 posts, read 2,625,190 times
Reputation: 1722
The fact that those systems were ever on the list alone should tell you why NCLB is a joke.

The whole AYP premises is ridiculous. It's like saying a baseball player failed because he only hit 78 home runs this season as opposed to the 80 he hit last year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top