Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Couldn't disagree more. The modern farmhouses just replaced dilapidated split levels and raised ranches.
They have have a timeless look with simple angles. The garish 90s - 2Ks turet specials are the ones that already look dated nevermind the next 10 years. Those architects were on crack designing all those gables. The Mitre Saw Era.
You and I certainly disagree on the definition of timeless. I am not a fan of the 90s-2ks McMansions either but that’s not what I was referring to.
Couldn't disagree more. The modern farmhouses just replaced dilapidated split levels and raised ranches.
They have have a timeless look with simple angles. The garish 90s - 2Ks turet specials are the ones that already look dated nevermind the next 10 years. Those architects were on crack designing all those gables. The Mitre Saw Era.
Agree. The modern farmhouse look is an improvement. The only thing I can see being overdone, perhaps, is the white vertical slat siding with black windows. But if you have a Westport budget, you can modify that fairly easily in the future.
The ugly turrets and triangles and angles? No way to fix without rebuilding half the house.
That style is very flattering for that renovation.
All four examples look great. This is exactly what I'm talking about. I'm not sure why anyone would object.
On the 1900 reno, the home to the left is a perfect example of what not to do.
The two on the right look great in close to their original state and should be left alone.
All four examples look great. This is exactly what I'm talking about. I'm not sure why anyone would object.
On the 1900 reno, the home to the left is a perfect example of what not to do.
The two on the right look great in close to their original state and should be left alone.
Left house was new construction in 2007, teardown.
There is an ordinance, but I wouldn’t call it strict. There is public notice and a waiting period and that’s about it. Here are several recent examples from the past year alone. I am not talking about post-war homes. This is something I also follow very closely as a resident and as someone who has previously worked at a historic house museum:
Sure plenty of split-levels and ugly post-modern places are being torn down but none of these fit that description. To me, with each 100+ year old house that is torn down rather than restored, a bit of historic character is undeniably lost.
I have to say, I am shocked at some of these. I can’t believe the town and Historic Society is not up in arms over that 1768 cape. That’s insane to tear that down. The 1910 house though looks to have been bastardized and retains none of its original charm. The 1920 house is nice but I’m not sure it’s that big of a loss. The 1930 mansion is a shame. It’s a beautiful home, as are those 1900 farmhouses. Those are what Westport was known for 70 years ago. They are what attracted rich city folk to the town originally. Sad, very sad. Jay
I have to say, I am shocked at some of these. I can’t believe the town and Historic Society is not up in arms over that 1768 cape. That’s insane to tear that down. The 1910 house though looks to have been bastardized and retains none of its original charm. The 1920 house is nice but I’m not sure it’s that big of a loss. The 1930 mansion is a shame. It’s a beautiful home, as are those 1900 farmhouses. Those are what Westport was known for 70 years ago. They are what attracted rich city folk to the town originally. Sad, very sad. Jay
There could be underlying issues involved. Mold, asbestos, rodent, insect, foundation, who knows. Then you're neck deep in paperwork, abatements, and more paperwork for the planning dept, it becomes a mess.
Easier to just stamp it, move on, and get more tax out of it, why not.
I have to say, I am shocked at some of these. I can’t believe the town and Historic Society is not up in arms over that 1768 cape. That’s insane to tear that down. The 1910 house though looks to have been bastardized and retains none of its original charm. The 1920 house is nice but I’m not sure it’s that big of a loss. The 1930 mansion is a shame. It’s a beautiful home, as are those 1900 farmhouses. Those are what Westport was known for 70 years ago. They are what attracted rich city folk to the town originally. Sad, very sad. Jay
I have to look at the rest but I think they fought Ferry Ln for awhile. Is this the right address? If so where is the barf emoticon?
Sorry, if you've got that much money, you have the money to restore the house that was there too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveM85
There could be underlying issues involved. Mold, asbestos, rodent, insect, foundation, who knows. Then you're neck deep in paperwork, abatements, and more paperwork for the planning dept, it becomes a mess.
Easier to just stamp it, move on, and get more tax out of it, why not.
Seriously if they have THAT much money restoration costs are not an issue. Demolition with abatements are not cheap. In preservation circles it's known as "more money than brains". They want the address, the lot, the view. But the house they want isn't on it.
Sorry, if you've got that much money, you have the money to restore the house that was there too.
Seriously if they have THAT much money restoration costs are not an issue. Demolition with abatements are not cheap. In preservation circles it's known as "more money than brains". They want the address, the lot, the view. But the house they want isn't on it.
Looks like mine but much bigger, I don't need 6K ft. Y(and JayCT)MMV. It's subjective. You're more than welcome to buy something and restore it.
Sorry, if you've got that much money, you have the money to restore the house that was there too.
Seriously if they have THAT much money restoration costs are not an issue. Demolition with abatements are not cheap. In preservation circles it's known as "more money than brains". They want the address, the lot, the view. But the house they want isn't on it.
Yes that’s the one and I agree with you on all points. I didn’t know they tried to fight it. Why these people couldn’t pick any other lot, even on that street, is beyond me. To me, it’s just selfish. Destroying history for no good reason. And the house they’re building is tacky as can be. Money can’t buy taste.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
