Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diet and Weight Loss
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-27-2011, 01:57 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
865 posts, read 2,501,260 times
Reputation: 716

Advertisements

From an earlier post:

Can fruit make you fat? Natural sugar found in fruit is 'fuelling the nation's obesity epidemic' | Mail Online

HMMMMMM... A study sponsored by PepsiCo finds that fructose might be more harmful than glucose; and a PepsiCo official is quoted in the article as saying something to the effect of "Of course this study has no bearing on Pepsi because WE DON'T USE FRUCTOSE IN PEPSI." In grad school I was taught to raise an eyebrow when reading findings like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-27-2011, 09:07 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,557,923 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by roneb View Post
From an earlier post:

Can fruit make you fat? Natural sugar found in fruit is 'fuelling the nation's obesity epidemic' | Mail Online

HMMMMMM... A study sponsored by PepsiCo finds that fructose might be more harmful than glucose; and a PepsiCo official is quoted in the article as saying something to the effect of "Of course this study has no bearing on Pepsi because WE DON'T USE FRUCTOSE IN PEPSI." In grad school I was taught to raise an eyebrow when reading findings like this.

actually if you read the article, the scientists are concerned about fructose as an additive (either pure or in HFCS) NOT about excessive consumption of fresh fruit. The headline is misleading. But then its the Daily Mail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2011, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque
2,296 posts, read 6,283,220 times
Reputation: 1114
Fruit contains fructose the excessive consumption of which is linked to diabetes. There are a few fruits with lower levels of fructose: peaches, cantaloupes, nectarines & apricots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynborndad View Post
actually if you read the article, the scientists are concerned about fructose as an additive (either pure or in HFCS) NOT about excessive consumption of fresh fruit. The headline is misleading. But then its the Daily Mail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2011, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque
2,296 posts, read 6,283,220 times
Reputation: 1114
15%--- eh. A girl who exercises can get to that range. That's not especially lean & fit for a man. He should strive to get to a few % lower. Looking back at the OP he doesn't seem to eat enough animal protein to support all that exercise. Jmo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roneb View Post
Obviously this is one heck of a generalization. 15% for a 36 year old male with his activity level is not out of line / unusual at all. Sure it could be a little lower - it probably will be if he continues his weight training and extends the mileage for 1 of his 4 runs per week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2011, 02:50 PM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,557,923 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemon&lime View Post
Fruit contains fructose the excessive consumption of which is linked to diabetes. There are a few fruits with lower levels of fructose: peaches, cantaloupes, nectarines & apricots.

fruit also contains dietary fiber, which is beneficial to diabetics, and in preventing diabetes. More importantly, fresh fruit is much healthier (including for diabetics) than a range of other foods. Of course it should not be consumed in excess - I just think you can go over one serving a day without hitting "excess".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2011, 02:51 PM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,680,213 times
Reputation: 24590
realistically, fat people didnt get fat from fruit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2011, 08:34 PM
 
Location: In a house
13,250 posts, read 42,770,834 times
Reputation: 20198
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemon&lime View Post
Fruit contains fructose the excessive consumption of which is linked to diabetes. There are a few fruits with lower levels of fructose: peaches, cantaloupes, nectarines & apricots.
Meat contains protein the excessive consumption of which is linked to liver disease.

Water contains h20 the excessive consumption of which is linked to kidney toxicity.

Green leafy vegetables contain fiber the excessive consumption of which is linked to gastric shutdown.

Everything contains things, the excess of which lead to illness. That's why it's called excess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2011, 11:17 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
865 posts, read 2,501,260 times
Reputation: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemon&lime View Post
15%--- eh. A girl who exercises can get to that range. That's not especially lean & fit for a man. He should strive to get to a few % lower. Looking back at the OP he doesn't seem to eat enough animal protein to support all that exercise. Jmo.
A girl who exercises A LOT can get to that range - think college athlete. Very few woman get that low (even a fair number of college athletes would test higher). Sure under 10% is ideal for a younger male, but the OP is 36. The amount of exercise and level of diet control needed for him to achieve much lower than 15% is going to be pretty substantial. It's possible, but may be more than he is willing to or has time to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2011, 05:42 AM
 
3 posts, read 98,831 times
Reputation: 13
it's does not matter until you feel good. if you think you are over weighted then there is need to lose weight until forget about this. but if you want then check out some simple tips and suggestion in yourhelathorbit.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2011, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Toledo
3,860 posts, read 8,450,741 times
Reputation: 3733
Quote:
Originally Posted by adventuregurl View Post
If you are senstive to sugar, as I am, fruit can definately make you fat (as can root vegetables) as they contains sugar, I can only have 2 servings of non sweet fruits a day and must avoid root vegetable altogether :-(. Everyone is different.
I'm sensitive to sugar as well. I gained weight because I ate an excess of calories, not because I ate fruits and starches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diet and Weight Loss

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top