Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seriously. Clinton is speaking out for Obama, so why is George W. Bush totally M.I.A.? Is he really that embarrassing for Republicans? If so, why did they vote him in twice?
As I understand, W has made a conscious decision not to impose himself on the election process, it being a traditional practice among former presidents. That Clinton thinks he's still relevant is his own decision.
W has, in his own quiet but meaningful way, endorsed Romney. He doesn't feel a need to make a spectacle of himself.
GW made an early endorsement of Romney, but has chosen to stay out of the limelight. Conversely, Ron Paul got his ass kicked in the primaries, but the old fool refuses to recognize his irrelevancy. By refusing to endorse Romney, Paul essentially has endorsed Obama. It will be a great day when this RINO leaves Washington.
Bill Clinton has a legacy to salvage. While one could argue that George W. Bush has a legacy to salvage as well, the difference here is that Bill Clinton was IMPEACHED by the House of Representatives. This dubious distinction is one that is etched into history and will forever be discussed in studies of American politics. Therefore, it's imperative that he put more effort into trading in his image as a lying philanderer. Conversely, George W. Bush merely needs to let history play out and prove to the world that a quasi democracy in the heart of the Middle East was ultimately the right thing to do.
Who has it worse? Someone who will forever be known as the man who put a cigar in Monica Lewinsky's orrifice, or the guy who sought to foster democracy in the Middle East?
All things considered, OF COURSE Bill Clinton would force himself into the spot light. He has a lot of ground to make up if he's to have a positive legacy.
This is as delusional as it gets. LMAO...
If there was an election right now between Slick Willie and Bush, Bush might be lucky to win even his home state. It would be Reagan vs Mondale all over again. The returns for W would be laughable.
Even with Clinton's foibles and impeachment, Bush simply doesn't rate against him. Clinton's legacy is solid, Bush's is a joke. Who invites W to ANYTHING? Nobody, that's who. He's a disease...a walking Texas Ebola virus. Romney would rather run through a fire with gasoline underwear rather than be seen with Bush.
All of you Bush apologists, please stop with the damn sugarcoated excuses for why he's not around because that's bullshyt and you know it.
The GOP has two living former presidents and they keep them hidden from the public like leppers.
...like Jimma Carter? I'll take the "leppers" over the fool......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Where is "W"?
