Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:40 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,901,778 times
Reputation: 5948

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pfalz View Post
Not to mention Bernie was marching with MLK. He really cared for justice long before anyone was watching. Hilary on the other hand proves in SC she has what it takes to win; the ability to mobilize useful idiots. And has what it takes to govern; remorseless ability kick them to the curb after they are no longer useful.
Sanders reminds me of an old school liberal; the kind to cared for ALL Americans, not just some like Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,202 posts, read 19,206,363 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
The sources I'm looking at say that 62% of Dem voters in SC were black.

Sanders wisely didn't really bother with SC...Hillary's win was guaranteed there. He has bigger fish to fry.
False.

Bernie spent $2 million on ads, had a campaign staff of 200 on the ground and 11 field offices. He put in the money - not as much time, because he's trying to cover more Super Tuesday states but it's completely not true to say that he lost big (no, yuuuge!) because he didn't bother. He just didn't win over voters, despite putting in the effort.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,224,761 times
Reputation: 28324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Real tough night for Bernie if anything close to the current margin holds. This was expected to be a big win for Clinton, but the margin as it stands now blows out of the water the expectations. The expectation game is certainly big for momentum. Momentum is certainly on Clinton's side even more so now, Bernie will likely need to win at least 5 of the Super Tuesday states, and needs some significant margins in more than just his home state.
Pundits were saying 20% is the number she needed to win by. Looks to be more like 50% now. This is stunning. Bernie is finished.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:44 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,901,778 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Yepp. As long as they don't get complacent. With Trump, though, Dems are going to turn out in record numbers to keep that fool out of the White House.
Uh; many Repubs WILL turn out to keep Hillary OUT, that "fool" thing goes both ways. I just wanna see Hillary nailed for her crimes, she's just "dirty" IMHO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:44 PM
 
1,553 posts, read 925,116 times
Reputation: 1659
Wow, Bernie got a good old-fashioned butt-whoopin' in SC.


Have a feeling it's not gunna get any better for poor Bern next week...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:44 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,960,195 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
False.

Bernie spent $2 million on ads, had a campaign staff of 200 on the ground and 11 field offices. He put in the money - not as much time, because he's trying to cover more Super Tuesday states but it's completely not true to say that he lost big (no, yuuuge!) because he didn't bother. He just didn't win over voters, despite putting in the effort.
More than 71% of voters said they werent contacted by any candidates. More than 60% had made up their mind more than a month ago according to exit polls. There was no way a person who was known by 0.001% of the electorate in SC was going to do well against someone who everyone in SC knew.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Pyongjang
5,701 posts, read 3,221,735 times
Reputation: 3925
Light turnout

Quote:
Voting was so slow, some people weren't sure they were in the right place.

"When I pulled up, I thought they might have changed the polling place. Yeah, I'm very disappointed (at the turnout)," said voter Larry Barker.
Low voter turnout for South Carolina's first-in-the-South Democratic primary | News, Weather, Sports, Breaking News | WPDE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,224,761 times
Reputation: 28324
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Yes, but Sanders gets the minorities in the general election anyway. The point is that Sanders is much stronger among non-traditional democratic voters than Hillary, independents and white working class males. Trump doesnt stand a chance against Sanders when he eats into his base in addition to getting all the traditional dem voters.
If you are looking for a socialist, this election year is an opportunity lost that will not come again for many, many years assuming the Republicans right the ship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:46 PM
 
9,725 posts, read 15,170,027 times
Reputation: 3346
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
But are you the type of Democratic voter who would vote for a candidate as badly stained as Hillary?

That's a whole different level.
Yes I am. I'm a Hillary supporter. I know there are a lot of them too. I wanted her 8 years ago. I still want her to win. (As do a lot of white female Democrats.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:47 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,960,195 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
If you are looking for a socialist, this election year is an opportunity lost that will not come again for many, many years assuming the Republicans right the ship.
You mean the New Dealer is a socialist? Any political scientist will tell you he is a social democrat or a New Dealer. Well anyone with two brain cells know this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top