Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Upthread it was mentioned that white males support Sanders. Interesting that you chimed in now but not then.
I'm a white female who supported Obama in 2008 and support Clinton now. How do I fit into your neat theory?
My neat theory is ( and I am not saying you fit into it) anyone who votes for a person because of race or gender is an idiot and should not be eligible to vote. We have too many problems in this country to vote haphazardly.
My neat theory is ( and I am not saying you fit into it) anyone who votes for a person because of race or gender is an idiot
You accused, without any basis whatsoever, a specific poster of supporting a person because of gender. If there's an idiot in that equation, it's not that poster.
You accused, without any basis whatsoever, a specific poster of supporting a person because of gender. If there's an idiot in that equation, it's not that poster.
That poster made it clear that many Democrat women will support Hillary also. What do you call that?
That poster made it clear that many Democrat women will support Hillary also. What do you call that?
I call it "many Democratic women support Hillary". Also "many Democratic men support Hillary".
What do you call "many Republican men support {Trump, Rubio, Cruz}" or "many Republican women support {Trump, Rubio, Cruz}" or "many Democratic women support Sanders" or "many Democratic men support Sanders"?
In your rule book, which of the above imply gender bias?
I call it "many Democratic women support Hillary". Also "many Democratic men support Hillary".
What do you call "many Republican men support {Trump, Rubio, Cruz}" or "many Republican women support {Trump, Rubio, Cruz}" or "many Democratic women support Sanders" or "many Democratic men support Sanders"?
In your rule book, which of the above imply gender bias?
It seems you are not capable of understanding, and I don't have the patience to sit here all night trying to explain things to you. It is obvious that you cannot see the obvious or you just refuse to see.
It's time for the Clintons to get the hell out of Washington. Enough is enough.
You Democrats have a choice of a criminal or a socialists. Nice choice.
Last edited by Scotty011; 02-27-2016 at 09:47 PM..
It seems you are not capable of understanding, and I don't have the patience to sit here all night trying to explain things to you. It is obvious that you cannot see the obvious or you just refuse to see.
Whatever gets you through the night.
I'm 67 years old, long ago lost interest in trying to understand how misogynist minds work. I will however never give up on asking them to please defend their public accusations against women who have the nerve(!) to say something as simple as "I'm a woman who supports Clinton.. or Sanders or Trump or Fiorina". When women express a political opinion, it's because they're influenced by their uterus or vagina or ovaries or hormones or somesuch...
Sleep well, Scotty.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
