Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL - The video you posted just proved that her voting record shows she does not favor the oil companies!
Also, that's a very poor argument. You are using an ad the candidate you believe is dishonest ran in 2008 to prove that Bernie Sanders is honest. Somehow that doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
It shows her ability to change her opinion when it's politically expedient to do so.
[URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-nra-helped-put-bernie-sanders-in-congress/2015/07/19/ed1be26c-2bfe-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html"]How the National Rifle Association helped get Bernie Sanders elected[/URL]
"As a candidate in 1990, Sanders won over gun rights groups by promising to oppose one bill they hated — a measure that would establish a waiting period for handgun sales. In Congress, he kept that promise. The dynamic served as an early demonstration that, despite his pure-leftist persona, Sanders was at his core a pragmatic politician, calculating that he couldn’t win in rural Vermont without doing something for gun owners."
Hillary has a lot of money to spend to try to poison people against Bernie, so show her you can't be bought.
Actually most of the money she's raising is going to the Democratic Party. Anyway, I don't see how she is buying my vote. I listen to both candidates carefully and make my own decisions.
"Clinton, who has helped Democratic campaign committees and state parties raise money for the 2016 elections, twice emphasized how important she believes it is to help congressional Democrats. Sanders, an independent, is taking a wait-and-see approach."
LOL - The video you posted just proved that her voting record shows she does not favor the oil companies!
Also, that's a very poor argument. You are using an ad the candidate you believe is dishonest ran in 2008 to prove that Bernie Sanders is honest. Somehow that doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Clinton is hypocrite. She whines about being attacked for taking money from big oil but did the exact same thing against Obama and she in fact ridiculed his answer about it only being from employees. And lets not even mention the money she takes from third party sources, law firms and banks heavily invested in oil & gas.
Actually most of the money she's raising is going to the Democratic Party. Anyway, I don't see how she is buying my vote. I listen to both candidates carefully and make my own decisions.
"Clinton, who has helped Democratic campaign committees and state parties raise money for the 2016 elections, twice emphasized how important she believes it is to help congressional Democrats. Sanders, an independent, is taking a wait-and-see approach."
I wish more questions like these would be asked at the debates.
Great, plenty of those are superdelegates and she is buying their loyalty by funneling money from Wall Street and big pharma. They have money coming out of their ears (after ripping off the American people) and the $2700 contribution limit is nothing for them. Of course they are looking to donate more any way they can. Thats not democracy.
This thread is proof we are in the throes of devolution.
We will be fish in no time at this rate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
