Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hillary isn't going to change what has already happened and that's not why she is doing it. Yes, she is trying to steal the election but from the back door. If she can prove ANY fraud in any of the states carried by Trump where he ends up with less than 270 electorates, then it falls to the House to elect the President and the Senate to elect the Vice President. She's hopeful, and I'm sure she has contacted enough Republicans to know the count already, that she can persuade enough of them to vote for her instead of Trump. ANY Republican that votes for Hillary in this scenario is doomed and should Hillary win, the Republican party is DONE! There's not a voter out there that voted Republican that will ever vote for any Republican again. This scenario played out in the 1824 election. John Q Adams won that election although A Jackson had more electoral votes in the general election.
You can't file for a recount in PA just for sh*ts, and giggles, you have to provide evidence of fraud.
Sorry Hill shills, it's not looking good for the effort to steal PA through a recount. If Hilldog can't steal PA, she can't steal the election.
It's time to move on.
Pennsylvania does not allow candidates to file a direct request for a recount, according to the Pennsylvania Election Code. Instead, the filing fee is simply the amount needed to appeal the results.
Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process. BillyPenn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal and present a “prima facie case” showing that voter fraud took place. While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than “beyond reasonable doubt”, it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in court that fraud was “probable.” This is going to be very difficult given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say there is no proof of hacking or fraud.
WTF do they hope to achieve with this recount? They can't offset Michigan's 16 electoral votes anyway.
If they gave wisconsin and PA to clinton, Trump would still be prez
Just give back the fundraised donations already
Updated. President-elect Donald Trump, who was certified Monday as the winner of Michigan's 16 electoral votes, could contest a request for a recount of Michigan's nearly 4.8 million votes in the Nov. 8 general election. If he does, he could stretch the latest drama in a stunning election cycle well into December and close to the Electoral College vote.
In the results certified by the Michigan Board of Canvassers, Trump led Michigan by 10,704 votes — 2,279,543 compared with 2,268,839 for Clinton, or 47.6 percent to 47.4 percent. Trump is the first Republican presidential candidate to carry the state since George H.W. Bush won it in 1988.
So what do you think he should do next? Does this mean Michigan is no longer in question? Does this also mean he can block Money Grubbin' Stein from wasting more of the donaters money?
Trump's massive, bald-faced LIE that there are 3 million illegal votes makes him the first president on record to have lost all credibility before inauguration.
Somewhere Richard Nixon is looking down thinking, "Wow, this Trump guy has less ethics than I do and lies worse than I did."
They say that we have entered into the "Post-truth Era". Trump also wants to make it the "Post-dignity Era".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.