Petition Seeks to Nullify 2016 Presidential Election (campaign, poll, bias, party)

[Three Wolves In Snow]

Originally Posted by Quick Enough

"Here's the Snopes version if anyone is interested'

NOPE!

Snopes has been PROVEN to NOT BE CREDIBLE source.

It's not credible.

Edit: I read it wrong. Snopes pretends that it will go forward.

It's still a liberal wet dream, and libs will still wake up as losers. Again.

[Haakon]

Originally Posted by dothetwist

Johnson voters gave us tRump. Gee thanks.

No running a candidate guaranteed to alienate half the country gave us Trump. Almost any democrat other than another corrupt Clinton could have beaten Trump.

[nmnita]

Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow

It's not credible.

Edit: I read it wrong. Snopes pretends that it will go forward.

It's still a liberal wet dream, and libs will still wake up as losers. Again.

and snopes can't be trusted either.

[FKD19124]

More antics from the bat **** crazy left

Originally Posted by Mircea

While the world is paying attention to theatrical battles over President Trump’s executive orders and cabinet nominees, a largely unnoticed and potentially landmark case sits before the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. A petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to nullify the results of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election sits on the SCOTUS docket.


Petition Before SCOTUS Seeks To Nullify Election

The actual petition can be read on-line here:

http://shannonfisher.com/wordpress1/...andamus.pdfThe

Petitioners argue that, in accordance with Article IV Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, it is the job of the federal government to keep U.S. territory safe from foreign invasion.

The Petitioners claim that the highest courts in Austria and Ukraine nullified elections after "cyber-terrorists" invaded their elections.

They also claim the 1st Circuit Appeals Court made 4 errors denying the Writ of Mandamus. The 4th point states:

Did the Appeals Court Err by Failing to Find that 17 U.S. Intelligence Agencies Under the Executive Branch of Government Concluded that Russia Invaded U.S. Cyber Territory in 2016 to Influence Election Outcomes?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search....les/16-907.htm

According to the above link, the Petition has been distributed for conference on March 17, 2017.

Just wondering how this flew under the radar on C-D, since I didn't see any threads about it.

How do you think the Supreme Court will rule?

[bluesjuke]

Originally Posted by janellen

I thought Mircea was a she. She seems way too intelligent to be a he.

Blatant misandry.

[rantiquity]

Originally Posted by Haakon

No running a candidate guaranteed to alienate half the country gave us Trump. Almost any democrat other than another corrupt Clinton could have beaten Trump.

I doubt that....Pocahontas or BS would have suffered the same fate. The American people are tired of failed socialist policies.

[Mircea]

Petition denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search....les/16-907.htm

Well, there you go.

[Mathguy]

Lol, stupid people likely spent a fair bit of donations and time on this effort which was doomed to fail.

Could have done something actually useful instead, maybe it was a money grab all-along.

[Fleet]

Originally Posted by Haakon

No running a candidate guaranteed to alienate half the country gave us Trump. Almost any democrat other than another corrupt Clinton could have beaten Trump.

Interesting. Before the election, the Democrats were saying Hillary was the most qualified presidential candidate ever!

[McGowdog]

Originally Posted by Mircea

Petition denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search....les/16-907.htm

Well, there you go.

Oh rats. Now what?

Oh yeah, impeach and behead tRump for dishonest tweets.