Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-06-2010, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
That is all well and good, but I believed the Independent endorsed him as something like the most reasonable Republican. I doubt he will get the Indy endorsement this October/November.

On top of that I also live in the district and travel around N. Chatham, Orange, and Durham all the time and I really don't see any notable signs that the political winds are changing that much in the area (they may be I just don't see it). Despite their best efforts Republicans can't seem to win an election in either Chapel Hill or Durham.

Either way we can bookmark this thread and come back to it in Nov.
Definitely will keep this bookmarked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-07-2010, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
LMAO!!!!!

NC-4: Could B.J. Lawson defeat Rep. David Price? | United Liberty | Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government

...and one from Reuters:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS1...10+PRN20100907

"William (B.J.) Lawson, MD, Republican challenger to Rep. David Price in North Carolina’s Fourth District, announces a turning point in his campaign as a recent poll shows that 46.5 percent of likely voters would elect him, as opposed to 46.1 percent who would vote to re-elect 22-year incumbent Rep. Price."

Bwhahahahahahahahaha!!!!!111!!!1!!!

Last edited by summers73; 09-07-2010 at 12:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
(crickets)

This has absolutely electrified the Lawson campaign! The "invincible" Price in his "invincible" liberal district looks mighty vulnerable now. Of course, I expect the Price boys to be organizing rides for intercity Durham residents, bribing them with all kinds of candy for their promised vote (most of them who never really know who Price is LOL). I don't think that'll offset the redoubling of efforts by the Lawson folks.

Just for you Price fanboys out there, an "Uncle Tom" NC State freshman who said he liked my friend's shirt...

LMAO

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs212.ash2/47507_157451674268115_100000098495337_487379_70169 30_n.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,198 posts, read 19,490,239 times
Reputation: 5308
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
LMAO!!!!!

NC-4: Could B.J. Lawson defeat Rep. David Price? | United Liberty | Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government

...and one from Reuters:

B.J. Lawson Polling Ahead of Rep. David Price | Reuters

"William (B.J.) Lawson, MD, Republican challenger to Rep. David Price in North Carolina’s Fourth District, announces a turning point in his campaign as a recent poll shows that 46.5 percent of likely voters would elect him, as opposed to 46.1 percent who would vote to re-elect 22-year incumbent Rep. Price."

Bwhahahahahahahahaha!!!!!111!!!1!!!

Says a Republican company from Oregon LOL


Its an INTERNAL Lawson campaign poll
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Says a Republican company from Oregon LOL


Its an INTERNAL Lawson campaign poll
LOL it's apparently credible enough for CNBC, the AP, Reuters, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
BTW, kind of interesting how Lawson pulled ahead even though there was a 45-28% Dem-Rep split. Like I was saying, Lawson is getting not only Indy votes, but likely also Dem votes too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 07:55 PM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,439,525 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
LOL it's apparently credible enough for CNBC, the AP, Reuters, etc.
Those are just press releases containing the internal poll sent to the various media outlets by the Lawson campaign. It means absolutely nothing.

Until we see a real poll, you and BJ Lawson can't be taken seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,956 posts, read 17,896,841 times
Reputation: 10376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
Those are just press releases containing the internal poll sent to the various media outlets by the Lawson campaign. It means absolutely nothing.

Until we see a real poll, you and BJ Lawson can't be taken seriously.
nice vapid post.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/files/Freedom_Index_110-4.pdf (broken link)

"The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution” rates congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. To learn how any representative or senator voted on the key measures described herein, look him or her up in the vote charts. The scores are derived by dividing a congressman’s constitutional votes (pluses) by the total number he cast (pluses and minuses) and multiplying by 100.
The average House score for this index (votes 31-40) is 31 percent; the average Senate score is 25 percent. Ron Paul (R-Texas) was the only House member to score a perfect 100 percent. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) was the top scorer in the Senate with 90 percent. We encourage readers to examine how their own congressmen voted on each of the 10 key measures as well as overall."

David Price received a score of 15%, second worst in North Carolina. He was "surpassed" only by Bob "Who are yew" Etheridge (D-NC2) who had a 10 percent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
nice vapid post.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/files/Freedom_Index_110-4.pdf (broken link)

"The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution” rates congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. To learn how any representative or senator voted on the key measures described herein, look him or her up in the vote charts. The scores are derived by dividing a congressman’s constitutional votes (pluses) by the total number he cast (pluses and minuses) and multiplying by 100.
The average House score for this index (votes 31-40) is 31 percent; the average Senate score is 25 percent. Ron Paul (R-Texas) was the only House member to score a perfect 100 percent. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) was the top scorer in the Senate with 90 percent. We encourage readers to examine how their own congressmen voted on each of the 10 key measures as well as overall."

David Price received a score of 15%, second worst in North Carolina. He was "surpassed" only by Bob "Who are yew" Etheridge (D-NC2) who had a 10 percent.
Price practically parallels Pelosi on voting record, so that ultra low score comes as no surprise. Fortunately, even Dems are leaving Price's flock in droves.

Perhaps the poll being internal is not perfect and perhaps Price is still leading if a Gallup styled poll were to be implemented. I don't think any of the Lawson crew is taking that chance, however. Also, I don't think that any of us are going to allow Price's crew to have their cake and eat it too. Meaning, we're not going to allow Price supporters the opportunity to point out flaws in the poll publicly yet privately plan their strategy based on the results.

I would've guessed that Etheridge would lose before Price, but that may be changing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,198 posts, read 19,490,239 times
Reputation: 5308
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
BTW, kind of interesting how Lawson pulled ahead even though there was a 45-28% Dem-Rep split. Like I was saying, Lawson is getting not only Indy votes, but likely also Dem votes too.
The district split isn't anywhere even remotely close to 45-28, its far more Democratic than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top