How is Circumcision viewed in Europe ? (Greek, Dutch, culture, travel)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Save for that mistake, FGM and circumcision really aren't comparable at all.
The only way it could be is if you chopped off the whole head of the penis. In dirty conditions, without anesthesia.
How about both are cavemen like procedures, only performed by religious nuts, retarded villagers in the middle of Africa, and barbaric illiterate western idiots who think as parents they have the right to remove their children's body parts!!!
IT IS DISGUSTING, IT IS BACKWARDS, AND IT IS GROSS
In America the trend is reversing but it's mostly because Latinos refuse to have their children circumcised. White and black America just happily chop their children's members just because the jewish doctor told them so, without realizing that they are scarring their children's penises, they are removing the protective skin that keeps the head of the penis safe, sensitive (which is where men's sensory sexual nerves are located).
Circumcised men have usually scarred penises, their head of the penis looks rough it's often dried up and not very sensitive to stimulation!
Removing a part of the male anatomy THAT WAS MEANT TO BE THERE it's wrong, it's disgusting! (EVOLUTION PUT IT THERE, DONT REMOVE IT!)
The only accepted way a foreskin should be removed is when a man has a medical condition in which they can't peel their penis back to clean it. Other than that any barbaric moron who chops their baby's penis just because a damn doctor (most likely jewish in America's case) says so should lose their child's rights as it is just abuse!
In fact yearly over 2 thousand babies die in the USA because of circumcision!
Almost 2% of neonatal causes of death in America happen because MORONIC PARENTS told doctor.... oh remove the foreskin, it's sinful, its pleasurable, its EVIL!!!! this is america, we like guns, violence, race obsession and jesus..... SEX IS BAD! So please remove!
As an uncircumcised euro currently living in the US I have had zero problems with it regarding women. A couple have mentioned it but just because they had never seen it before and not in a bad way, just curious, the others didn't even mention it.
Most American women could care less about their respective partner's penile state regarding circumcision!! And the ones who do are usually the ones most men don't really want to date because they're the retarded kind!
I am a female and my brother is very handsome and he has his foreskin intact (I know because he told me and my parents would never do something so ignorant!)
And in America he was like a playboy! He told me, all you need is decent looks and a foreign accent!
He also said some American girls brought it up because they knew that non-Americans usually are intact and they were rather curious. But no one had an issue, in fact some of them told him it was sexier
There are 3 types of FMG. Removing of the clitoris hood is considered mutilation as well and banned. Amazing how many people discuss this topic and are so uneduacated. You don't even know like most that the foreskin is the most eregenous part of the male penis. 60-75% of the feelings are gone with it.
If 60 to 70% of the feelings are gone with the foreskin, 95% of the feeling is gone with the clit. Barely no woman can orgasm from vaginal intercourse alone, so if it's hard enough for women with the full equipment to orgasm just by being jackhammered just imagine what it's like to have sex without the one part exclusively designed for female pleasure.
FGM serves no other purpose than to deprive women of their sexuality; Circumcision was born out of medical needs to keep men healthy, and it still serves such a purpose when the foreskin is too tight that erections are painful.
FGM is performed in unhealthy environments, against the will of girls who are old enough to perfectly remember being held down and tortured, hot blood pouring down everywhere as they endure having the most sensible part of their whole body cut. (I'll remind you the clit has a lot more nerve endings than the penis, just so you get an idea of how AWFUL it must be.)
Circumcision is performed in a controlled environment, by doctors.
I'm not saying circumcision should be performed the way it is in the US, never mentioned such a thing at all. In fact my country doesn't circumcise men unless it's for medical reasons.
I'm saying circumcision is not comparable to the monstruosity that is FGM, it never will be. Whine about it all you want.
FGM is what it is: mutilation. It's barbaric and hideous, definitely not comparable to removing a foreskin, which is just unnecessary.
Removing a foreskin is also barbaric and hideous. I could care less about ridiculous religions that were established thousands of years ago when we use to trade goats for women.
Removing a foreskin is also barbaric and hideous. I could care less about ridiculous religions that were established thousands of years ago when we use to trade goats for women.
Religion is backwards, circumcision is backwards!
Except for Judaism, male circumcision is a cultural practice, not a religious one. The Quran says that "Allah made man as perfect", so unlike common belief it is not commanded in Islam or even encouraged. And even during the Inquisition Christianity never adopted circumcision. It wasn't before the late 1800's when Americans started it - just to prevent masturbation. Luckily this crap didn't take a hold in Europe.
Except for Judaism, male circumcision is a cultural practice, not a religious one. The Quran says that "Allah made man as perfect", so unlike common belief it is not commanded in Islam or even encouraged. And even during the Inquisition Christianity never adopted circumcision. It wasn't before the late 1800's when Americans started it - just to prevent masturbation. Luckily this crap didn't take a hold in Europe.
Judaism, islam, christianity.... they're all backwards in my opinion and I hold little sympathy for the religious freaks that follow any of these religions.
I am a free thinker.... So if I was to have a son I would never allow my husband to circumcise him! I don't think the guy that I would marry one day would do that since I want to marry a nice open minded guy!
I wouldn't cite british mainstream media as a source!
UK mainstream media is trash
British mainstream Media includes the BBC and Newsnight, Channel 4 News and ITN News all of which are highly respected, whilst programmes such as Panorama and Dispatches are also highly regarded, as were programmes such as World in Action, whilst the more science based Horizon is also very interesting at times.
Quality (Broadsheet) Newspapers have also played a significant role in the British Media, with newspapers such as The Times, Sunday Times, The Financial Times, The Independent, The Telegraph, The Guardian and The Observer, whilst the UK is home to other specialist publications such as The Economist, Moneyweek, New Statesman, The Spectator etc.
The Tabloid press is only one part of the British media and seeks to entertain as much as inform, with lots of Celebrity stories etc, saying that even the Tabloids do report the news albeit in a sensationalist way.
Overall though the British Media is very highly regarded globally.
Last edited by Brave New World; 07-21-2016 at 06:26 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
