Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually the whole intervention was started by France and the UK, Italy followed after because the damage was already done.
And all this without entering in the whole "Françafrique" idiocy that France is conducting, which gave brilliant results like Rwanda in 1994.
Not, it's not.
Saying that the Italian Navy is rescuing people for the Mafia is false and quite insulting for those men who risk their life.
Since KuuKuulgur has no knowledge at all about how all rescuing operations work (otherwise he would not have said that they "were lurking in Libyan waters"), there's no point to intervene in the discussion.
What's even more ironic is that someone from a Baltic country criticises the aid request of Italy, but they are the first (including the dear Poland which refuses to receive refugees but has taken countless billions of aid from EU and we shall not forget that Italy is the third contributor to the EU budget) to scream helps and incite measures to be taken against Russia.
Nonsense alert...
Seriously stop talking like that, it hurts my eyes.
France and Italy have been breaking the rules on free movement for years. Even Germany had restrictions on migration from accession countries initially.
Only Britain and Sweden had open door migration to populations from Eastern Europe. That being said I think the UK is the most favoured destination for migrants as it is a very tolerant place.
I dont think many countries could absorb over 1 million EU migrants in less than a decade without any major problems like the UK did.
Given the awful estates (banlieues) in France packed with unemployed immigrants maybe it isnt such a bad thing...
France and Italy have been breaking the rules on free movement for years. Even Germany had restrictions on migration from accession countries initially.
Only Britain and Sweden had open door migration to populations from Eastern Europe. That being said I think the UK is the most favoured destination for migrants as it is a very tolerant place.
I dont think many countries could absorb over 1 million EU migrants in less than a decade without any major problems like the UK did.
Given the awful estates (banlieues) in France packed with unemployed immigrants maybe it isnt such a bad thing...
Migrants aren't a national security threat though.
This is the main reason the UK will be leaving the EU. People are fed up with the lack of will on the part of governments to maintain integrity of our national borders.
Ok, while I switch off the sensor, please tell me what you took issue with re my initial comments?
The bold part. Sometimes I get a bit carried away when my country is in a thread title, sorry, I never meant to be rude or trollish.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
