Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just to respond to the point about men traveling to foreign countries to find women, they are usually looking for poor women who are uneducated and have no option but to marry a man from the West who can provide for them financially. That is the appeal of those women. Someone who can be controlled and who would be willing to marry a man who is often unattractive and older and is unable to find a woman in his own country.
This is not my opinion, just check the statistics.
There are no mail order brides who are lawyers and engineers, right?
Nordic women are most likely to satisfy the Criteria I consider Cute & Sexy, Hence I think they deserve a spot up there:
Ideal Features I desire in women:
5'7"
124 lb
Silky, Long, and straight haired brunette
Smooth snow white skin
A bit of arm and leg muscle
Vertical Elliptical face with (Major axis/Minor axis)=(7/5)
Warm skin temperature for cuddling in the winter
FULLY WAXED BODY
This is my super 8 checklist for qualifying women who I find beautiful .
Nordic women are most likely to satisfy the Criteria I consider Cute & Sexy, Hence I think they deserve a spot up there:
Ideal Features I desire in women:
5'7"
124 lb
Silky, Long, and straight haired brunette
Smooth snow white skin
A bit of arm and leg muscle
Vertical Elliptical face with (Major axis/Minor axis)=(7/5)
Warm skin temperature for cuddling in the winter
FULLY WAXED BODY
This is my super 8 checklist for qualifying women who I find beautiful.
This is the mean value. I consider a standard deviation of 12 lb for weight and 1.24" for height. If you do not fall within 1.14*standard deviation for both criteria, you fail to qualify.
Also, the criteria is hard coded in such a way your weight should increase with height. Hence, my minimum criteria is [5'5.59" 110.32lb] and maximum is [5'8.41" 137.68lb].
Include this with the other 5 non quantifiable parameters, and you have my tolerance limit equipped super 8 checklist.
Nice statistics 124 refresher course, Eh .
Last edited by Adi from the Brunswicks; 11-06-2013 at 07:34 AM..
Nordic women are most likely to satisfy the Criteria I consider Cute & Sexy, Hence I think they deserve a spot up there:
Ideal Features I desire in women:
5'7"
124 lb
Silky, Long, and straight haired brunette
Smooth snow white skin
A bit of arm and leg muscle
Vertical Elliptical face with (Major axis/Minor axis)=(7/5)
Warm skin temperature for cuddling in the winter
FULLY WAXED BODY
This is my super 8 checklist for qualifying women who I find beautiful .
I interpret your question to mean as blondes go they are very good looking. I am of the opposites attract mode and so being a blonde at birth with blue eyes I love brown eyed, brown haired men, dark skin too is good.
However I do see Nordic blondes seem to be blooming healthy, not too skinny or pale, often with slightly Asian features and high cheekbones. It is a really attractive look. Also the few I have met were very sweet. The woman who was married to Tiger Woods seemed to be really a good person, down to earth, lovely a good mom.
I got tickled one time when a Nordic woman visiting Austin I had just met clutched her hand in mine to walk to the store. It was cultural, not gay, and it was very sweet and endearing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.
.
.
