Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2021, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Green Country
2,868 posts, read 2,822,843 times
Reputation: 4798

Advertisements

Here's a chart I made with the full numbers. New York City has 1 million more people than anticipated and the entire net Census undercount is accounted for by the Northeast.



Fantastic news!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2021, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,169 posts, read 8,026,863 times
Reputation: 10139
DC is lower than I thought it would be. Was hoping it would be somewhere around 720k. Definitely DC hype was big played.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,072 posts, read 14,453,980 times
Reputation: 11257
Wow, they under-estimated a lot of states.

Most striking--

New York - surpassed 20 million, with the estimate off 864,000!
Illinois - population much more stable than estimates reported, only losing 18,000 people in a decade
New Jersey - up to almost 9.3 million! Under estimated by 400,000!
Pennsylvania - passes the 13 million mark! Under estimated by 200k!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,169 posts, read 8,026,863 times
Reputation: 10139
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Wow, they under-estimated a lot of states.

Most striking--

New York - surpassed 20 million, with the estimate off 864,000!
Illinois - population much more stable than estimates reported, only losing 18,000 people in a decade
New Jersey - up to almost 9.3 million! Under estimated by 400,000!
Pennsylvania - passes the 13 million mark! Under estimated by 200k!
NJ numerically growing faster than MA was a huge, huge shock. Must have been a large Natural Increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 02:53 PM
 
14,022 posts, read 15,032,674 times
Reputation: 10471
I wonder if NYS was upstate or downstate miss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,169 posts, read 8,026,863 times
Reputation: 10139
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
I wonder if NYS was upstate or downstate miss.
Both. I also thought it was fishy when they said NYS' population decreased by 80,000 people, yet, more construction was underway and rental units had an uptick an occupancy.

Same with MA... they said the past 3 years there was a pause and decline in population.. when inventory came to 0, supply increased, and availability inched clsoer to 0.

Maybe the Census Estimated need to use new methods. Because it looks like their parameters suck.

800k off in NYS?? Thats a bit extreme. Did they just count everyone moving out and forget to count everyone moving in?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Northern United States
824 posts, read 714,034 times
Reputation: 1495
I think that this census shows that a lot of states that are considered “unpopular” are still gaining population or are stagnant while popular states are just so popular that they add enough population of gain more seats even if states that lost seats aren’t necessarily losing population.

I think the most interesting information released so far is Illinois. It shows that Illinois only lost 18,000 people, far less than the 250k estimated lost. Though it still doesn’t bode well, it really doesn’t seem like Illinois is hemorrhaging people.

In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if Chicago, or at least it’s metro area gained population and the majority of those loses are from rural areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,072 posts, read 14,453,980 times
Reputation: 11257
Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
NJ numerically growing faster than MA was a huge, huge shock. Must have been a large Natural Increase.
Definitely! A big surprise.

Also, they really, really over-estimated Arizona. Arizona was off by almost 270,000! Bringing the actual official population down to 7.15 million.

Strong for sure, but not as explosive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 03:19 PM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,711,672 times
Reputation: 7557
If I'm understanding this correctly, data such as city, county and MSA population won't be released until August 16th:

https://twitter.com/hansilowang/stat...82972813324289
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 03:21 PM
 
509 posts, read 433,985 times
Reputation: 1539
Despite a slowdown overall in population change between 2010 and 2020 compared to 2000 - 2010, it looks like 18 states actually accelerated their absolute population growth the past decade compared to the preceding one. Here are the ones that accelerated their growth in absolute numbers (ranked in order by to what degree they accelerated):

1. Michigan (went from a decline of 55k in 2000 - 2010 to almost 200k gained in 2010 - 2020. An incredible turnaround for the state)
2. Rhode Island (1,073% the growth rate recorded in 2000 - 2010)
3. North Dakota (352%)
4. Massachusetts (245%)
5. New York (209%)
6. Louisiana (199%)
7. Ohio (149%)
8. New Jersey (133%)
9. South Dakota (124%)
10. Iowa (121%)
11. Washington (119%)
12. Nebraska (119%)
13. Montana (110%)
14. Minnesota (106%)
15. Vermont (105%)
16. Colorado (103%)
17. Oregon (100.2%)
18. Idaho (absolute growth was almost exactly the same in 2010 - 2020 as 2000 - 2010 at 100.1%)

Conversely these were the top 10 states where absolute growth slowed down the most:

1. West Virginia (went from growth to decline)
2. Mississippi (went from growth to decline)
3. Illinois (went from growth to decline)
4. Wyoming (only 20% of 2000 - 2010 absolute growth rate)
5. Connecticut (20% of 2000 - 2010 absolute growth rate)
6. New Mexico (25%)
7. Alaska (31%)
8. Arkansas (40%)
9. Missouri (44%)
10. Kansas (53%)

Last edited by dbcook1; 04-26-2021 at 03:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top