Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-03-2023, 07:06 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,130 posts, read 7,581,348 times
Reputation: 5796

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by atadytic19 View Post
That's exactly what I'm saying. You are picking and choosing which areas should be included in calculations to create higher density numbers.

The city, county, metro area... it's clearly defined. You divide the population in that defined area by the sq miles of that area and you get the density.

Saying I will take areas A, C, and G to calculate the average density in the area is a subjective calculation to make an area like the NE look more dense than the west.

It is make yourself feel good science.
This is why I posted the radius populations from a center point of town, for further context with the Minneapolis and Atlanta cores and what the actual tallied population totals are by actual people living in a land area. Someone else stated well it doesn't favor Atlanta because most of the population density is to the northern suburbs, but that sounds like they would prefer to cherry pick. Both cities are inland city/metros surrounded by land on all sides.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2023, 07:13 PM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,816,648 times
Reputation: 5273
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
This is why I posted the radius populations from a center point of town, for further context with the Minneapolis and Atlanta cores and what the actual tallied population totals are by actual people living in a land area. Someone else stated well it doesn't favor Atlanta because most of the population density is to the northern suburbs, but that sounds like they would prefer to cherry pick. Both cities are inland city/metros surrounded by land on all sides.
I think the numbers should be the numbers and taken as is. It's never going to be perfect. Adjusting for any reason adds subjectivity to it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top