Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2023, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,525 posts, read 2,316,290 times
Reputation: 3769

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by walker1962 View Post
12 stories isn't "hi-rise". The other issue with DC is what's availability of land for residential development. I think only a deep dive into changes in zoning since the 1950s, the desire for green space, home affordability and crime stats by submarkets within the district, can provide an estimate of potential population growth.
Internet forum definitions are not official

Anything over 7 stories or +25m is a high-rise per US fire-code. An 8 story building has to follow the same construction regulations a 50 story building does.

FAA is the only other metric where there is an official standard for building classification based on height.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2023, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,724 posts, read 6,715,548 times
Reputation: 7561
Quote:
Originally Posted by walker1962 View Post
If Baltimore can get ahold of its violent crime rate, It will draw more new residents than DC.
Not going to happen. They let the squeegee kids run free and refuse to prosecute them. Most crime tolerant city administration east of Portland. Baltimore metro is also losing population now and wouldn't surprise me to see Baltimore City down to 500,000 or lower by the 2030 Census.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2023, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,525 posts, read 2,316,290 times
Reputation: 3769
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
Not going to happen. They let the squeegee kids run free and refuse to prosecute them. Most crime tolerant city administration east of Portland. Baltimore metro is also losing population now and wouldn't surprise me to see Baltimore City down to 500,000 or lower by the 2030 Census.
They effectively banned it. Enforcement officially starts tomorrow.

Baltimore’s metro gained population from 2022-2023. Go figure.

Regarding population loss. Baltimore didn’t even lose 75k people in the last two census combined and it’s going to somehow do that in 1/3rd the time while at all time high residential construction, year over year increases in occupied housing and ballooning White & Hispanic population?

We can dog the city all for it shortfalls and you can continue having a weird obsession with it but at least bring some common sense to a left field statement.

Last edited by Joakim3; 01-09-2023 at 06:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2023, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,724 posts, read 6,715,548 times
Reputation: 7561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joakim3 View Post
They effectively banned it. Enforcement officially starts tomorrow.

Baltimore’s metro gained population from 2022-2023. Go figure.

Regarding population loss. Baltimore didn’t even lose 75k people in the last two census combined and it’s going to somehow do that in 1/3rd the time while at all time high residential construction, year over year increases in occupied housing and ballooning White & Hispanic population?

We can dog the city all for it shortfalls and you can continue having a weird obsession with it but at least bring some common sense to a left field statement.
No way you honestly think the "let's pay squeegee kids with taxpayer $ thing" is going to work. Especially when they'll still make more squeegee'ing. Instead of being arrested, they're being PAID. It's a joke.

https://foxbaltimore.com/newsletter-...iru-vignarajah

Re: Baltimore City population, it was the rare city that lost people in the 2010s. Its Latino population is tiny compared to other 500k+ cities, just 6% of the city is foreign born compared to 27% in Boston.

It also had a net loss of 9k people 20-21 and could easily lose another 75k to hit 500k by the end of this decade.

Re: Baltimore MSA population, the 2022 metro estimates aren't out yet, but the metro area lost 6,000 people 20-21, and the state level estimates for '22 show Maryland down 11,000 with 21,000 net migration out of the state.

You're entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2023, 09:57 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,525 posts, read 2,316,290 times
Reputation: 3769
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
No way you honestly think the "let's pay squeegee kids with taxpayer $ thing" is going to work. Especially when they'll still make more squeegee'ing. Instead of being arrested, they're being PAID. It's a joke.

https://foxbaltimore.com/newsletter-...iru-vignarajah
https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/cr...rbe-story.html

You get citied if you pay them and it’s banned on the intersection of Moravia Road and Sinclair Lane; the intersection of Northern Parkway and Wabash Avenue; President Street; the area around Mount Royal and North avenues near the I-83 ramp; MLK ; Conway Street.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
Re: Baltimore City population, it was the rare city that lost people in the 2010s. Its Latino population is tiny compared to other 500k+ cities, just 6% of the city is foreign born compared to 27% in Boston.
No one is contesting the city lost population? We all know what’s driving it.

Hold that same energy the next time anyone brings up AA growth in a West Coast city not named Oakland or LA.

Baltimore has a marginally less Latinos than Seattle & Detroit. 46k vs 52k except its Latino population is growing substantially faster than either. Baltimore’s raw Latino population grew roughly the same amount as DC’s (20k vs 22k)

Baltimore is a majorly AA city. They all have disproportionately low foreign born populations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
It also had a net loss of 9k people 20-21 and could easily lose another 75k to hit 500k by the end of this decade.

Re: Baltimore MSA population, the 2022 metro estimates aren't out yet, but the metro area lost 6,000 people 20-21, and the state level estimates for '22 show Maryland down 11,000 with 21,000 net migration out of the state.
Almost every major city had net loss from 20-21. DC lost 20k. SF lost 54k. NYC lost 300k. No one is using 2021 in isolation to project a city population trends 7 years out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
You're entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts.
Your own facts contradict your own opinion

Last edited by Joakim3; 01-09-2023 at 11:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2023, 10:16 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,525 posts, read 2,316,290 times
Reputation: 3769
Quote:
Originally Posted by walker1962 View Post
"Will DC break all time population highs? Without question". That's a extremely bold statement to make given the district's challenges in offering affordable housing, height restrictions and land availability. If Baltimore can get ahold of its violent crime rate, It will draw more new residents than DC.
DC has ~690k at the moment. It’s all time high was 802k. It’s extremely realistic in the next 2 census at the rate DC was piling on population (pre-pandemic). DC has its challenges but current height regulations, affordable housing and land availability aren’t stopping it growing an extra ~110k, those are needed for better QoL.

Slashing Baltimore crime rate would stop the bleeding of population, but it’s never going to outgrow DC in raw numbers short of a cataclysmic regional economic shift.

Last edited by Joakim3; 01-09-2023 at 10:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2023, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,739,400 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by walker1962 View Post
"Will DC break all time population highs? Without question". That's a extremely bold statement to make given the district's challenges in offering affordable housing, height restrictions and land availability. If Baltimore can get ahold of its violent crime rate, It will draw more new residents than DC.
DC is only 61 sq. miles and probably leads America in housing construction per capita. With the downtown DC construction wild card just played which I’m sure nobody predicted including myself, DC’s new construction in the coming years is going to be pretty substantial like the last decade.

Also, just and FYI, DC just officially confirmed they will be trying to raise the height limit to 160 feet (already permitted on Pennsylvania Avenue) up from the current 130 feet. That will allow residential buildings to rise up to 18 floors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2023, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,055 posts, read 19,299,392 times
Reputation: 6917
A lot of people taking these estimates a little too seriously.

These are not real data.

They are estimates. They're often off, sometimes by quite a lot. Unfortunately we won't get a clear picture again until after the 2030 Census.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2023, 01:39 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,148,184 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
A lot of people taking these estimates a little too seriously.

These are not real data.

They are estimates. They're often off, sometimes by quite a lot. Unfortunately we won't get a clear picture again until after the 2030 Census.
And then that won't be correct and we'll argue it again!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2023, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,724 posts, read 6,715,548 times
Reputation: 7561
What strikes me about the data is the impact of natural growth and the discrepancy in life expectancy. The country as a whole had 245k more births than deaths, but about 150k of that in the West. If you exclude Texas, the South had negative natural growth, with 48k more deaths than births. Not just Florida, but Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, Alabama, and South Carolina all had negative natural growth. Those five states are all in the bottom 10 for life expectancy while California, Idaho, Colorado, Utah, Hawaii, and Washington are near the top.

The Midwest is mostly middle of the pack for life expectancy, but has higher than average median age. Ohio and Michigan had negative natural growth for this reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top