Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
For the point of this conversation, I'm setting aside "Redskins" because its use as a racial slur is a different conversation.
I'm hearing (mostly from the far left) that virtually ALL team names related to that culture is racist. But what is so bad about a team named the Chiefs (or something similar). I don't understand why that would be anymore offensive to a Native American than say, the "Cowboys" are to some folks in Wyoming or "Mariners" are to boaters.
I'm genuinely curious what is offensive about this. I would like for someone who does feel they are offensive to explain it to me. Maybe it is super obvious and I'm just missing it, but I just don't get it.
It's not the "left" that has an issue with these names. Actual Native American people find these references offensive. You could easily Google this.
It seems this thread is a poorly veiled attempt by certain people feigning offense at the imposition at actually being polite to other people who aren't of their same ethnicity.
It's interesting. Nobody adopts a "mascot" to disparage it, or because they think the "mascot" is weak.
All teams adopt a "mascot" that they revere, and think the mascot is tough and respectable.
*shrugs* I'm thinking of the Needville High School in Texas, The Home of the Fighting Blue Jays. Because yes, Blue Jays are tough.
So are the Native American Tribes that colleges and high schools and middle schools have adopted as mascots.
So let me ask you this Clara: The Washington Redskins...how many Redskins fans do you think could even name the Indian tribes that lived in the D.C., Maryland, and Virginia area before whites took over?
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 4 days ago)
35,613 posts, read 17,940,183 times
Reputation: 50640
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi
So let me ask you this Clara: The Washington Redskins...how many Redskins fans do you think could even name the Indian tribes that lived in the D.C., Maryland, and Virginia area before whites took over?
I have no idea.
But I think the RedSkin fans revere their mascot, even if they don't know all that much history.
I don't believe any team has ever adopted a mascot they don't hold in high esteem.
For example, the Illegal Immigrants. The rats. The flies. Nobody has them as their mascots, to just disrespect.
Washington fans revere the "Redskins", without disparaging them.
And yet people from the New York City area get awfully upset when we Western New Yorkers say that NYC is not really a part of the real New York State.
Just speaking for myself, I could not care less what Western New Yorkers say about NYC.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.