Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2015, 10:50 PM
 
2,305 posts, read 2,408,334 times
Reputation: 1546

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ7 View Post
It is true, but one we need to live, the other we don't need. No one needs grass in their yards as much as they do food. I wouldn't be surprised if CA started to limit farmers to acreage if it gets bad enough.
The kind of crops grown in CA, like almonds (which are extremely water intensive), are just wrong. By exempting ag from any new requirements and putting the burden on residential users simply encourages ag from shirking any kind of responsibility, whether social or market.

If I lived in CA, I would not conserve until ag was forced to share the burden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-16-2015, 09:52 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,972,033 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by xeric View Post
I'm surprised that so many people are assuming that the 25% cutback will apply across the board to people who are very thrifty as well as those who are wasteful. I can't imagine any city doing that - rather, I think they will target the water spendthrifts and try to bring them in line with what their more conservation-minded neighbors have already done. Also, it's my understanding that the 25% cutback requirement does not apply universally to all cities in the state. Rather, some cities have a smaller conservation requirement because they have already significantly reduced their per-capita water use.
Don't be surprised, because CA will apply the 25% across the board. They've done it before, and I was screwed because of it. CA has no incentive to take into consideration who is already conserving or not. They just don't care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2015, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,945 posts, read 12,282,765 times
Reputation: 16109
I do my part by never watering my lawn. Nobody in my immediate family waters their lawns we just let them turn brown in the summer or in my mother's case, her 3-4 feet of topsoil on her acreage means her lawn never turns brown.. at worst it simply stops growing as fast but still stays green even in mild droughts.

A true progressive would not be watering their lawn and wasting gas to mow it more often. You're not a true liberal if you water and mow large swaths of lawn unless you're using grey water and an electric mower.

I'm not even liberal and I just let er turn brown. I do keep the sidewalk edged though and do my best to keep weeds from taking the lawn over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:20 PM
 
71 posts, read 219,663 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockwiz View Post
I do my part by never watering my lawn. Nobody in my immediate family waters their lawns we just let them turn brown in the summer or in my mother's case, her 3-4 feet of topsoil on her acreage means her lawn never turns brown.. at worst it simply stops growing as fast but still stays green even in mild droughts.

A true progressive would not be watering their lawn and wasting gas to mow it more often. You're not a true liberal if you water and mow large swaths of lawn unless you're using grey water and an electric mower.

I'm not even liberal and I just let er turn brown. I do keep the sidewalk edged though and do my best to keep weeds from taking the lawn over.
I think it depends on where you live. One should not water their lawn in California, but there is plenty of water in Ohio, so water away if thats what you want to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top