Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2013, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Rego Park, Queens
148 posts, read 175,647 times
Reputation: 178

Advertisements

King Stephen (Stephen the Confessor) was a pretty ineffectual king who reigned between Henry I and Henry II. He demonstrated some skill in staying alive, though, during "The Anarchy". His political "merry-go-round" with Matilda FitzEmpress prolonged The Anarchy, and caused his realm no lack of instability, coming close to damaging the institutions/traditions which Henry I established. Of course, he did this in an attempt to cement his line's (Blois-Chartres) claim to the English throne through heredity ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2013, 05:26 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,519,162 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by lerner View Post
The one who BURNT MY GODDAMN CAKES
Apparently I can't give you anymore reputation points, but I laughed so hard I spit soda out my mouth when I saw this post. And I'm not even sure why I found it that funny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 07:41 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,781,638 times
Reputation: 4174
Well, having watched Braveheart several times (that and Shakespeare's Richard III and Macbeth were the sum total of my "education" on English Kings), I'd say Edward Longshanks (whichever Edward he was) was a real ****. And it looks like he let Scotland slip away and gain their freedom, even as both he and Mel Gibson died.

And George III let the opportunity for the richest continent on the face of the Earth, more than ten times the size of England, slip away thru gross mismanagement when they were literally begging to be kept part of England... until they finally had enough of it, a few years before July 4, 1776. Some people say he was literally crazy. I'm tempted to believe it.

My $.02, worth twice what you paid for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 08:08 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,040,586 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Well, having watched Braveheart several times
Considering that little if anything about the movie "Braveheart" was accurate I would caution anyone who wishes to be taken seriously wouldn't mention the movie for any reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 11:03 PM
 
1,028 posts, read 1,121,780 times
Reputation: 622
Edward II?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2013, 07:41 AM
 
1,034 posts, read 1,799,103 times
Reputation: 2618
I think some of the worst kings, just since the Norman conquest, would have to be Edward II, Henry IV, George VI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2013, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Richmond, VA
5,047 posts, read 6,346,699 times
Reputation: 7204
Joffrey Baratheon
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2013, 08:40 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,682,136 times
Reputation: 14622
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2cold View Post
I think some of the worst kings, just since the Norman conquest, would have to be Edward II, Henry IV, George VI.
George VI? Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2013, 08:52 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,781,638 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Considering that little if anything about the movie "Braveheart" was accurate I would caution anyone who wishes to be taken seriously wouldn't mention the movie for any reason.
Are you saying that Longshanks was *not* a ****? And that he did *not* let Scotland slip away and gain their freedom shortly after his death?

Or are you saying that *other* parts of the movie were inaccurate, and therefore we should regard the parts that were correct, as inaccurate too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2013, 09:40 AM
 
519 posts, read 1,023,424 times
Reputation: 929
Mel Gibson was probably the best King of England, before being ousted by Elizabeth II's blood soaked coup.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top