Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2016, 05:48 PM
 
1,519 posts, read 1,773,650 times
Reputation: 1825

Advertisements

Was it because Truman wanted to fight a more reserved war whereas McArthur moved his troops forward and enticed the Chinese to attack? Did Truman blamed McArthur for forcing the Chinese into the war?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2016, 06:07 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,305,664 times
Reputation: 2172
MacArthur thought he was God. When military men in the US get to telling their COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF how to do his job, they're not long for this world.

This was also the second time Mac had tried to set national policy without input from the people who were supposed to do that. His first was at Terowie, South Australia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 06:41 PM
 
9,981 posts, read 8,595,058 times
Reputation: 5664
why ? the short story is that MacArthur wanted to
take down Red China and Truman didn't think it was worth it.
Truman couldn't trust him anymore to limit the "conflict".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 06:46 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,422 posts, read 60,608,674 times
Reputation: 61036
Essentially, insubordination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 07:04 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,305,664 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowball7 View Post
why ? the short story is that MacArthur wanted to
take down Red China and Truman didn't think it was worth it.
Truman couldn't trust him anymore to limit the "conflict".
Mac couldn't "take down Red China", it was insane to try. And it wasn't his call to make anyway, he wasn't the Commander-in-Chief. Except in his own mind, of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 07:23 PM
 
9,981 posts, read 8,595,058 times
Reputation: 5664
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpanaPointer View Post
Mac couldn't "take down Red China", it was insane to try. And it wasn't his call to make anyway, he wasn't the Commander-in-Chief. Except in his own mind, of course.
At one point, he said it would be insane to try a mainland invasion of China,
(quote is in this article) but at the same time:

On Dec. 1, 1950, MacArthur gave an interview to U.S. News and World Report, which was picked up and published in many U.S. and European papers. In it, the general criticized Washington for its refusal to allow him to pursue the Chinese forces. He stated that those limitations were an enormous handicap, and without precedent in military history.
Acheson said that MacArthur, by going public with his views, "had perpetrated a major act of sabotage of a Government operation." Truman responded, saying that MacArthur "was ready to start general war. I was not." MacArthur, in his autobiography, wrote that Red China was already fully at war with the U.S.
The ostensible reason that Truman fired MacArthur, was that the general had disobeyed Truman's order that no one was to make a public statement on Korea without it first being approved by Washington. Author Courtney Whitney wrote that Acheson's State Department was following British orders to have MacArthur fired, that MacArthur's message had run afoul "of plans being hatched in the State Department to succumb to British pressure...."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 07:28 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,305,664 times
Reputation: 2172
Yep, that's what we've been saying. Thanks for the citation. I'm stealin' it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 09:53 PM
 
Location: Sinkholeville
1,509 posts, read 1,796,591 times
Reputation: 2354
Democrat Truman didn't want to deal with a Republican President MacArthur
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2016, 03:38 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,305,664 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuteTheMall View Post
Democrat Truman didn't want to deal with a Republican President MacArthur
The American Caesar? Who would want such a person for President?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2016, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,837 posts, read 24,347,720 times
Reputation: 32967
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpanaPointer View Post
The American Caesar? Who would want such a person for President?
I think that's it.

When I think of McArthur, I think of General James Mattoon Scott in "Seven Days In May". This country is based on a military UNDER THE CONTROL of our elected leaders. McArthur came very close to violating that basic premise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top