Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
12,059 posts, read 13,905,791 times
Reputation: 7262

Advertisements

Ok, from US News and World Report rankings:

Stanford #5, Cal Tech #7 (LA area)
Rice #17 (SMU #56, Baylor #79, TCU #99)


UCLA #25 (by the way UC Berkeley #22, USC #23, UCSD #35, UC Davis & Santa Barbara tied #39, UC Irvine #41)
UT Austin #45 (ouch, our flagship university is beaten by the Tier 2 California schools)
Texas A&M #63 (ouch Aggies!), UTD #143, Texas Tech #159
UH not published - I assume because it was ranked so poorly it didn't get on the list. However, it's #100 on public affairs so let's use that as a fair basis.

Wow, the facts hurt huh Houston supporters?

National University Rankings | Top National Universities | US News Best Colleges

 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:07 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,982,375 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by cBach View Post
Ok, from US News and World Report rankings:

Stanford #5, Cal Tech #7 (LA area)
Rice #17 (SMU #56, Baylor #79, TCU #99)


UCLA #25 (by the way UC Berkeley #22, USC #23, UCSD #35, UC Davis & Santa Barbara tied #39, UC Irvine #41)
UT Austin #45 (ouch, our flagship university is beaten by the Tier 2 California schools)
Texas A&M #63 (ouch Aggies!), UTD #143, Texas Tech #159
UH not published - I assume because it was ranked so poorly it didn't get on the list. However, it's #100 on public affairs so let's use that as a fair basis.

Wow, the facts hurt huh Houston supporters?

National University Rankings | Top National Universities | US News Best Colleges
tell me, how does it feel becoming a troll?
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:14 PM
 
471 posts, read 851,717 times
Reputation: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by cBach View Post
Ok, from US News and World Report rankings:

Stanford #5, Cal Tech #7 (LA area)
Rice #17 (SMU #56, Baylor #79, TCU #99)


UCLA #25 (by the way UC Berkeley #22, USC #23, UCSD #35, UC Davis & Santa Barbara tied #39, UC Irvine #41)
UT Austin #45 (ouch, our flagship university is beaten by the Tier 2 California schools)
Texas A&M #63 (ouch Aggies!), UTD #143, Texas Tech #159
UH not published - I assume because it was ranked so poorly it didn't get on the list. However, it's #100 on public affairs so let's use that as a fair basis.

Wow, the facts hurt huh Houston supporters?

National University Rankings | Top National Universities | US News Best Colleges
First of all, the rankings are obviously coast biased. Second, UT has 50,000 students. The biggest UC campus no more than 25,000. If UT was to halve its student population, its admission standards would beat even Berkeley and its graduation rates would go way up. That's clearly proved by how far UT is from Rice, when in reality if you look major by major, UT tends to have higher rankings than Rice and at least on-par reputation.
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:25 PM
 
14 posts, read 33,892 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
tell me, how does it feel becoming a troll?
someone is a troll because they bring the facts? WOW, you have to be the biggest houston homer on these boards

the fact is much like i stated before, the UC's second tier school's are better then the best public schools in Texas. don't get butt hurt, these are the facts

the only school worth mentioning in TX is Rice but they are private
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:27 PM
 
471 posts, read 851,717 times
Reputation: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBobby View Post
someone is a troll because they bring the facts? WOW, you have to be the biggest houston homer on these boards

the fact is much like i stated before, the UC's second tier school's are better then the best public schools in Texas. don't get butt hurt, these are the facts

the only school worth mentioning in TX is Rice but they are private
You got to be insane. Nobody even knows UCI and UCSB outside of CA.
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:29 PM
 
14 posts, read 33,892 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertobaggio View Post
First of all, the rankings are obviously coast biased. Second, UT has 50,000 students. The biggest UC campus no more than 25,000. If UT was to halve its student population, its admission standards would beat even Berkeley and its graduation rates would go way up. That's clearly proved by how far UT is from Rice, when in reality if you look major by major, UT tends to have higher rankings than Rice and at least on-par reputation.
coast biased? these are national rankings not rankings put out by the UC schools. now you are just embarrassing yourself, you are creating your own calculations on how UT is better, nobody goes by your calculations of how UT is so great
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 27,013,981 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasltx View Post
I hate to feed the trolls, Matt, but despite the growing momentum it has built up over the past decade, UH is not viewed as an elite school. Not even close. UCLA is one of the premier public universities in the USA, while UH isn't even among the top three in the state. California has invested a lot in its university system through the years and the result is a system of universities that blow most other states away. The size and diversity of an institution is not what employers and grad schools are looking at when evaluating graduates.

That said, UH does have some excellent programs in place and is positioned well to expand its profile if the idiot legislature ever decides to properly fund Texas' universities to keep up with its growing population. UT-Austin, A&M, and UT-Dallas (plus private Rice University and Baylor College of Medicine) all hold their own vs. the UC schools, but a state this large really ought to have several more in that category. UH is never going to be UCLA (or UT or Michigan or UNC) but, if it is able to continue on its current course, it stands a very good chance of closing that gap significantly.
No where did I say UH was better than UCLA academically. I would be fooling myself & everyone else.

What I did say however is that the diversity of both schools & undergraduate student population is very close which is a fact.

Pound per pound UH can holds its own against UCLA.

The University of Houston is one of the most racially/ethnically diverse public universities in the nation. Its also 2nd or 3rd largest in the State of Texas.
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:35 PM
 
471 posts, read 851,717 times
Reputation: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBobby View Post
coast biased? these are national rankings not rankings put out by the UC schools. now you are just embarrassing yourself, you are creating your own calculations on how UT is better, nobody goes by your calculations of how UT is so great
Oh give me a break. Everybody knows there is anti-south bias on the coasts. Those are exactly the people who make these rankings.

Regardless, pull specialty rankings and you will see UT in the top 10-20 of just about all. The only CA public school which fares better will be Berkeley. UCLA on par more or less.
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:42 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,067,872 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by cBach View Post
Wow, the facts hurt huh Houston supporters?
You're not wrong, and I do agree with you on a lot of what you're saying. For the second largest state, Texas is terrible at education. The only three noteworthy schools in the state (on an overall basis) are Rice University, University of Texas at Austin, & Texas A&M University. There are good law schools and medical schools and all that but I'm talking about overall.

I go to UT-Austin and I do agree that for the second largest state we come in very poorly here, the reason I mention this is because when applying to schools most of mine were out of state besides my application to UT-Austin & Trinity University. But I can have some civilized decency and not be a douche about it in my posts though to get a point across.

However if I recall, Matt simply stated that University of Houston is one of the most diverse schools in the country in terms of ethnicities and races attending the school, which is actually true though. I don't see what all the emotions are about.

If you're saying the entire state needs to work on its education field and get better schools, I entirely agree. If you're saying that people are worthless because they go to a school that's not accredited the same way as Rice, UCLA, UT-Austin, USC, among others then I disagree entirely.

Last edited by DANNYY; 03-20-2011 at 11:00 PM.. Reason: Tweak.
 
Old 03-20-2011, 10:44 PM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,799,850 times
Reputation: 3774
Y'all back off topic again!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top