Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2010, 09:58 AM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,512,595 times
Reputation: 1775

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Califreeman View Post
There still can by the Diversity Immigrant Visa to offset those concerns. You can increase the cap from its current 50,000.
Not really, there's no way to let in a fair number of, say Filipinos, if we legalize all of the Hispanics that are willing to break the rules.

Unless you are for completely open boarders, there's no way to let in all the Hispanics without discriminating against other nationalities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2010, 10:14 AM
 
344 posts, read 199,877 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcar Overkill View Post
Not really, there's no way to let in a fair number of, say Filipinos, if we legalize all of the Hispanics that are willing to break the rules.

Unless you are for completely open boarders, there's no way to let in all the Hispanics without discriminating against other nationalities.
As long as you follow market forces, you stand a better chance to reduce the problem. As far as a lopsided system...that's already here.

An increase in Diversity Visas would potentially alleviate the problem. They could get preference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2010, 10:18 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,479 posts, read 47,238,069 times
Reputation: 34137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Califreeman View Post
As long as you follow market forces, you stand a better chance to reduce the problem. As far as a lopsided system...that's already here.

An increase in Diversity Visas would potentially alleviate the problem. They could get preference.
Which basically does nothing but increase overall immigration and nothing to stop illegal immigration, especially poor peasants within walking distance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2010, 10:23 AM
 
344 posts, read 199,877 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Which basically does nothing but increase overall immigration and nothing to stop illegal immigration, especially poor peasants within walking distance.
It increase legal immigration and decreased illegal immigration.Crossing illegally is not without risk. If the cost of entrance is deemed smaller than that risk, more people will come legally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2010, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Tokyo (but will always be) Phoenix, Az
932 posts, read 1,965,928 times
Reputation: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkfarnam View Post
Or an Oklahoma red clay road in the rain, during tornado season.
Or in a dry Arizona wash in the rain, during Monsoon season.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2010, 07:41 AM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,336,802 times
Reputation: 2136
I reiterate to the forum members in here:

In any civil debate the rule of thumb is to not attack the messenger but the message instead. That is what we anti-illegals did initially since this issue came to the forefront in this country. However, when the other side does the reverse and we counter and defend ourselves we are accused of being the ones who started it instead and that they are the victims. I have seen these tactics used time and time again in many blogs and forums by the pro-illegals. Best to ignore these kinds of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2010, 08:57 AM
 
3,484 posts, read 2,876,029 times
Reputation: 2354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Califreeman View Post
If he is a convicted felon, I believe he should be deported. However, he obviously is not characteristic of the majority of illegal immigrants that already live here. So I guess if you commit a serious offense you should get deported. If not, there should be a path to being documented if you came here illegally.
What other special privileges should line jumpers receive? Perhaps we should create a special superduper citizenship for illegal migrants? You know one where they get to break not only immigration laws but other laws as well?

Since we're writing about the need to allow migrant lawbreakers special rights why not extend them other extrajudicial rights as well? Hey give them the right to avoid paying taxes or the right to become a public charge and go on welfare. After all they jumped the line and we owe them!



Quote:
Originally Posted by Califreeman View Post
He should be deported if he committed a serious offense.

Also, the whole "spending the time to immigrate" is exactly why we need to change the laws. My mom almost died waiting (medical complications, they lost her visa paperwork). My friend's dad hand was cut off because the consulate lost his paperwork (he left because he angered his home regime). The wait times are too ridiculous.

Why not a wholesale change of the system?
Because the three hundred million Americans of the world can't take sole responsibility for the problems of the seven billion people of the world?

Because we already let in millions of people each year legally? Because the American taxpayer does not have a responsibility to solve your personal problems?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Califreeman View Post
There still can by the Diversity Immigrant Visa to offset those concerns. You can increase the cap from its current 50,000.
We really don't need anymore people here let in solely because they're from an obscure place. The doors have been opened since 1965. Shut them down for a while and give American society a chance to absorb the newcomers.

Let American needs finally take priority over the needs of Mexican peasants and greedy employers who want to bargain down wages as low as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2010, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Oxygen Ln. AZ
9,319 posts, read 18,768,925 times
Reputation: 5764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benicar View Post
There was a goofball in northern CA where we lived that was not even handicapped and he sued and sued and made great money suing on ADA issues until the courts finally said enough and refused to hear him any more. He even ended up in jail for a short period of time for filing false charges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2010, 04:04 PM
 
660 posts, read 1,399,192 times
Reputation: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
I reiterate to the forum members in here:

In any civil debate the rule of thumb is to not attack the messenger but the message instead. That is what we anti-illegals did initially since this issue came to the forefront in this country. However, when the other side does the reverse and we counter and defend ourselves we are accused of being the ones who started it instead and that they are the victims. I have seen these tactics used time and time again in many blogs and forums by the pro-illegals. Best to ignore these kinds of people.
Some people like to argue for the sake of arguing and then there are others that carry it to an extreme. They get a strange pleasure from seeing others get upset or irate even if they know they're no longer making any sense. I've been on the Internet a long time and have seen this for many years to know that Trolls and Flamers are everywhere and seek out places where they can start trouble and fights. City-Data Forums is an attractive place for them.

They seriously need mental help and I'm sure they're not too pleasant to be around in real life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2010, 10:22 PM
 
Location: California
884 posts, read 717,620 times
Reputation: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
I reiterate to the forum members in here:

In any civil debate the rule of thumb is to not attack the messenger but the message instead. That is what we anti-illegals did initially since this issue came to the forefront in this country. However, when the other side does the reverse and we counter and defend ourselves we are accused of being the ones who started it instead and that they are the victims. I have seen these tactics used time and time again in many blogs and forums by the pro-illegals. Best to ignore these kinds of people.
Very nice post chicagonut. Had he even answered one of the simple questions asked we might of had a very respectful and healthy debate.

But he used the tatics as you have described.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top