Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-29-2011, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Maryland
15,171 posts, read 18,570,776 times
Reputation: 3044

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
Ok, I read the OP article again (and perhaps you should too):

...The portion which is now being exploited by illegal aliens reads as follows:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”...


End quote. Dave Gibson didn't reduce it to just birthright citizenship, nor should we. He also didn't bring up "Birth Tourism" (assumed to be under valid B2 "tourist" visas, and thus not an "illegal alien" mother), so some other posts on the topic are out-of-place.

Also, the unbolded sentence is incredibly juvenile...
Of course an article on Birthright Citizenship would include the actual clause. However, that doesn’t change the topic of THIS thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2011, 11:48 AM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,211,674 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
...apparently to divert attention from actually discussing the topic.

Anyone with elementary comprhension skills realized that this thread, located in the "illegal immigration" forum, was and is supposed to talk about abuse of birthright citizenship for the purposes of receiving social welfare benefits.
Wouldn't that really make this abuse of the social welfare system?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2011, 11:57 AM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,325,592 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
So when someone announces here on the forum that the 14th Amendment should be voided, everyone can relax that Due Process or Equal Protection is not at risk? Talk of "Birth Tourism" is also out-of-place on this particular topic, unless the off-site article covered it as well? Of course not that any topics have "evolved" from the OP before (that must be the reason for as many duplicate posts too).



I suspected your account had been hijacked on this second paragraph. Get real, this is the enormous elephant in the room. My post #36 would have got me over 10 rep points if I was specific other members here instead.
Doesn't birth tourism also equate to anchor babies?

I have no idea what you are talking about in your last paragraph. I was merely responding to your remarks implying that we anti's want "unrestrained" enforcement of our immigration laws even if it doesn't fall within our rules of following the law to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2011, 12:00 PM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,418,544 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockmadinejad View Post
Wouldn't that really make this abuse of the social welfare system?
You cannot divorce the benefits of citizenship from citizenship in and of itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2011, 12:04 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,211,674 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
You cannot divorce the benefits of citizenship from citizenship in and of itself.
So citizens committing welfare fraud might as well be discussed as fraudulently exploiting their birthright citizenship, then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2011, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,850,065 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benicar View Post
Of course an article on Birthright Citizenship would include the actual clause. However, that doesn’t change the topic of THIS thread.
Of course an article on the abuse of the 14th Amendment (titled as such) would include the entire clause...

Or am I also to assume that (off-forum) Dave Gibson can't title his articles correctly, and although quoting an entire passage, "feigns ignorance" that it is only about a particular section?...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2011, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,850,065 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
Doesn't birth tourism also equate to anchor babies?...
Dave Gibson only addresses "Anchor Babies" through illegal alien parent(s) in his article:

...How, if we are to once again become a nation of laws, can we end the practice of ‘birthright citizenship’ for the children of those who enter this nation illegally?...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2011, 12:20 PM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,418,544 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockmadinejad View Post
So citizens committing welfare fraud might as well be discussed as fraudulently exploiting their birthright citizenship, then.

Sure, but we have an obligation to deal with them because they are indigenously "ours."

If I have a deadbeat son my obligation to him is understood as a given. I do not have to also raise and feed and clothe the children of squatters in my spare bedroom because the law says I need to take care of all children in my household.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2011, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,850,065 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
...Anyone with elementary comprhension skills realized that this thread, located in the "illegal immigration" forum, was and is supposed to talk about abuse of birthright citizenship for the purposes of receiving social welfare benefits.
Ok, put another way, let's take an example of an unmarried citizen mother doesn't otherwise qualify for welfare, until she has a baby. Obtaining welfare benefits through that child can be misused in the same manner, but isn't a question of fraud stemming from the baby's "birthright citizenship"? Why should I as a taxpayer, be on the hook more for a U.S. citizen committing fraud in the same way as an illegal alien mother?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2011, 01:26 PM
 
9,240 posts, read 8,673,111 times
Reputation: 2225
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
Tourist are not citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top