Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-14-2024, 09:15 AM
 
106,573 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeApelido View Post
Use leverage only when a product has been overbought / oversold, then after it corrects somewhat move back to unleveraged funds.
the forbes 400 still have an open slot for their first market timer who can actually call these stages.

which is why we use portfolios that we can hold thru good and bad times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-14-2024, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Florida
2,327 posts, read 2,276,900 times
Reputation: 3592
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
the forbes 400 still have an open slot for their first market timer who can actually call these stages.

which is why we use portfolios that we can hold thru good and bad times
There are a lot of successful fund managers on the Forbes 400.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2024, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Florida
2,327 posts, read 2,276,900 times
Reputation: 3592
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
once a month… i just add a bit to bring up the ones to low for now rather then sell anything .

it really hasn’t been off more then a few hundred at the most.

rebalancing is important with these portfolios because of the risk parity.

you can let them run longer and set rebalance bands but jury is still out on what’s best
Good deal, I like the idea here but I sure don’t trust any one ETF. My assumption, in the interest of caution, is that they’ll all go to 0 at some point so I’ve always rebalanced out as they’ve run up.

I like the Carolina Reaper portfolio and may allocate some capital to it. I need to independently test more first though. So far my numbers aren’t aligning with PortfolioVisualizer.

I also want to experiment with other options, like adding NUGT into the mix if it adds utility to the portfolio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2024, 03:29 PM
 
106,573 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
you have a few versions here

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2024, 03:40 PM
 
7,734 posts, read 3,778,838 times
Reputation: 14609
Quote:
Originally Posted by FL_Expert View Post
Do you plan on rebalancing over time?
You have to change your mindset a bit. Under normal rebalancing, you rebalance assets to your target percentages.

With a Risk Parity portfolio, you are not rebalancing assets in the normal sense - you are rebalancing RISK so that different asset classes have - wait for it - risk PARITY (as in, risk equality).

For some people it takes a while to fully comprehend the implication of risk PARITY.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2024, 03:49 PM
 
106,573 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
Quote:
Originally Posted by moguldreamer View Post
You have to change your mindset a bit. Under normal rebalancing, you rebalance assets to your target percentages.

With a Risk Parity portfolio, you are not rebalancing assets in the normal sense - you are rebalancing RISK so that different asset classes have - wait for it - risk PARITY (as in, risk equality).

For some people it takes a while to fully comprehend the implication of risk PARITY.
this portfolio is easy because the actual risk parity is done by dbmf in dbmf .

my job is making sure we stay around .20 cents of each dollar in upro equaling 60% in equities , .133 cents in tyd bonds so there is a 60/40 allocation n function with the 3x funds and .67 cents in dbmf where they handle the risk parity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2024, 03:45 AM
 
106,573 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
one thing i want to add is dbmf is not a leveraged fund like the others where it produces 3x what the underlying holdings do .

that is why we have .66 cents per dollar going into dbmf .

it needs 2x the money the stocks and bonds do so it can provide the risk parity with enough oomph .

so in this model the dollar weighting when you rebalance is pretty traditional as you just rebalance back to the original percentages in each .

dbmf is the largest holding by dollars yet the upro and tyd have more power for movement being 3x funds but they are just hedged enough to keep a tight range on portfolio movement .

it is a crazy use for these extremely volatile funds when each is used alone but very docile when it works together as one portfolio.

it takes daily swings of 3-5% in upro or tyd and makes it like watching paint dry most days

20% upro

13.333% tyd

66.667% in dbmf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2024, 11:42 AM
 
106,573 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
interesting that the carolina reaper portfolio is actually named for the hottest known pepper in the world .

it clocks in at 2.2 million scovile heat units , compared to 2500 for a jalapeño and 100,000 for a habanero
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2024, 02:49 AM
 
156 posts, read 47,669 times
Reputation: 117
I watched a Macro Alf video recently on risk parity portfolios. The leveraged funds let you gain exposure to whatever you need without consuming so much cash. I scribbled down his numbers somewhere, it was something like 30% bonds, 30% dollar, 30% equities, some gold, and others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2024, 03:14 AM
 
106,573 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
there are lots of different portfolios.

but be careful with ones like you mentioned .

the permanent portfolio has been around for 50 years and is

25% gold

25% cash

25% long term treasuries

25% equities .

mostly all asset classes moved down together and got hammered in 2022 .

so 3 out of 4 asset classes reacted very poorly to rising rates and were down badly

a true risk parity portfolio uses short and long contracts to actually hedge and not count on the supposed see saw action of various asset classes , which really have no see saw action to begin with.

in the carolina reaper there are future contracts being used to actually act like a hedge fund could.

2022 showed that even in what was known as a risk parity portfolio, the permanent portfolio and golden butterfly portfolio really had no risk parity going on
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top