Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-17-2013, 05:54 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,811,791 times
Reputation: 5478

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_nlv View Post
Dirty Secret Of Improved Housing Market

Home prices rising. Inventories falling. Glory days are here again.

But there’s a dirty little secret behind this recovery – big banks see an opportunity to get some of their money back.

The Mortgage Bankers Association says foreclosures are back on the rise. In fact, bank repossessions of homes rose 11-percent in May compared to the month earlier. Default notices were also higher.

And researchers explain this is happening for the very same reason that you’ve been feeling good about things – rising prices.

In this case, we need to think of banks as homeowners. Really big ones. And they want to unload troubled properties in a strong market after sitting on them for years.

Rising prices give them a chance to do that without losing as much money.

But of course foreclosures hurt home prices. And that could slow the housing recovery.

And the wheel goes ‘round.

Unfortunately this trend is not the only storm cloud hanging over the market.

Just look at mortgage rates. They’re already on the rise, topping 4-percent in the latest week for the first time in more than a year.

And economists fear they could keep rising.
Foreclosures hurt housing prices because the banks elected to sell them at absurdly low prices. If the banks elect to sell them at what the market will bear there would be no appreciable damage from more foreclosure...though perhaps more inventory which might slow the rise.

And the banks still own relatively few houses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-17-2013, 07:14 PM
 
244 posts, read 332,496 times
Reputation: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
Foreclosures hurt housing prices because the banks elected to sell them at absurdly low prices. If the banks elect to sell them at what the market will bear there would be no appreciable damage from more foreclosure...though perhaps more inventory which might slow the rise.

And the banks still own relatively few houses.
There are no foreclosures coming, the new legislation basically cancels itself out as the other new legislation makes it very easy for a defaulting homeowner to delay foreclosure for a very long time. Banks and new home builders will benefit. Big losers are the real estate agents who will be resigned to door-to-door soliciting for listings.

In the effort to save Nevadan homeownership, the devil has once more taken refuge in his most secure redoubt - the details.

Meanwhile, JAWS is circling Bernanke and QE kablooey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 07:47 PM
 
92 posts, read 114,780 times
Reputation: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasVicsezhowdy View Post
There are no foreclosures coming, the new legislation basically cancels itself out as the other new legislation makes it very easy for a defaulting homeowner to delay foreclosure for a very long time. Banks and new home builders will benefit. Big losers are the real estate agents who will be resigned to door-to-door soliciting for listings.

In the effort to save Nevadan homeownership, the devil has once more taken refuge in his most secure redoubt - the details.

Meanwhile, JAWS is circling Bernanke and QE kablooey.
I think Bernanake will be forced to stop buying mortgage backed securities and stop supporting housing market not because our economy is improving, but because he is creating another dangerous monster in housing that can take the entire country down again.

We haven't fixed anything since 2008 except igniting another round of rampant speculation in the stock market and now again in the housing market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 08:39 PM
 
3,598 posts, read 4,951,640 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_nlv View Post
I think Bernanake will be forced to stop buying mortgage backed securities and stop supporting housing market not because our economy is improving, but because he is creating another dangerous monster in housing that can take the entire country down again.

We haven't fixed anything since 2008 except igniting another round of rampant speculation in the stock market and now again in the housing market.
...or you could be completely and entirely WRONG. Have you considered that as even a remote possibility?

Analysis: The Myth of the US Housing Bubble - WORLD PROPERTY CHANNEL Global News Center
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 08:52 PM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,554,759 times
Reputation: 1882
Quote:
Originally Posted by logline View Post
...or you could be completely and entirely WRONG. Have you considered that as even a remote possibility?

Analysis: The Myth of the US Housing Bubble - WORLD PROPERTY CHANNEL Global News Center
I think the caution is warranted but the risk is minimal for those buying a property for their own occupancy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 09:17 PM
 
244 posts, read 332,496 times
Reputation: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrhazy View Post
I think the caution is warranted but the risk is minimal for those buying a property for their own occupancy.
Unfortunately, that percentage constitutes the minority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 09:22 PM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,554,759 times
Reputation: 1882
Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasVicsezhowdy View Post
Unfortunately, that percentage constitutes the minority.
I didn't know 50% was a minority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 09:30 PM
 
244 posts, read 332,496 times
Reputation: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrhazy View Post
I didn't know 50% was a minority.
No point arguing any more, if you want to buy a house NOW then by all means have at it. Personally, I don't think it is a prudent idea unless it is sitting on agriculturally viable soil and has a private water supply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 10:10 PM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,554,759 times
Reputation: 1882
Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasVicsezhowdy View Post
No point arguing any more, if you want to buy a house NOW then by all means have at it. Personally, I don't think it is a prudent idea unless it is sitting on agriculturally viable soil and has a private water supply.
What's to argue about? You made a statement saying owner occupant purchasers are in the minority and that's not what I'm seeing in the LV market.

As far as people buying a house, it all depends on their own situation. If they are going to live in LV for over 3 years it's generally viewed better to purchase than to rent. Now if you are able to live in LV and live with parents or friends or some other abnormal situation, that is an exception.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2013, 02:20 AM
 
92 posts, read 114,780 times
Reputation: 72
Las Vegas Home Sales Activity for 2002
Median Price of a new Las Vegas home $186,827
Median Price of a resale Las Vegas home $157,000

May 2013
Median Price of a new Las Vegas home $240,000
Median Price of a resale Las Vegas home $170,000

When did the housing bubble begin in Las Vegas, 2001, 2002, 2003 ????!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top