Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2008, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Little Babylon
5,072 posts, read 9,145,674 times
Reputation: 2612

Advertisements

Well it's not like the Island is really dependent on oil for anything.

And don't forget those two 100 foot high wind turbines pumping our an awesome 50 kilowatts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2008, 10:35 AM
 
9,341 posts, read 29,685,492 times
Reputation: 4573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kbinspections View Post
With China and India emerging, the US needs to come up with an energy policy that works and quick. Right now our energy policy is a list of things we can't do. Can't drill in Alaska, can't drill on the west coast off shore. Can't build refineries without a 10 year battle of red tape. What can we do?


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2008, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Little Babylon
5,072 posts, read 9,145,674 times
Reputation: 2612
Touche'

9876543210
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2008, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Kings Park & Jamesport
3,180 posts, read 10,543,677 times
Reputation: 1092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Greenspan View Post
100% correct!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2008, 11:43 AM
 
245 posts, read 298,585 times
Reputation: 43
Default Something is missing...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kbinspections View Post
100% correct!
What is accurate about the cartoon is that it doesn't show the energy companies championing clean energy supplies. I don't know enough about wind, water, geo-thermal, solar to know what amount of energy they could produce, but these are options. Do they cost something? Yes. It seems to me the public wants clean energy. Drive around rural Germany and you see wind energy being harnessed. While they rely on Russia for a lot of fossil energy, they do try to offset that need with domestic supplies. Wind provides Germany with 6% of its needs. Nearby Denmark gets 19% of its needs from wind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2008, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Kings Park & Jamesport
3,180 posts, read 10,543,677 times
Reputation: 1092
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYNewbie View Post
What is accurate about the cartoon is that it doesn't show the energy companies championing clean energy supplies. I don't know enough about wind, water, geo-thermal, solar to know what amount of energy they could produce, but these are options. Do they cost something? Yes. It seems to me the public wants clean energy. Drive around rural Germany and you see wind energy being harnessed. While they rely on Russia for a lot of fossil energy, they do try to offset that need with domestic supplies. Wind provides Germany with 6% of its needs. Nearby Denmark gets 19% of its needs from wind.
Correct, but the US won't go with wind. Plus, where wind makes sense, no one lives there......so now you need transmission lines, which no one wants.

Shell did spend 5 billion on biofuels.......just to conclude they don't work. They spend alot of money trying to find more oil that,then they can't drill.

Like or not, fossil fuels will be our #1 source for decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2008, 12:07 PM
 
9,341 posts, read 29,685,492 times
Reputation: 4573
The solution is more nuclear to produce cheaper electricity, some of which would be used to liquefy coal that would replace gasoline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2008, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Little Babylon
5,072 posts, read 9,145,674 times
Reputation: 2612
A good place for wind farms would be off Jones Beach. Has anybody thought of that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2008, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Kings Park & Jamesport
3,180 posts, read 10,543,677 times
Reputation: 1092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Greenspan View Post
The solution is more nuclear to produce cheaper electricity, some of which would be used to liquefy coal that would replace gasoline.
Coal is a great option,we have alot, but expensive to liquefy or gasification. It maybe the answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2008, 04:07 PM
 
1,058 posts, read 3,488,366 times
Reputation: 229
It is good to hear that other posters have some common sense about America's energy problem. NUCLEAR POWER is the only viable solution right now to meet our growing energy demands. Wind, Geothermal, solar and biofuels are not enough. We also need to open up Alaska to oil drilling as well as areas off the coast -

Maybe when gasoline hits $4.00/gallon the public will come to their senses about nuclear power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top