Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-10-2017, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Cleveland and Columbus OH
11,061 posts, read 12,452,032 times
Reputation: 10385

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
Cape Cod population peaked in 2000. It's been fairly flat since. It's the story of anywhere not urban. Aging population. Low birth rates. The Cape sees enough retiree migration that the population isn't likely to shrink. It's just going to continue to do the "White Florida" thing.

All high cost of living places have outward migration of middle/lower middle class people who can't afford it. The inward migration tends to be high skill people and the draw is worldwide. Your new neighbor is just as likely to come from Bangalore as Des Moines.
But also a high inward migration of very poor immigrants and students, funded by federal dollars in many cases (not all).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-14-2017, 11:13 PM
 
3,076 posts, read 5,651,187 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdovell View Post
True but here's more exact numbers.

1950 801,444 +4.0%
1960 697,197 −13.0%
1970 641,071 −8.1%
1980 562,994 −12.2%
1990 574,283 +2.0%
2000 589,141 +2.6%
2010 617,594 +4.8%
2016 673,184 +9.0%

Right about that. It isn't anywhere close to what it was in 1950 and is still lower than 1960. It hit a bottom in 1980 and growth certainly is on the upward swing, I get that. But we can't ignore the fact that it is taking so long to get back to what it was. 56 years to get close to where it was in 1960. People left and the 128 belt was made and then 495.
Thanks for proving my point, that Massachusetts population hasn't increased much since the 1980's. And they haven't built much since then (look at the suburbs around Boston). Its basically the fact that a lack of housing (supply) determines the price of housing. They refuse to build and its difficult so costs will stay up. It doesn't mean people are dying to move to Boston. In general, the high cost of Boston and the Northeast area has kept the middle class away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2017, 09:19 AM
 
14,022 posts, read 15,022,389 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeavingMA View Post
Thanks for proving my point, that Massachusetts population hasn't increased much since the 1980's. And they haven't built much since then (look at the suburbs around Boston). Its basically the fact that a lack of housing (supply) determines the price of housing. They refuse to build and its difficult so costs will stay up. It doesn't mean people are dying to move to Boston. In general, the high cost of Boston and the Northeast area has kept the middle class away.
The population of Massachusetts has gone up 1.1 million from 1980 to 2016 and NH another 450,000. That's 6.6 to 8.2 million that's significant growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2017, 10:29 AM
 
Location: New England
2,190 posts, read 2,233,403 times
Reputation: 1969
I feel as if some of the decrease, or lack of an increase, is an increase in living standards. Kids sharing rooms used to be the norm, now many people believe that every child should have their own room.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2017, 07:26 AM
 
1,642 posts, read 1,400,099 times
Reputation: 1316
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdovell View Post
If you factor out immigrant the Boston area has lost population for well over a decade. There are many towns that frankly are going to die out without some new influx or increase to the birthrate. Cape Cod comes to mind and the Berkshires.
Why would we factor out immigrants?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2017, 07:38 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,962,945 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_General View Post
Why would we factor out immigrants?

Seriously, one of my closest friends is a chemist in Kendall Sq. She is a Scottish immigrant. Why would she not count?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2017, 07:24 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,259,472 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Seriously, one of my closest friends is a chemist in Kendall Sq. She is a Scottish immigrant. Why would she not count?
<sarcasm>

Because all immigrants have poor English language skills and work low wage jobs.

</sarcasm>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2017, 04:09 PM
 
880 posts, read 820,223 times
Reputation: 907
It would be fair to say the job growth in Boston has come from tech and biotech. 2 sectors which rely heavily on legal immigration (overseas students staying in USA to work)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2017, 06:54 PM
 
7,925 posts, read 7,818,729 times
Reputation: 4152
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Seriously, one of my closest friends is a chemist in Kendall Sq. She is a Scottish immigrant. Why would she not count?
Because we are losing both legal and illegal immigrants (or aliens if you prefer) post 9/11 with the whole fortress mentality. I don't like it myself.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/business...1yO/story.html

The labor market is extremely tight right now. Plenty of industries can't find people or at least the right people. I'd argue that pretty much anyone that wants to work is working.

My point is that maybe it might not be in the best of long term sustainability to rely on immigrants. If the president stays on for all four or even eight years we're in for some serious wage inflation. I've seen projects delayed months if not years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2017, 07:40 PM
 
9,882 posts, read 7,212,572 times
Reputation: 11472
Well Marty Walsh released that Boston's bid for Amazon will center on East Boston, not too far from Logan which means Suffolk Downs.

Worcester has come up with a $500 million tax incentive plan over 20 years and a 98 acre site around Rt. 20.

Somerville, Lynn, Greater Lowell/Billerica, Greater Lawrence/North Andover, Leominster, Fall River, Foxborough, New Bedford, Taunton, and Springfield/Enfield, CT have all proposed plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top