Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-04-2019, 09:44 AM
 
Location: close to home
6,203 posts, read 3,546,961 times
Reputation: 4761

Advertisements

Including pertinent excerpts, since most people are not inclined to actually read anything these days....

"...increasing the tax rate on those earning more than $1 million per year, which would affect approximately 18,000 in-state residents and 19,000 non-state residents." I checked. There were roughly 8.9 million people living in NJ in 2018.

"The credit would be in addition to other existing property tax relief programs – Homestead Benefit, Senior Freeze, Veterans' Deduction, and the increased Property Tax Deduction Cap – while impacting a much broader base. An estimated 2,013,049 New Jersey income tax filers are expected to benefit, which represents roughly 46 percent of all resident returns."

https://patch.com/new-jersey/lawrenc...campaign=alert
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2019, 09:50 AM
 
19,126 posts, read 25,331,967 times
Reputation: 25434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hannah5555 View Post
I checked. There were roughly 8.9 million people living in NJ in 2018.
That's not possible!
Didn't you know that almost everyone has already left NJ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2019, 10:02 AM
 
Location: close to home
6,203 posts, read 3,546,961 times
Reputation: 4761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retriever View Post
That's not possible!
Didn't you know that almost everyone has already left NJ?
I need to not be drinking coffee when I read your posts .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2019, 10:04 AM
 
5,301 posts, read 6,181,559 times
Reputation: 5491
Top NJ income tax rate would be 10.75%. I remember when Gov. Byrne's new income tax imposition had a top rate of 3.5%.


Expect an exodus of NJ high earners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2019, 10:09 AM
 
Location: MMU->ABE->ATL->ASH
9,317 posts, read 21,004,968 times
Reputation: 10443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells5 View Post


Expect an exodus of NJ high earners.
Population of Florida is about to be come 10,000 Bigger....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2019, 04:57 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,213,191 times
Reputation: 10894
So Murphy ran on higher taxes and legal pot, and is only willing to actually push for higher taxes. Surprise, surprise, surprise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2019, 05:53 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
4,181 posts, read 5,062,478 times
Reputation: 4233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells5 View Post
Expect an exodus of NJ high earners.

So you think that their salaries will be the same wherever they move to ?


More likely than moving: they'll hire better accountants, and not pay their fair share, like all wealthy people do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2019, 08:59 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,661,093 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
So Murphy ran on higher taxes and legal pot, and is only willing to actually push for higher taxes. Surprise, surprise, surprise.
Yup and food for thought, US Citizens paid almost 90 Billion more in taxes after the trump tax laws.


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ameri...194900782.html

Despite the majority of Americans receiving a tax cut, the IRS pulled in an additional $93 billion for 2018 from taxpayers on individual income taxes than it did for 2017, according to new data from the IRS. This is in part thanks to the Treasury Department processing 1.5% more individual returns for 2018 than 2017.

After the passage of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the IRS encouraged taxpayers to update their withholdings, but few did. More than halfway through 2018, after the law took effect, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) warned that more Americans would owe money to the IRS under the new law while those receiving refunds would decrease. In the end, many Americans saw modest increases in their paychecks throughout the year, but didn’t notice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2019, 09:01 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,661,093 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by JG183 View Post
So you think that their salaries will be the same wherever they move to ?


More likely than moving: they'll hire better accountants, and not pay their fair share, like all wealthy people do.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...x-bill-822428/


Billions in Profits, No Taxes: How the Trump Tax Code Let 26 Companies Off the Hook
A new study shows how the GOP’s 2017 tax bill helped subsidize corporate America
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2019, 09:16 AM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,250,426 times
Reputation: 14336
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1.. View Post
Yup and food for thought, US Citizens paid almost 90 Billion more in taxes after the trump tax laws.


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ameri...194900782.html

Despite the majority of Americans receiving a tax cut, the IRS pulled in an additional $93 billion for 2018 from taxpayers on individual income taxes than it did for 2017, according to new data from the IRS. This is in part thanks to the Treasury Department processing 1.5% more individual returns for 2018 than 2017.

After the passage of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the IRS encouraged taxpayers to update their withholdings, but few did. More than halfway through 2018, after the law took effect, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) warned that more Americans would owe money to the IRS under the new law while those receiving refunds would decrease. In the end, many Americans saw modest increases in their paychecks throughout the year, but didn’t notice.
So the article is saying 65% got a tax cut, 6% are paying more, and the rest are even.

So even though 94% paid the same or less, the government pulled in $93 Billion more than the previous year, because MORE PEOPLE ARE WORKING. More people are working because corporations are paying less to the government, so they can afford to expand.

It sounds to me like everything is working as planned, according to your article.

Then you have Schumer complaining that people didn't get the refunds they expected. Schumer thinks you and I are idiots. People didn’t get the refunds they were expecting, because they were making more in their paycheck, but they never changed the withholding in their taxes. Who’s fault is that? I know this from my own personal experience, and it is reinforced by the article you posted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top