Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-28-2017, 11:12 AM
 
10,501 posts, read 7,043,034 times
Reputation: 32344

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonyafd View Post
Is your direct supervisor willing to give you a good reference?
Don't say that you got into a fight with the boss. Just say it was office politics.
Never, ever, ever say that in an interview. Whenever someone attributes getting fired or getting passed over to 'office politics,' I consider it a euphemism for any number of the following attributes:

- Bad people skills
- Failure to properly represent the company
- Poor presenter in meetings
- Inability to grasp the company's strategy
- Failure to grow professionally
- Said the wrong thing to the wrong person
- Crappy attitude
- Actually playing politics on the job, which means gossip, turf battles, and getting in the way of getting things done

Weird, but I've never actually encountered anyone who has ever actually done their job well, always tried to improve or learn new things, always was reliable, always kept the company's bottom line in mind, and supported their boss who was ever canned for "office politics."

Last edited by MinivanDriver; 09-28-2017 at 11:25 AM..

 
Old 09-28-2017, 05:18 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,211 posts, read 107,931,771 times
Reputation: 116159
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinivanDriver View Post
Never, ever, ever say that in an interview. Whenever someone attributes getting fired or getting passed over to 'office politics,' I consider it a euphemism for any number of the following attributes:

- Bad people skills
- Failure to properly represent the company
- Poor presenter in meetings
- Inability to grasp the company's strategy
- Failure to grow professionally
- Said the wrong thing to the wrong person
- Crappy attitude
- Actually playing politics on the job, which means gossip, turf battles, and getting in the way of getting things done

Weird, but I've never actually encountered anyone who has ever actually done their job well, always tried to improve or learn new things, always was reliable, always kept the company's bottom line in mind, and supported their boss who was ever canned for "office politics."
I wouldn't assume that. There are bad bosses/supervisors who play favorites, or who are intimidated or annoyed by employees who turn out to be more productive than the boss is (with some bosses, it doesn't take much), and so on. There are people in a position of authority who aren't qualified to be there. One can encounter all kinds of situations in the work world. Maybe the OP grasped the company's strategy and supported it all too well, felt his boss was undermining it (could have been anything: incompetence, corruption, ego-mania of some sort, laziness, whatever), and spoke up. We don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding his having a blow-up with his boss.
 
Old 09-28-2017, 06:12 PM
 
10,501 posts, read 7,043,034 times
Reputation: 32344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
I wouldn't assume that. There are bad bosses/supervisors who play favorites, or who are intimidated or annoyed by employees who turn out to be more productive than the boss is (with some bosses, it doesn't take much), and so on. There are people in a position of authority who aren't qualified to be there. One can encounter all kinds of situations in the work world. Maybe the OP grasped the company's strategy and supported it all too well, felt his boss was undermining it (could have been anything: incompetence, corruption, ego-mania of some sort, laziness, whatever), and spoke up. We don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding his having a blow-up with his boss.
All true. But there are lot better ways to express that. A simple, "There was a change in management and direction, and I was no longer a good fit with that company" would work wonders. But simply ascribing your termination to office politics means a) you played office politics yourself, b) you weren't very good at it, and c) you weren't good enough at your job to rise above it.

As far as the highlighted text is concerned, ANY blowup with the boss is a bad idea.
 
Old 09-28-2017, 06:32 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,269,032 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
I wouldn't assume that. There are bad bosses/supervisors who play favorites, or who are intimidated or annoyed by employees who turn out to be more productive than the boss is (with some bosses, it doesn't take much), and so on. There are people in a position of authority who aren't qualified to be there. One can encounter all kinds of situations in the work world. Maybe the OP grasped the company's strategy and supported it all too well, felt his boss was undermining it (could have been anything: incompetence, corruption, ego-mania of some sort, laziness, whatever), and spoke up. We don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding his having a blow-up with his boss.
I was caught up in a "layoff of one person" about 10 years ago. My job title at that company was "Chief Architect". My name was on the patent of the flagship product. I'd spent 6+ years working long hours to make the company successful. We had 30% market share of the North American market in our space as a tech startup. The guy I'd been doing my startup companies with had a spat with the venture capitalists and got fired. They replaced him with a moron. The moron hired a Chief Technical Officer who was even more of a empty suit moron. These dolts took a company that should have made me millions and ran it into the ground. The CTO presented a totally stupid "plan" for future product development that was the plan at the huge company he used to work for. My response in a public meeting was "If we do that, we're out of business in 2 or 3 years". A couple of months later, I'm laid off. 3 years later, the company was sold for chump change. The venture capitalists lost big money and all the employee stockholders didn't get a dime.

I certainly keep in touch with the "A" players from the team. I'm off doing other things now since the Boston tech startup business for the kinds of things I do dried up and blew away. They all know the score and why I was booted out the door. A Manufacturing/Ops VP friend of mine was fired a few months later for speaking his mind. When you have weak leadership, that kind of thing happens. The morons who killed the company couldn't get hired to be dog catcher after that debacle. I look on LinkedIn occasionally and their title is "experienced executive". I'm crying crocodile tears.
 
Old 09-28-2017, 06:51 PM
 
3,167 posts, read 4,003,230 times
Reputation: 8796
Work friends are not real friends. Everyone should know that. And if you caused trouble and got yourself fired, they definitely aren't going to continue to keep in touch with you.
 
Old 09-28-2017, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Raleigh
8,166 posts, read 8,528,805 times
Reputation: 10147
It's two things:
1. The smell of death surrounds you.
2. Work fiends are just work friends.
"Move on, nothing to see here."
 
Old 09-28-2017, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Niagara Region
1,376 posts, read 2,166,802 times
Reputation: 4847
It doesn't have to do with the circumstances of why you left. It's pretty simple. When one person leaves a group, there is far more impact on that one person, than there is on the entire remaining group. You're just not missed by them as much as you miss them.
 
Old 09-29-2017, 01:07 AM
 
Location: Queens, NY
4,523 posts, read 3,407,262 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mnseca View Post
Work friends are not real friends. Everyone should know that. And if you caused trouble and got yourself fired, they definitely aren't going to continue to keep in touch with you.
Work friends CAN be real friends. In this case, however, they definitely weren't real friends to the OP. Just convenient work friends.
 
Old 09-30-2017, 11:58 PM
 
18,096 posts, read 15,676,604 times
Reputation: 26799
The original poster and message was 3 yrs ago in 2014, so I think s/he's likely found new people to befriend since then and that job is in the rearview mirror.
 
Old 10-01-2017, 02:47 AM
 
Location: Brusssels
1,949 posts, read 3,864,438 times
Reputation: 1921
Its moments like these that we learn who our real friends are - and these are not your real friends.

Sadly, most people at work are only friendly with you so long as you are useful to them. Come to think of it, its not just work friends who are like that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top