Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-18-2013, 03:40 PM
 
1,679 posts, read 3,018,458 times
Reputation: 1296

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Rich has nothing to do with SS remember it has an earnings cap and that amount is hardly rich, Those at the cap are not considered rich. The concept is accurate
The people paying the most into SS are those making over 113K over 35 years adjusted for inflation.

All those people pay the same amount in relation to their benefit. I call these well off people.

The poor making <10K per year adjusted for inflation get a huge SS payoff relative to their taxes. This is just a fact of the SS benefit formula.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2013, 04:37 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,053,820 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by hartford_renter View Post
The people paying the most into SS are those making over 113K over 35 years adjusted for inflation.

All those people pay the same amount in relation to their benefit. I call these well off people.

The poor making <10K per year adjusted for inflation get a huge SS payoff relative to their taxes. This is just a fact of the SS benefit formula.
Agreed, I was capped for a number of years prior to retirement and based on my income alone few in a high COLA area would consider you high on the hog. Well off in some areas comfortable in others. Where we are now it would be well off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2013, 04:42 PM
 
Location: SoCal desert
8,091 posts, read 15,440,674 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucFan View Post
I see people buying homes when they should be renting. I see them driving new or nearly new cars. I see them taking vacations/cruises. I see them buying season tickets to professional sporting events (those cost thousands of dollars each, usually). I see them buying ipods/pads every other year. I see them spending tons on cell phones. I see them buying coffee products at Starbucks at $5 a shot. I see people who forget to pay themselves first and sacrificing wants - to save for retirement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Out of curiosity do you know their annual income and do they individually do all of these or just some?
Ah, come on TuborgP! They (the ubiquitous 'they') post and whine all over the Personal Finance forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2013, 06:48 AM
 
505 posts, read 765,467 times
Reputation: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucFan View Post
I see people buying homes when they should be renting. I see them driving new or nearly new cars. I see them taking vacations/cruises. I see them buying season tickets to professional sporting events (those cost thousands of dollars each, usually). I see them buying ipods/pads every other year. I see them spending tons on cell phones. I see them buying coffee products at Starbucks at $5 a shot. I see people who forget to pay themselves first and sacrificing wants - to save for retirement.
How do you know these people aren't also saving for retirement? Or that they have other sources of income or assets that you don't know about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2013, 06:54 AM
 
505 posts, read 765,467 times
Reputation: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Rich has nothing to do with SS remember it has an earnings cap and that amount is hardly rich, Those at the cap are not considered rich. The concept is accurate
With SS, lower income people who paid less in to the system get a higher % of their payments back compared to higher income people who paid more in to the system. It's just how the formula works.

For Medicare there is no income cap. And the poor are likely to use it as much as the well off. In fact, poorer retirees might even use it more since they are more likely to have certain health related issues than higher income folks. And Medicare is in much worse shape financially than Social Security, especially if health care costs continue rising faster than the economy grows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2013, 08:25 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,053,820 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamrock847 View Post
With SS, lower income people who paid less in to the system get a higher % of their payments back compared to higher income people who paid more in to the system. It's just how the formula works.

For Medicare there is no income cap. And the poor are likely to use it as much as the well off. In fact, poorer retirees might even use it more since they are more likely to have certain health related issues than higher income folks. And Medicare is in much worse shape financially than Social Security, especially if health care costs continue rising faster than the economy grows.
There are medical expenses beyond what Medicare covers and many can't afford supplemental and or co-pays so they self ration their medical services. Some states have recently lowered their Medicaid eligibility thresholds. There are discussions in the retirement forum about our out of pocket costs with Medicare. I just went to a podiatrist the other day and Medicare/secondary covered the Podiatrist but not the the custom inserts at about $250 a pop. I could handle that many at lower incomes wouldn't. My secondary insurance gives virtually unlimited acupuncture etc etc. The poor are less likely to have health benefits from former employers. The least able are more likely to fall behind in paying medical bills and have to find a new doctor or pay money up front prior to being billed. Medicare already differentiates your payment based on income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 09:56 PM
 
13 posts, read 22,285 times
Reputation: 32
Default It's hard

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkmani View Post
One of my favorite finance articles of this year: 76% of Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck.

What is preventing Americans from saving for retirement?
while raising a family .. you work hard to do just that to give them what they need.
By the time you focus on retirement .. you're in your 40's or 50's and it's
too late to come anywhere near 50% of your working income
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 10:01 PM
 
13 posts, read 22,285 times
Reputation: 32
Angry real numbers for retirement

For every 50,000 that you want for annual income in retirement ..
you'll need 1,000,000 to 1.5 million in assets .. for 25 plus years
after you retire
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 10:17 PM
 
1,960 posts, read 4,665,220 times
Reputation: 5416
Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredbig60 View Post
For every 50,000 that you want for annual income in retirement ..
you'll need 1,000,000 to 1.5 million in assets .. for 25 plus years
after you retire
And most will not get there with a 401k. Fact. I suspect a wave of insolvency in retirement for a lot of boomers. Long term I fully expect legislation plusing up Social Security or creating a government run pension/annuity pooling for most workers to rely on. It's the only way they're gonna get a semblance of a traditional retirement income absent employer funding (A or B fund) retirement. DIY retirement was designed to fail the majority..and it did. Nobody can save 20 times their salary on 1970 inflation adjusted money. Check that, they could, but they can't afford a house, cars, education for the children. You know, those evil things that motivate the whole Country to wake up in the morning and actually go to work for....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 09:46 AM
 
18,549 posts, read 15,596,590 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
  1. Failure to adequately moderate spending
  2. Inadequate wages
  3. Inadequate job opportunities
Each affecting about a third of those unable to adequately save for retirement.
4. Racking up too much student loan debt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top