Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Philosophy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 08-14-2020, 01:40 PM
 
1,488 posts, read 1,966,764 times
Reputation: 3249

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Marcinkiewicz View Post
We live to survive, eat, and reproduce. We just tend not to realize that.
That is the first thing people have to understand before thinking about this question. Humans are just smarter animals in comparison to all the other animals on this planet. My use of the word "smarter" was intentional. For all our "intelligence" approximately 85% of us are barely above the level of animals. This sounds controversial until you realize that most of humanity is so dumb that they don't understand the statement you made and never will.

And when I say "comprehend" I referring to the depth of that statement. The 85% have no clue that most of their actions that contribute to the above 3 categories are driven more by their emotions, biology and instinct then the so called "intelligence" that we give our species credit for having. If they did, the world would be a much better place to live in. This leads me back to the question the OP asked.

Animals are not noble by human definition. Very few of them have any altruistic capabilities. Conversely, very few of them go out of their way to needlessly make any other living being suffer. Animals are the closest thing to being morally neutral as you can get. On the other hand humans are a perfectly horrible mix of our innate biological desires/instincts that animals possess coupled with a bit of intelligence. We have just enough intelligence as a species to know we are better then animals in terms of capabilities; yet we are too stupid to realize how horrible of a species we are even when judged by our own moral standards.

So animals are not noble by any standard. However, when judged from the moral standard of "causing an untold amount of mass suffering, torture, destruction and pain" for reasons that do not involve the survival of their own species; animals are leagues above humans. Its not even a fair comparison because we are the worst in that category by a wide margin.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-20-2020, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,316,613 times
Reputation: 5479
Quote:
Originally Posted by orbiter View Post



“Indeed, people speak sometimes about the ‘animal’ cruelty of man, but that is terribly unjust and offensive to animals, no animal could ever be so cruel as a man, so artfully, so artistically cruel”

― Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Man Chimpanzee's are badass....Plus Chimps are pretty much like us and that have evolved to learn they use use tools and can think strategically plus have great memories and can adjust their tactics on the fly shows very high intelligence.


But they can be just as cruel as us or as helpful as us it just all depends since they all have different individual personalities and temperaments.


Another Mammal I think we may have luck working with as in communicating is with pods of Dolphins they are the fun loving Shark killing sometimes human helping and very curious about us creatures.

Last edited by GTOlover; 08-20-2020 at 11:25 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2020, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Swiftwater, PA
18,773 posts, read 18,137,228 times
Reputation: 14777
When a predator like a fox or raccoon gets into a chicken house they will kill every one until none are moving. Then they will take just one home for food. I would presume they would come back again to take more with them if they could. But the point is that they kill as long as any of the prey are moving; it is what nature taught them. The only exception to this is if there were far too many to kill or they did not spot one hidden and not moving. They are not interested in the time and money the farmer spent on raising that flock.

With the recent looting and rioting humans are almost acting the same way. They sense a 'free' meal or loot and do not want others to beat them to the spoils. So, in many cases, are we not also acting out like our wild animals? We are not thinking of the consequences of the lost jobs and stores; only the immediate gratification. In the long run we are not thinking about the pain and suffering we are causing to others.

So which is more noble? One that does not think and only acts or one that acts and does not think until after the fact?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2020, 09:49 AM
 
Location: San Diego CA
8,483 posts, read 6,889,316 times
Reputation: 17008
Nobility? Take the human equation out of the things that inhabit this world and your pets and other animals would tear each other apart to survive. Nobility is a social construct that only people could imagine.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Philosophy

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top