Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2015, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
7,327 posts, read 12,341,534 times
Reputation: 4814

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by observer53 View Post
I suspect there will be some expansion of the bus system based on Prop 104, but not this extensive anytime in the foreseeable future. It's taken forever to get Orbit service south of the 60, and it will be VERY limited and is not particularly well thought out, IMO. So, I'd rather discuss the real plans, not your grandiose ones. They don't help people looking for real, accurate information.
Note that Proposition 104 only covers the City of Phoenix, and serves no purpose for other cities. I highly doubt future bus service expansion will solely be within the Phoenix city limits. The East Valley (Chandler and Gilbert in particular) has a greater need for bus service expansion than the City of Phoenix itself does, since the City of Phoenix is already well served.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2015, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix, AZ USA
17,914 posts, read 43,422,460 times
Reputation: 10726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pink Jazz View Post
Note that Proposition 104 only covers the City of Phoenix, and serves no purpose for other cities. I highly doubt future bus service expansion will solely be within the Phoenix city limits. The East Valley (Chandler and Gilbert in particular) has a greater need for bus service expansion than the City of Phoenix itself does, since the City of Phoenix is already well served.


You are correct about Prop 104. So, where will the money come from for all your dream East Valley bus service? Makes it even more unlikely that your "dreams" will ever be reality. You are so out of touch with what this (and the rail lines) cost, and what areas will actually support the service you are dreaming about. Some of your routes are just never going to be justified, even in your lifetime, much less mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2015, 12:24 PM
 
Location: East Central Phoenix
8,044 posts, read 12,267,795 times
Reputation: 9838
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pink Jazz View Post
I found this interesting Wiki, and I decided to make how I think Valley Metro should look like in the future. Obviously it includes my dream light rail lines, but I also decided to add bus routes, as well as the bus and rail fleets. I added a few local routes, a few express routes, and several more neighborhood circulators.
Improved bus service in suburban areas, including neighborhood circulators is a possibility ... however, if it does happen, it will occur gradually. Light rail extension will take even longer to achieve due to all the construction involved. Even then, many of your dream lines will not come true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by observer53 View Post
Well, let's be clear, you may have found the site, but you WROTE what's in the link. Why don't we wait and see what the ACTUAL plans for bus expansion are based on Prop 104, not your thoughts and dreams. This isn't helpful to people wanting to learn more about the actual present and near future public transit system in Phoenix. I'd suggest you find a blog to talk about this subject, since you are fairly obsessed with it.
I tend to agree ... however, you have to give Pink Jazz credit for one thing: he has positive vision! That's more than I can say for many NIMBYs who are so negative about progress & development, and would protest practically anything. All they care about is their sunshine, mountain views, and their so called tranquility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
7,327 posts, read 12,341,534 times
Reputation: 4814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valley Native View Post
Improved bus service in suburban areas, including neighborhood circulators is a possibility ... however, if it does happen, it will occur gradually. Light rail extension will take even longer to achieve due to all the construction involved. Even then, many of your dream lines will not come true.



I tend to agree ... however, you have to give Pink Jazz credit for one thing: he has positive vision! That's more than I can say for many NIMBYs who are so negative about progress & development, and would protest practically anything. All they care about is their sunshine, mountain views, and their so called tranquility.
Well, portions of the Blue, Silver, Pink, and Brown Lines have been mentioned as potential high capacity transit corridors (either light rail or BRT) in the past, and the Green Line is actually based on a real proposal (the Tempe Streetcar). For the buses, Ray and Val Vista have been mentioned as potential future new bus routes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
7,327 posts, read 12,341,534 times
Reputation: 4814
Also, just for people don't think I am discriminating against the West Valley, I just added two more circulator routes: The Peoria Pixie and the Surprise-Sun Cities Star. Both routes would be operated by Valu Trans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 04:37 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,911,642 times
Reputation: 9252
Why not commuter rail? It can be much faster than driving or light rail. It's been added in Orlando, Salt Lake an Albuquerque among other places. And yes, it has even been tried in Phoenix, though a long time ago and for just a short time. http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/s...ditorial2.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
7,327 posts, read 12,341,534 times
Reputation: 4814
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
Why not commuter rail? It can be much faster than driving or light rail. It's been added in Orlando, Salt Lake an Albuquerque among other places. And yes, it has even been tried in Phoenix, though a long time ago and for just a short time. http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/s...ditorial2.html
Commuter rail, while it may sound ideal due to its low implementation costs, also has its drawbacks. First, the existing freight train right of way wasn't designed for transit purposes in mind, and may not be ideal as far as ridership goes, since it may not actually go where people want to go. Light rail can connect major employment centers, downtown areas, and malls better than commuter rail ever can since it can be placed almost anywhere. You have to factor in the ROI of all options rather than just the implementation costs and speed. Speed does not generate revenue for transit agencies, ridership does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 09:13 AM
 
5 posts, read 6,359 times
Reputation: 10
The light rail is a complete and utter loser. We have gotten ripped off by not only the manufacturer but also whomever in the State got their back sides greased. The taxpayer is getting robbed as usual and it's a total money loser and now, thanks to people that are horribly ignorant, in the midterms, ya'll voted for that 30B tiny extension which is just more robbing of the taxpayer for quite literally zero return in any way, shape or form. It's a huge joke and we should just tear it out and get the money back from the light rail guy's and find out who in the State is the fool that made this bad deal - which I'm also sure got a nice fat pocket now - that needs to be removed and arrested. What a freaking joke. A little factoid. We could have had a beautiful (up in the air off the street) futuristic monorail that wouldn't have gouged the taxpayer like in Seattle, that would have been quite cost effective,
but noooooo........ instead we got a massively overpriced piece of junk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 09:25 AM
 
1,567 posts, read 1,957,540 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzMadMax View Post
The light rail is a complete and utter loser. We have gotten ripped off by not only the manufacturer but also whomever in the State got their back sides greased. The taxpayer is getting robbed as usual and it's a total money loser and now, thanks to people that are horribly ignorant, in the midterms, ya'll voted for that 30B tiny extension which is just more robbing of the taxpayer for quite literally zero return in any way, shape or form. It's a huge joke and we should just tear it out and get the money back from the light rail guy's and find out who in the State is the fool that made this bad deal - which I'm also sure got a nice fat pocket now - that needs to be removed and arrested. What a freaking joke. A little factoid. We could have had a beautiful (up in the air off the street) futuristic monorail that wouldn't have gouged the taxpayer like in Seattle, that would have been quite cost effective,
but noooooo........ instead we got a massively overpriced piece of junk.
I disagree, I don't even ride the light rail hardly ever. But I can tell you driving down the line, the economic impact has been huge. In Tempe, trailer parks were replaced with some nice midrise residential. Apache Blvd/Main Street used to be a dump as was some of the Phoenix areas. These areas would not have seen economic investment if it weren't for the light rail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2015, 05:34 PM
 
2,379 posts, read 2,712,573 times
Reputation: 2765
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempeAZnative View Post
This forum isn't the right place to continually post these type of posts. These are just your fantasy, and will never happen. You should just contact Valley Metro with this, but I have a feeling you already do that daily anyway.
Excuse me, but I find that attitude silly. I think it's a great subject for discussion, and should be regarded as important, since it's linked to issues of congestion and pollution. I also think it's likely fruitless for one person to try to goad Valley Metro to any action, although of course I applaud anyone who tries (as I do myself).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top