Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-04-2009, 10:34 PM
 
Location: Peoria, AZ
1,064 posts, read 2,665,907 times
Reputation: 429

Advertisements

Everything is skewed by bank sales, so I would take the stabilization news with a grain of salt. Things piled up really bad from the previous years of being the worst in the country. Now that the banks sales are actually moving due to dirt cheap pricing, it looks like everything is heading up.

However, if you look at the mid range homes from 200-600ish, actually I don't know where to cut it off, but what I mean to say is most other price ranges besides the cheapest, as well as the fire sale stuff is still pretty stagnant.

I'm glad at least something is selling, but I think a recovery will begin when those entry level buyers are parked there for a few years. When that segment can turn a profit and then afford to purchase their move up home, it will free the mid range people up and the market will start moving again normally.

Just my opinion, but I dont think the fact that we are stabilizing based on an abundance of bank sales moving, that are priced at levels that aren't realistic for a normal home seller is anything to sound the alarm about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2009, 11:09 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
223 posts, read 596,665 times
Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Zillow did not determine the sf. They get data from government records. You have probably been underpaying property taxes for years. Shhhh....
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Indeed.
My son is a UX Designer at Zillow and it's true - their data is only as good as their source.

Ken
Having been in IT/Software for over 25 years I can think of 1,001 ways they could take accurate govt. data and mess it up.

Regarding my property taxes - in CA, the property tax is based on value of sale not on square footage; when you buy, if property value has increased, the property tax increases correspondingly - not related to square footage.

But out of curiosity, where would I verify the 'government records'?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2009, 11:54 PM
 
Location: Tempe and Payson
1,216 posts, read 3,030,548 times
Reputation: 1707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steerpike View Post
Having been in IT/Software for over 25 years I can think of 1,001 ways they could take accurate govt. data and mess it up.

Regarding my property taxes - in CA, the property tax is based on value of sale not on square footage; when you buy, if property value has increased, the property tax increases correspondingly - not related to square footage.

But out of curiosity, where would I verify the 'government records'?
Whatever county your house is in, try that county's assessors office. Most should be online accessible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2009, 11:59 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,457,092 times
Reputation: 55563
home prices have been stabalized by bailout of banks who sustained losses. temporarily they have a lot of property and no uncovered losses, but there are not enough buyers at the artificial price so the property will become a liability. their next move, blue light special to the chinese. but the chinese are shrewd, they will wait for it to fall truly fall same as rich americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2009, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
223 posts, read 596,665 times
Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmist View Post
I think housing in Phx is messed up because the jobs available here do not match the pricing.

Things got messed up because of extremely lenient lending. If people weren't able to qualify for a $500k house on a Walmart salary, the people asking those astronomical prices would have been forced to sell for what the true market would bear. That would have prevented the entire issue in the first place.

Now that banks have toughened up on credit, there isn't much of a local population that have wages to match the pricing, and its not like the poor people who bought at the top can actually lower their prices to something realistic without doing a short sale. So this results in a market where anyone that needs to sell is priced based on what they need to clear, and not what its actually worth. Take bank sales completely out of the equation and then recalculate. The issue is rooted in something much deeper than overbuilding.

I don't think anyone should get too excited because statistics misleadingly show the market as "picking up" just because the banks are able to finally dump their once stagnant inventory at fire sale prices. Its about time they woke up and did whatever they had to in order to dump that trash.

The true indicator will be when a person, NOT a bank, can actually sell their home, make a profit, and pay what another normal seller is asking comfortably based on their normal wages and WITHOUT funky financing. Otherwise, the market will remain locked up, even when the bank sales are gone, since the locals are locked out of their own market.
On the one hand, you seem to acknowledge that prices were unrealistically high, a situation aided and abetted by banks being too lenient (your second paragraph, "the people asking those astronomical prices would have been forced to sell for what the true market would bear."). But then you say this: "So this results in a market where anyone that needs to sell is priced based on what they need to clear, and not what its actually worth.". A house is 'worth' only what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what someone paid for it two years ago or whatever. Two years ago, prices were very high; now prices are much lower.

Anyone who bought at the height of the market has two basic options - ride it out and wait for prices to recover, or, sell at a loss/do a short sale/be foreclosed. This really sucks for those people but - it was not exactly a surprise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2009, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Peoria, AZ
1,064 posts, read 2,665,907 times
Reputation: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steerpike View Post
On the one hand, you seem to acknowledge that prices were unrealistically high, a situation aided and abetted by banks being too lenient (your second paragraph, "the people asking those astronomical prices would have been forced to sell for what the true market would bear."). But then you say this: "So this results in a market where anyone that needs to sell is priced based on what they need to clear, and not what its actually worth.". A house is 'worth' only what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what someone paid for it two years ago or whatever. Two years ago, prices were very high; now prices are much lower. .
Yes, you are actually making the same point as me, but my wording was weird.

What I meant was... A huge chunk of the homes here can NOT be priced at what a buyer is willing to pay, or can afford. They are on the market based on what a seller needs, and will never sell at that price.

As long as the conditions make short sales the only way to sell, I don't perceive there is any type of recovery going on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 02:21 PM
 
133 posts, read 376,969 times
Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steerpike View Post
On the one hand, you seem to acknowledge that prices were unrealistically high, a situation aided and abetted by banks being too lenient (your second paragraph, "the people asking those astronomical prices would have been forced to sell for what the true market would bear."). But then you say this: "So this results in a market where anyone that needs to sell is priced based on what they need to clear, and not what its actually worth.". A house is 'worth' only what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what someone paid for it two years ago or whatever. Two years ago, prices were very high; now prices are much lower.

Anyone who bought at the height of the market has two basic options - ride it out and wait for prices to recover, or, sell at a loss/do a short sale/be foreclosed. This really sucks for those people but - it was not exactly a surprise.
What, exactly, was "the height of the market?" Our neighbors bought in 2002 for $240,000 (2100 sq. ft, 3-car garage, large lot beautiful pool, excellent neighborhood, granite countertops, etc.) and a realtor wants to put it on the market for $260,000 in 2010, after putting more than 30,000 into the house. Your boy, George, was in charge of the "lost decade." Before the lost decade, money doubled every ten years. So, not only did we lose a decade of value, but we lost the doubling effect as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 02:22 PM
 
133 posts, read 376,969 times
Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmist View Post
Yes, you are actually making the same point as me, but my wording was weird.

What I meant was... A huge chunk of the homes here can NOT be priced at what a buyer is willing to pay, or can afford. They are on the market based on what a seller needs, and will never sell at that price.

As long as the conditions make short sales the only way to sell, I don't perceive there is any type of recovery going on.
You are totally wrong. Real estate agents are trained to value the house at current market prices so that they can effect a sale. It has nothing to do with "what the seller needs."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 02:26 PM
 
133 posts, read 376,969 times
Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by amatrine View Post
Zillow says we are down here, but I am seeing homes being sold now, for the first time since I moved here a year and a half ago. Some have sat empty the whole time and now are moving, and I am also seeing properties in the area being improved. People are buying up the bargains and there have been a few good ones. I have seen homes in the upper pricing for this area sell too. (arizona city)
I'm seeing the same thing. All the houses that were for sale over the past two years have sold and the one straggler that was on the market since early 2007, (I saw the family moving out with their four daughters in a UHaul and waved goodbye to nice neighbors who had bought with us in 2000) finally sold for $240,000 (3,570 sq. ft!) this month. Whoever bought it is gutting it and doing a complete upgrade on the interior.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 02:27 PM
 
190 posts, read 844,620 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilbertMom View Post
You are totally wrong. Real estate agents are trained to value the house at current market prices so that they can effect a sale. It has nothing to do with "what the seller needs."
Gotta disagree. Haven't you watched Real Estate Intervention on HGTV?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top