Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2010, 06:05 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

KevK..he wasn't fired for "no reason". He was fired for a specific reason which was a breach of the employment terms he agreed to and signed when he got hired.

Who broke the rules here ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2010, 06:41 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,722,740 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
KevK..he wasn't fired for "no reason". He was fired for a specific reason which was a breach of the employment terms he agreed to and signed when he got hired.

Who broke the rules here ?
Alcohol is perfectly legal but you can be fired for showing up to work drunk. You can probably even be fired for smoking in the workplace even though tobacco is legal and is what made Al Gore's family so rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 06:43 AM
 
Location: nj
1,062 posts, read 1,128,169 times
Reputation: 349
Will school teachers have the right if he wins?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 06:53 AM
 
268 posts, read 454,152 times
Reputation: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
I mean the right to your job. Right now you do not have a right to your job. You may be fired at any time for no reason at all. That is the law. It is just my view that an employee should have some rights to his or her job and those rights would be stronger the longer you work there. If they fire you, they should have to give a valid reason for doing so and if they cannot or don't have one, severance compensation should be ordered.
And that's the way it should stay. Employers aren't in the business of just firing people for no reason. It doesn't happen because it doesn't accrue revenue, and thus doesn't make any sense. Employers are in the business of making money. If you're a good employee, hard working, honest, and contribute to the overall success of the business, you'll keep your job. If you're not a good employee, you're lazy, and cost the company money, you'll be fired. That is what's in the best interest of the company and that is what the employer will do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,761 posts, read 14,661,252 times
Reputation: 18534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeezy is BACK View Post
And that's the way it should stay. Employers aren't in the business of just firing people for no reason. It doesn't happen because it doesn't accrue revenue, and thus doesn't make any sense. Employers are in the business of making money. If you're a good employee, hard working, honest, and contribute to the overall success of the business, you'll keep your job. If you're not a good employee, you're lazy, and cost the company money, you'll be fired. That is what's in the best interest of the company and that is what the employer will do.
Oh good. Another congregant in the Church of Business Can Do No Wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 07:12 AM
 
268 posts, read 454,152 times
Reputation: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmccullough View Post
Oh good. Another congregant in the Church of Business Can Do No Wrong.
Do you know any perfectly capable hard working person who's ever been fired for no reason whatsoever? Didn't think so. Wouldn't make sense to fire a perfectly good employee, only to spend time and money finding a new employee that could possibly turn out to be a bad employee.

It doesn't make business sense and that's why it doesn't happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,761 posts, read 14,661,252 times
Reputation: 18534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeezy is BACK View Post
Do you know any perfectly capable hard working person who's ever been fired for no reason whatsoever? Didn't think so. Wouldn't make sense to fire a perfectly good employee, only to spend time and money finding a new employee that could possibly turn out to be a bad employee.

It doesn't make business sense and that's why it doesn't happen.
No reason whatsoever? No.

No good reason? No reason that has anything to do with the employer's legitimate business interests? Yes, plenty of times. Including every employee who has ever been fired for off-duty, off-premises drug use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 07:32 AM
 
268 posts, read 454,152 times
Reputation: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmccullough View Post
No reason whatsoever? No.

No good reason? No reason that has anything to do with the employer's legitimate business interests? Yes, plenty of times. Including every employee who has ever been fired for off-duty, off-premises drug use.
If a business preemptively outlines regulations concerning active drug use during employment, and states they will not employ an individual who is actively using drugs, one will be fired for such. Haven't we gone over this?

If you want to smoke pot, you can't work at Wal-Mart. If you're working at Wal-Mart, you know this before you gain employment with them. How is that Wal-Mart's problem? And how is this a bad reason for termination? You are made well aware before being made an employee that active drug use is grounds for termination. Don't smoke pot, or work somewhere else.

The real problem is self entitlement. What makes you so entitled to employment? Why should a business be required to employ you? They shouldn't, because this is The United Sates. You're entitled to pursuit of happiness. Which means you have to work to make it happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 07:38 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,894,256 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmccullough View Post
No reason whatsoever? No.

No good reason? No reason that has anything to do with the employer's legitimate business interests? Yes, plenty of times. Including every employee who has ever been fired for off-duty, off-premises drug use.
I had a friend who was an alcoholic. It got so bad, that everyday she would go home at lunch and make herself a few vodka martinis. Her afternoons were conducted in an alcohol haze. Since the bulk of her job was dealing with customers, her drinking affected her job performance, and her employer had to let her go. But hey, she never drank on the job, she was always off-duty and off-premises. So, according to you, her employer didn't have a good reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 07:39 AM
 
268 posts, read 454,152 times
Reputation: 165
Also:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeezy is BACK View Post
And how would you suggest an employer avoid hiring an employee who smokes pot at work aside from a standard drug test?

Sure, it sounds good to say that hey, you can smoke pot at home, just leave it there. But is there any full-proof way of knowing the employee will do that? No.

In the interest of safety, when a person tests positive for any drugs, a responsible employer should always assume that said employee will also be doing the drug on the job.

Safety and responsibility. Unless you know something the rest of us don't, standard drug testing is the best way to go about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top