Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-14-2010, 12:16 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,480,300 times
Reputation: 4799

Advertisements

In your link it states that Bush created 3 million jobs over his 8 years in office. That's not something hunky-dory but it also totally ignores the fact that Bush took office directly after the Dot-Com bust which consumed $6 trillion in wealth and then 8 short months later 9/11 happened of which, ignoring the loss of lives, absorbed another $2 trillion dollars. Enron and Katrina... I don't know what is expected by you of a president but to even be in the positive after all that is rather astonishing. Then of course you have Obama who has lost 4 million jobs since he took office.

See the folly in your data starting on January 20th and ending on January 19th. Probably not...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-14-2010, 12:20 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,480,300 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
The bottom line is the Bush 43 Administration did a lousy job as a custodian of the American economy. Low employment growth, and low tax revenue growth DESPITE CUTTING TAXES.

Thanks for sharing the link I've already used it to get the tax rate information in my last post.
And you purposely left out details of what the top marginal rate actually was?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 12:21 PM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,306,984 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
And you purposely left out details of what the top marginal rate actually was?
Thanks for sharing!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 12:22 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,143,658 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
The bottom line is the Bush 43 Administration did a lousy job as a custodian of the American economy. Low employment growth, and low tax reveue growth DESPITE CUTTING TAXES.

Thanks for sharing the link I've already used it to get the tax rate information in my last post.
Wrong.. Bottom line is Bush 43 had 10,200,000 new jobs created from 2003-2007 and only AFTER Democrats took over did YOUR SIDE screw things up..

Revenues increased, jobs were increasing.. And the economy was doing so great when Democrats took over that they even managed to pass an increase in minimum wage claiming the economy was strong enough to substain the growth.. YOUR SIDE was wrong.. as you usually are with everything else..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 12:25 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,480,300 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Thanks for sharing!
I accept you gracefully bowing out! Till next time...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 12:38 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,894,387 times
Reputation: 18305
Basically there is a growing gap in skill related to the modern needs and that means more are dependent on a much smaller number of people. At the same time thsoe same poeple refuce jobs that go to foreign labor such as from Mexico.Every administration has pointed out the lack of thios country producing the technical level in skills need for decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 12:53 PM
 
320 posts, read 290,543 times
Reputation: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Wrong.. Bottom line is Bush 43 had 10,200,000 new jobs created from 2003-2007 and only AFTER Democrats took over did YOUR SIDE screw things up..

Revenues increased, jobs were increasing.. And the economy was doing so great when Democrats took over that they even managed to pass an increase in minimum wage claiming the economy was strong enough to substain the growth.. YOUR SIDE was wrong.. as you usually are with everything else..
You mean low-paying jobs while good jobs were being lost?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,531,102 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domination83 View Post
You mean low-paying jobs while good jobs were being lost?
Yes and loose credit enabled people to continue feeling "rich" while buying with debt..money they didn't have.

Fast forward to today and all that "credit" has dried up. These people are left with living within their paycheck means and they refuse to do it.

DEBT gave the illusion of wealth.
This applied not only to people but to our own government as well.
We are not rich..we are in debt past our eyeballs and no other country wants to lend to us anymore so much so that our Federal Reserve has to print money to buy our Treasury bonds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 05:04 PM
 
277 posts, read 228,973 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domination83 View Post
You mean low-paying jobs while good jobs were being lost?
that would be from the clinton policies and standards

the mantra "clinton created 22 million jobs"----the truth, clinton created 22 million low paying jobs while 18 million high paying jobs left, the grand total clinton only gained 4 million jobs

bush about the same, obama doing even worse
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,531,102 times
Reputation: 27720
It really doesn't matter now WHICH PARTY started it. It was done by OUR government.
And each party took their turn opening that global door another inch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top