Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2010, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
I sgree, this is crazy all the other stuff that has been attached
Oh yeah, can't forget all the other crap attached to this, as if more federal subsides for green energy should be added to our debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2010, 03:35 PM
 
628 posts, read 1,316,119 times
Reputation: 550
I'm against the bill for now. Along with spending cuts, the increase in revenue that the higher rates bring in should be used 100% towards reducing the deficit....not used for more big government programs. We ALL pay the price for a few years...get the deficit under control...then come in with a tax plan that lowers taxes for everyone and doesnt contribute to the death spiral we are currently in. It would also give congress time to come up with a "fair tax" plan that gets rid of the IRS, cuts paperwork and loopholes and taxes people FAIRLY.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 03:37 PM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,303,308 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I am now, what will all the "sweeteners" (another huge stimulus for obama) being lumped into another wish list of liberal pork barrel projects.

I want a friggin CLEAN bill, nothing else riding along, just the tax RATE extensions, the UE extension and the 2% cut in the payroll tax.

That's it!

Nothing else should be in the bill.

It's not going to happen. There is no way a clean bill gets through the Senate.

As long as it takes 60 votes to get something through the Senate you are going to see legislation that is "compromised" in terms of political principle. The Democrats had to do it for healthcare and financial reform and now the Republicans have to do it for tax cuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Boise
2,684 posts, read 6,887,702 times
Reputation: 1018
I don't think the economy would die if the upper class would pay 2% higher income tax. I'm a conservative, but think something needs to be done about the deficit. I think we need drastic cuts across the board. I think there are easily hundreds of billions to be saved in the "defense" budget, but that is a sacred cow, so I don't anticipate anything drastic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Inland Levy County, FL
8,806 posts, read 6,112,361 times
Reputation: 2949
One thing to point out is that the conservatives would be understanding if the Repubs defeated it. We know they won't allow it to remain that way for too long. However, the libs would be much more angry at their legislators b/c they only see that their taxes are getting raised, THEY are the gimme party. That could work in our (conservatives) favor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,744,889 times
Reputation: 9325
Stopping the largest tax increase in the history of our country is a good thing. There is not bad tax reduction. There is no good tax increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Inland Levy County, FL
8,806 posts, read 6,112,361 times
Reputation: 2949
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
It's not going to happen. There is no way a clean bill gets through the Senate.

As long as it takes 60 votes to get something through the Senate you are going to see legislation that is "compromised" in terms of political principle. The Democrats had to do it for healthcare and financial reform and now the Republicans have to do it for tax cuts.
The Dems hardly compromised with healthcare. The public option also did not have support from enough Dems, nevermind the Repubs. The Dems shoved the bill through sans public option with no consideration of what the GOP or the people thought about it. This is definitely not the same situation as the current tax proposal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Inland Levy County, FL
8,806 posts, read 6,112,361 times
Reputation: 2949
Quote:
Originally Posted by jufrbo View Post
I don't think the economy would die if the upper class would pay 2% higher income tax. I'm a conservative, but think something needs to be done about the deficit. I think we need drastic cuts across the board. I think there are easily hundreds of billions to be saved in the "defense" budget, but that is a sacred cow, so I don't anticipate anything drastic.
I disagree. While nobody would "die," it disincentivizes working and makes the rich less likely to stimulate the economy in any way. If you take their money, where will the jobs come from? Who will prop up Wall Street? Who's going to buy extravagant cars, homes and "stuff"?

A percentage is a percentage is a percentage; people are not understanding this. Everyone pays their fair share even when there is a flat tax rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,201,963 times
Reputation: 29983
Even though nothing more is politically feasible, I don't particularly support this deal because it does nothing to address a core issue caused by the possible expiration of the current tax rates: uncertainty. Extending the current rates for two years is all well and good, but they still don't allow people to order their affairs for the long term. Passing the bill as is will have little impact on the short-term economic picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:45 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,939,504 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
Even though nothing more is politically feasible, I don't particularly support this deal because it does nothing to address a core issue caused by the possible expiration of the current tax rates: uncertainty. Extending the current rates for two years is all well and good, but they still don't allow people to order their affairs for the long term. Passing the bill as is will have little impact on the short-term economic picture.
Very true. Most business have five year plans, not two. Frankly I hope the Democrats are successful in screwing over their base and cause their tax rates to go up on January 1st. At least the opportunity would be the Republicans to fix correctly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top