9/11 and Cameras in your cable box (gallon, drug, FBI, March)

[mistygrl092]

Originally Posted by Darkatt

Thank you.. I had basically debunked the camera in the cable box thing earlier, but knowing that someone else knows it was a not only a spoof, but knows who did it, makes ti so much nicer.

Well, here is the problem. The "questionable" stuff is always posted in these threads. And then when the unquestionable gets posted, no one pays attention.

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by mistygrl092

JMHO, but at that speed, I can see why people would see a plane and not a missile. I mean, who would think missile?

Obviously, nobody who actually saw anything.

Also, a lot of these accounts did not see a "jet." They heard rumbling, black smoke.

Rumbling and black smoke is rather to be expected.

Also, no one has answered my question, why not just release the footage and stop all the speculation?

No idea. Why not go on what we actually have instead of making deductions based on the absence of data?

[Metlakatla]

Originally Posted by mistygrl092

JMHO, but at that speed, I can see why people would see a plane and not a missile. I mean, who would think missile?

Also, a lot of these accounts did not see a "jet." They heard rumbling, black smoke. All I saw was a perfect hole and no scorched grass.

Also, no one has answered my question, why not just release the footage and stop all the speculation?

So do you believe that the friends and family of the people who were supposed to be on that plane which was really a missile are involved in the conspiracy as well?

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

Obviously, nobody who actually saw anything.

Rumbling and black smoke is rather to be expected.

No idea. Why not go on what we actually have instead of making deductions based on the absence of data?

Can you get the confiscated security videos released?

[sanspeur]

Every single one of the events on 9/11 has been explained, but you tin hat folks refuse to believe them...Like all conspiracy theories you start with a conclusion (9/11 was an inside job) the look for anything that seems to back up that conclusion and disregard every piece of evidence that doesn't...

You folks are much like biblical literalists I debate with, and it is like a religion to you...

The buildings didn't free fall. Once the fire heated up the steel frame to it's failure point (it was not necessarily melted), then that floor and all the floors above it collapsed onto the floor below. It was never designed to hold such a tremendous weight, so it went down causing a chain reaction with all the floors below...

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by Metlakatla

So do you believe that the friends and family of the people who were supposed to be on that plane which was really a missile are involved in the conspiracy as well?

I think that's worthy of investigation.

Where's the paparazzi when you need them?

They're all a buncha cowards, that's what!

[mistygrl092]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

No idea. Why not go on what we actually have instead of making deductions based on the absence of data?

And this is why we need a new investigation. Why all the secrecy? Why not just show the damn footage and clear it up?

So many unanswered questions. I am starting to think Obama is not such a good guy after all. He could have insisted on a new investigation.

[mistygrl092]

Originally Posted by sanspeur

Every single one of the events on 9/11 has been explained, but you tin hat folks refuse to believe them...Like all conspiracy theories you start with a conclusion (9/11 was an inside job) the look for anything that seems to back up that conclusion and disregard every piece of evidence that doesn't...

You folks are much like biblical literalists I debate with, and it is like a religion to you...

The buildings didn't free fall. Once the fire heated up the steel frame to it's failure point (it was not necessarily melted), then that floor and all the floors above it collapsed onto the floor below. It was never designed to hold such a tremendous weight, so it went down causing a chain reaction with all the floors below...

Really? Tell me, why did NORAD stand down? Why wouldn't Bush testify without Cheney present and not under oath?

Oh, that's right. You live in Canada so can not be expected to know NORAD protocols. Do you have a dog in this fight?

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by mistygrl092

Citation please?

Forensic feat IDs nearly all Pentagon victims

If you're really interested, there are some unpleasant images submitted as evidence in the Moussaoui trial - exhibits P20042 - P20048.

U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Virginia

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by mistygrl092

Really? Tell me, why did NORAD stand down?

Evidence that NORAD was ordered to stand down?