Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
check out the cost of a B2 spirit stealth bomber they are very expensive to operate and maintain.
same with the F-22 which in a sense was the replacement for the F-117 and the F-15 eagle all rolled into one plane.
Yeah. A billion dollars or something per B-2. And one crashed a year or two back, also.
check out the cost of a B2 spirit stealth bomber they are very expensive to operate and maintain.
same with the F-22 which in a sense was the replacement for the F-117 and the F-15 eagle all rolled into one plane.
It's worth every penny of the goodwill it bought us.
"One of the airmen landed in a field and approached a crowd of people, not knowing whether they were supporters of Moammar Gadhafi or members of the opposition, Britain's Daily Telegraph reported. It turned out they were locals who opposed the Libyan leader, the paper said. "I hugged him and said, 'Don't be scared, we are your friends,'" witness Younis Amruni told the Telegraph.
"Locals reportedly lined up to shake the airman's hands in thanks. "We are so grateful to these men who are protecting the skies," Amruni said. "We gave him juice and then the revolutionary military people took him away.""
US jet crashes in Libya; fighting rages in cities - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110322/ap_on_re_af/af_libya - broken link)
Both crew members safely ejected before crashing, apparently we will put US forces on the ground in Libya after all.
Let me see if I can offer a scenario.
The two fighter pilots end up in enemy territory, so they send in special forces or a recon squad to retrieve them. This group comes under fire and suddenly the NY Times (with full approval of the White House) runs a headline, "American forces under attack", to which then a larger force is offered to handle the situation. While in the course of these actions, we end up in a running fire fight in which two soldiers are killed. The next NY times article runs "Americans killed in Libya", to which both sides of the aisle in Congress tell the President, 'do what it takes to deal with the situation', and the President responds by escalating things further under the premise of 'defending Americans', to which then the press reports, and Americans suddenly get behind our guys, and two weeks later the first humvee's and troops start landing in Tbilisi.
well he did not shoot it down it was a malfuction that caused it to go down and it was at high altitude. so the F-15 still holds it's untarnished record of never being shot down in combat and have the most air-air combat kills of any other plane of the jet age
True. The F-15, and particularly the Strike Eagle is an amazing aircraft. Especially true for a design that is going on 50 years old! To be honest, it's a bargin, compared to the cost of newer aircraft.
The two fighter pilots end up in enemy territory, so they send in special forces or a recon squad to retrieve them. This group comes under fire and suddenly the NY Times (with full approval of the White House) runs a headline, "American forces under attack", to which then a larger force is offered to handle the situation. While in the course of these actions, we end up in a running fire fight in which two soldiers are killed. The next NY times article runs "Americans killed in Libya", to which both sides of the aisle in Congress tell the President, 'do what it takes to deal with the situation', and the President responds by escalating things further under the premise of 'defending Americans', to which then the press reports, and Americans suddenly get behind our guys, and two weeks later the first humvee's and troops start landing in Tbilisi.
Or we could leave now.
That's quite the vivid imagination you have there!
That's quite the vivid imagination you have there!
Is it any more vivid than the bizarro world fantasy that led us into Iraq, or Somalia, or Yemen, or Pakistan?
When you are faced with a government culture of militarism, just about any wild scenario can and will be used to justify a continuation of the status quo.
I know and the F-22 IS the plane that should still be in prduction the F35 is not even near the same level of performance the F22 was but the are makeing a revised F-15 called the siliet eagle which is has the stealth signature of the F-22 from the front and side profile it is only vulnerable from the rear to enemy radar.
The two fighter pilots end up in enemy territory, so they send in special forces or a recon squad to retrieve them. This group comes under fire and suddenly the NY Times (with full approval of the White House) runs a headline, "American forces under attack", to which then a larger force is offered to handle the situation. While in the course of these actions, we end up in a running fire fight in which two soldiers are killed. The next NY times article runs "Americans killed in Libya", to which both sides of the aisle in Congress tell the President, 'do what it takes to deal with the situation', and the President responds by escalating things further under the premise of 'defending Americans', to which then the press reports, and Americans suddenly get behind our guys, and two weeks later the first humvee's and troops start landing in Tbilisi.
Or we could leave now.
I agree. That's how it starts. And then keeps going and going.......
There will be people on this forum who think you're out of your mind...I happen to believe that a scenario such as this is very possible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.