Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Zimbo, the pro-life crusaders don't want to deal with my story because it's too real and too raw. Much easier to talk in hypotheticals. Honestly, after having lived through it, I can't really blame them.
True, but we DO have EVERY RIGHT to attempt to bring about the legal change to save the lives of the currently-killed pre-born infants slaughtered by the pro-infanticide brown-shirts.
Once a baby is developing it is no longer "your body" it is now an apartment for another life.
It's still in a woman's body and she has the right to do whatever she pleaes in terms of having an abortion whether you or anybody else likes it or not.
so you are presumptuous enough to tell people what to do with their life if they have sex, yet you don't want to pay for any procedure. sounds opinionated, bossy and cheap.
do you support paying for all the social services once a child is born?
A substantial number of people that are anti-choice also don't support government funding of social services for poor women or their children.
True, but we DO have EVERY RIGHT to attempt to bring about the legal change to save the lives of the currently-killed pre-born infants slaughtered by the pro-infanticide brown-shirts.
One way of preventing all abortions would be to implement a law that requires all males to have reversible vasectomies. How about them apples? It would nip the problem in the bud. I demand that you get snipped until further notice. All of you. It's time you took this issue into your own hands. You want to full around with and lord over another person's body, then do so to your own.
Also jeffington, you are no longer allowed to have sex unless your intent is to breed. No ifs, ands, or buts about this one.
I love this phrase - Reproductive Rights - and its use by Pro-Choicers.
It is as if the argument revolves around the issue of stopping people from reproducing when in fact after someone actually re-produces a human being they scream about their right to murder it when in fact they are the ones who put a stop to reproduction. I-effing-ronic.
Only pro-choicers would rely on the thier idiotic followers to fall for that.
When someone is trying to convince you that your decision is wrong, because it is murdering a human being, nothing is being violated, even if you use the WHO definition.
This just made me laugh. The lengths to which some will go to confuse the whole issue is really sad, especially when you have those with bumper stickers pretending to say something meaningful and important about a serious issue like abortion.
Sorry having an abortion is NOT murdering a human being. It's destroying a fetus.
I know, i know, but it's hard! i have urges! I have needs!
When your rights impede on my rights, there's a problem.
When I am forced to take on YOUR responsibilities for you because YOU seem to feel that YOU have a "right" to do it, it's a problem.
But a woman having an abortion doesn't have a damn thing to with your rights.
Something that YOU conveniently choose to ignore.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
