Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you consider voting for Ron Paul?
Yes 31 31.96%
No 51 52.58%
Maybe with more information about him 4 4.12%
I've alreading decided to Vote for Obama 11 11.34%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-13-2011, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Helena, Montana
2,010 posts, read 2,372,640 times
Reputation: 783

Advertisements

I'm wondering if the left that is unhappy with Obama's performance would consider Paul. That, and I think that a lot of Republicans are unhappy with the direction of the GOP and believe Paul could help getting them back on the right track. I just don't think Paul running as a libertarian stands a chance, not enough financial backing. If the GOP has the slightest clue about what's at stake, they won't put up another worthless turd (see McCain) against Obama, or they're going to lose (again). The smart play is to give Paul the nod. If I wasn't registered as an Independent I'd help him in the primaries. All I know is I will not be voting for Obama. If the GOP puts up a dunce, I'll write in Donald duck for president. The "voting for the lesser of two evils" crap is getting old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
9,394 posts, read 15,697,329 times
Reputation: 6262
If I could vote I'd vote for Paul or maybe Daniels (if he runs).

Paul will have a tough time. He's not enough of a jingoistic spender who loves big government, nor is he enough of a social conservative to want to impose his own beliefs nationwide (see his stance on abortion for example), so that makes it hard to get the far-right vote. He's not enough of a socialist who wants to take more of hard-working people's money and give it to those who don't deserve it, so it'll be tough to get the far-left vote.

Indeed, it seems that more and more you've gotta be an extremist on either side to have a chance. Here's hoping I'm wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Norman, OK
3,478 posts, read 7,257,971 times
Reputation: 1201
Ron Paul is toast. On economic policies he might have a leg up. But his 19th century mentality of the role of the US in the world is simply warped and unrealistic. I am all about a "return to Constitutionality" but let's face it - we live in a globalized world and there are some responsibilities with that, which were likely unimaginable for the Founders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,554,711 times
Reputation: 24780
Default Would you consider voting for Ron Paul?

I'm not a Dem, but I voted in the poll, anyway.

I wouldn't vote for Ron Paul. Not because I think he's devoid of good ideas. I really like some of his stands on the issues. And I respect his willingness to buck the GOP establishment. But he has too many fringe nutty ideas for me.

One example: turning over public highways to private corporations to operate as toll roads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,713,235 times
Reputation: 14818
No. While I definitely agree with him on the need for defense cuts and some other key issues, I could never vote for anyone who embraces The John Birch Society.

Last edited by TigerLily24; 05-13-2011 at 10:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,830,565 times
Reputation: 12341
As a democratic leaning independent, Ron Paul is the ONE republican I have respect for. That doesn't guarantee I would vote for him because he is way too much of an ideologue in my opinion. He makes sense on most issues, but most importantly, comes out as an honest politician (a rarity), but he assumes the real world to be a replica of a utopia. Sometimes, too much of states' rights person as well, whereas I'm for people's rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,097,596 times
Reputation: 2971
I like Ron Paul. He's a great guy, and very friendly and grounded person. However, he has an extreme limited world view, and is not a NATIONAL leader.

Awesome for House representative, but not Senator nor President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:16 AM
 
45,235 posts, read 26,464,208 times
Reputation: 24995
Pauls world view involves commerce and not killing. Thats too civilized and sophisticated a position for blood thirsty, anti-trade dems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,856,185 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
No. While I definitely agree with him on the need for defense cuts and some other key issues, I could never vote for anyone who embraces The John Birth Society.
Another well informed Obama supporter, it's the John Birch Society.

The John Birch Society

Their slogan on their website is "Less government, more responsibility and with God's help, a better world". I can see how that would **** off a lot of rabid liberal idiots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2011, 09:27 AM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,328,875 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
As a democratic leaning independent, Ron Paul is the ONE republican I have respect for. That doesn't guarantee I would vote for him because he is way too much of an ideologue in my opinion. He makes sense on most issues, but most importantly, comes out as an honest politician (a rarity), but he assumes the real world to be a replica of a utopia. Sometimes, too much of states' rights person as well, whereas I'm for people's rights.
The 9th Amendment precedes and therefore "chiefs" the 10th Amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top